Biomass residues for energy production and habitat preservation. Case study in a montado area in Southwestern Europe

The use of forest and agricultural residues for energy production presents multiple benefits, but the link between bioenergy and the environment is complex and not all of the energetic options have the same impacts. This work evaluates the net positive effect of valorizing residual biomass in the context of a rural area of Portugal, Estremoz. It focuses on the combined assessment of biomass availability, techno-economic feasibility and environmental aspects of utilizing forest and agricultural residues to produce bioheat. At first, the energy potential of the residual biomass available in the municipality is evaluated using a geographical information system database. The assessment with RETScreen of the techno-economic feasibility of replacing electricity by biomass for heating local public schools follows. The results show that around 27 314 t of residues, corresponding to about 267 680 GJ, are produced each year in Estremoz, more than half in montado areas. The use of this biomass for the replacement of the existing electric heating systems of nine local schools by biomass-based ones offers good project profitability. As far as the environment is concerned, the energetic valorization of the residual biomass in Estremoz has multiple benefits. It contributes to climate change mitigation by saving greenhouse gas emissions and promoting the preservation of the traditional extensive uses of the ecosystems. Moreover, a correct vegetation management decreases the fire risk, potentiates the increase in biodiversity, offers better conditions for native species and allows to maintain the ecosystems.

[1]  Charles Smith,et al.  Environmental factors in woodfuel production: Opportunities, risks, and criteria and indicators for sustainable practices , 2009 .

[2]  L. Bianchi,et al.  Shrub facilitation of Quercus ilex and Quercus pubescens regeneration in a wooded pasture in central Sardinia (Italy) , 2010 .

[3]  Nicolae Scarlat,et al.  Assessment of the availability of Agricultural and Forest Residues for Bioenergy Production in Romania , 2011 .

[4]  S. Rambal,et al.  The dehesa system of southern Spain and Portugal as a natural ecosystem mimic , 1999, Agroforestry Systems.

[5]  F. Moreira,et al.  Landscape--wildfire interactions in southern Europe: implications for landscape management. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  S. Huttunen,et al.  Policy coherence in climate change mitigation: An ecosystem service approach to forests as carbon sinks and bioenergy sources , 2015 .

[7]  Norberto Fueyo,et al.  The potential for electricity generation from crop and forestry residues in Spain , 2010 .

[8]  Eliseu Monteiro,et al.  Bioenergy overview for Portugal , 2009 .

[9]  L. Gazarini,et al.  Conservation of Mediterranean oak woodlands: understorey dynamics under different shrub management , 2011, Agroforestry Systems.

[10]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Assessing Options for Electricity Generation from Biomass on a Life Cycle Basis: Environmental and Economic Evaluation , 2011 .

[11]  Robert Mavsar,et al.  Assessing impacts of intensified biomass production and biodiversity protection on ecosystem services provided by European forests. , 2014 .

[12]  U. Fernandes,et al.  Potential of biomass residues for energy production and utilization in a region of Portugal , 2010 .

[13]  S. Rivas-martínez.  Brezales y jarales de Europa occidental (Revisión Fitosociológica de las clases Calluno-Ulicetea y Cisto-Lavanduletea) , 1979 .

[14]  A. Turhollow,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of using corn stover to supply heat and power to a corn ethanol plant – Part 2: Cost of heat and power generation systems , 2010 .

[15]  A. Pérez-Navarro,et al.  Methodology for optimization of distributed biomass resources evaluation, management and final energy use , 2009 .

[16]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Comparative environmental and energy profiles of potential bioenergy production chains in Southern Europe , 2014 .

[17]  J. Franklin.  Preserving Biodiversity: Species, Ecosystems, or Landscapes? , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[18]  B. Y. Wong,et al.  Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity in Socio-Ecological Production Landscapes: Background to the 'Satoyama Initiative for the benefit of biodiversity and human well-being'. , 2010 .

[19]  Teresa Pinto-Correia,et al.  Contribution to the extensification/intensification debate: new trends in the Portuguese montado , 1999 .

[20]  Norberto Fueyo,et al.  An estimation of the energy potential of agro-industrial residues in Spain , 2010 .

[21]  Paulo Brito,et al.  Assessment of biomass energy potential in a region of Portugal (Alto Alentejo) , 2015 .

[22]  Jorge S. Carlos,et al.  Retrofit measures in old elementary school buildings towards energy efficiency , 2010 .

[23]  Mehrdad Mallaki,et al.  Design of a biomass power plant for burning date palm waste to cogenerate electricity and distilled water. , 2014 .

[24]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Assessment of the potential biomass supply in Europe using a resource-focused approach , 2004 .

[25]  Warren B. Cohen,et al.  Assessment of forest biomass for use as energy. GIS-based analysis of geographical availability and locations of wood-fired power plants in Portugal , 2010 .

[26]  Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos,et al.  Environmental sustainability and financial feasibility evaluation of woodfuel biomass used for a potential replacement of conventional space heating sources. Part I: a Greek case study , 2010, Oper. Res..

[27]  M. Fergusson,et al.  Energy from biomass in the UK: sources, processes and biodiversity implications , 2006 .

[28]  A. Faaij,et al.  European biomass resource potential and costs , 2010 .

[29]  Katalin Bódis,et al.  The possible contribution of agricultural crop residues to renewable energy targets in Europe: A spatially explicit study , 2013 .

[30]  Gianni Picchi,et al.  Vineyard residues as a fuel for domestic boilers in Trento Province (Italy): comparison to wood chips and means of polluting emissions control , 2013 .

[31]  Emmanuel Kakaras,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of the energy exploitation of biomass residues in Heraklion Prefecture—Crete , 2009 .

[32]  T. Plieninger,et al.  Effects of land-use and landscape structure on holm oak recruitment and regeneration at farm level in Quercus ilex L. dehesas , 2004 .

[33]  Aikaterini Tsikaloudaki,et al.  The exploitation of biomass for building space heating in Greece: Energy, environmental and economic considerations , 2014 .

[34]  L. H. Cammeraat,et al.  The evolution and significance of soil–vegetation patterns following land abandonment and fire in Spain , 1999 .

[35]  J. Canadell,et al.  Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[36]  Anastasia Zabaniotou,et al.  Investigation of agricultural and animal wastes in Greece and their allocation to potential application for energy production , 2007 .

[37]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Global implications of biomass and biofuel use in Germany : recent trends and future scenarios for domestic and foreign agricultural land use and resulting GHG emissions , 2009 .

[38]  F. López-Rodríguez,et al.  Spatial assessment of the bioenergy potential of forest residues in the western province of Spain, Caceres , 2009 .

[39]  P. Harrison,et al.  Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review , 2014 .

[40]  Paola Ovando,et al.  Does private income support sustainable agroforestry in Spanish dehesa , 2008 .