Correlation of Moisture Loss and Strength Gain in Chip Seals

One of the most subjective decisions made during chip seal construction concerns when to allow brooms and traffic on the newly placed surface. If traffic is allowed too early, damage to the surface and to vehicles may occur. If the chip seal is opened too late, traffic is disrupted and motorists are inconvenienced. The curing of asphalt emulsions in the field is related to many factors, all affecting how fast the asphalt emulsion cures. Three laboratory test methods that measure adhesive strength gain as a function of moisture loss are presented. Two of the methods were sweep tests, one performed according to ASTM D7000 and the other according to a modified method. The third test used frosted marbles to measure adhesive strength gain. Results of all tests were similar and indicated that strength in emulsion residues increased as the total moisture in the system was reduced. This finding is important because the moisture content is independent of the mechanism reducing it. Therefore, prediction of strength gain should be possible by measurement of the moisture loss of a given chip seal system. The time required to obtain that strength gain varies in seals because of differences in emulsion, aggregate, interaction factors, weather, ambient temperature, and other environmental factors. Test results indicated that as moisture loss approached 75% to 90%, strength gain was significantly enhanced.

[1]  B M Gallaway,et al.  RETENTION OF COVERSTONE BY ASPHALT SURFACE TREATMENTS , 1953 .

[2]  Scott Shuler.  HIGH-TRAFFIC CHIP-SEAL CONSTRUCTION: THE TULSA TEST ROAD , 1991 .

[3]  N W Mcleod.  BASIC PRINCIPLES FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF SEAL COATS AND SURFACE TREATMENTS WITH CUTBACK ASPHALTS AND ASPHALT CEMENTS , 1960 .

[4]  J A Epps,et al.  Field manual on design and construction of seal coats , 1981 .

[5]  Scott Shuler,et al.  A New Laboratory Test for Predicting Very Early Chip Seal Performance , 2009 .

[6]  Ng Major.  A basis for the selection of binders for chip sealing , 1965 .

[7]  Walter Stephens Jordan.  Laboratory evaluation of surface treatments to asphaltic pavements in Mississippi , 2010 .

[8]  P S Kandhal,et al.  CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTING PRECOATED AGGREGATES FOR SEAL COATS AND SURFACE TREATMENTS , 1987 .

[9]  A Kucharek,et al.  Chip Sealing Systems: Improving Early Age Chip Retention , 2006 .

[10]  Isaac L. Howard,et al.  Applicability of Modified Vialit Adhesion Test for Seal Treatment Specifications , 2010 .

[11]  J P Kearby.  TESTS AND THEORIES ON PENETRATION SURFACES , 1953 .

[12]  Scott Shuler.  Design and Construction of Chip Seals for High Traffic Volume , 1998 .

[13]  P Walter.  Sprayed sealing guide , 1991 .

[14]  C. P. Marais.  Rational design of the single surface treatment technique for road maintenance , 1981 .

[15]  Roger Miller,et al.  Design of Experiments A Realistic Approach. , 1975 .

[16]  Jon A Epps,et al.  Laboratory Test Methods and Field Correlations for Predicting the Performance of Chip Seals , 1990 .

[17]  Isaac L. Howard,et al.  Chip and Scrub Seal Binder Evaluation by Frosted Marble Aggregate Retention Test , 2009 .