Can we belong in a neo-liberal world? Neo-liberalism in early childhood education and care policy in Australia and New Zealand

Since the 1990s, neo-liberal economics has profoundly altered the nature and delivery of early childhood education and care in both Australia and New Zealand through the creation of childcare markets. Accompanying the rise of the market has been a discourse of childcare as a commodity – a commodity marketed and sold to its consumers (read parents) as a private benefit. The stratifying impact of neo-liberalism in education policy has been argued by numerous scholars of education. Arguably, in both Australia and New Zealand, early childhood education and care is more commodified and subject to the market than any other area of education. Thus, the authors consider whether early childhood education and care has shifted away from being understood as a social good, a site for social cohesion and democratic practice – all of which the authors consider to be implicated in a conceptualisation of belonging appropriate to the project of early childhood education and care. This article considers the impact of neo-liberal policies on early childhood education and care in Australia and New Zealand, especially in relation to understandings and manifestations of ‘belonging’. The authors trace the impact of neo-liberalism in early childhood education and care policy and examine the ways in which the discourse of early childhood education and care provision has changed, both in policy and in how the market makes its appeal to parents as consumers. The authors argue that appeals to narrowly defined, individualised self-interest and advancement threaten understandings of belonging based on social solidarity and interdependence.

[1]  Judith Loveridge,et al.  Exploring notions of community in a privately owned early childhood education and care centre in New Zealand , 2020 .

[2]  H. Logan Tensions in constructions of quality in Australian early childhood education and care policy history , 2017 .

[3]  J. Tronto There is an alternative: homines curans and the limits of neoliberalism , 2017 .

[4]  R. Breitkreuz,et al.  The framing of Australian childcare policy problems and their solutions , 2017 .

[5]  M. Sims Neoliberalism and early childhood , 2017 .

[6]  J. Sumsion,et al.  The Shaping of Australian Early Childhood Education and Care: What can we learn from a Critical Juncture? , 2016 .

[7]  K. Hyunsook Reclaiming Equality in a Neo-Liberal World , 2015 .

[8]  Hyun-Sook Kim Reclaiming Equality in a Neo-Liberal World , 2015 .

[9]  M. Fleer,et al.  The Theory of ‘Belonging’: Defining concepts used within Belonging, Being and Becoming—The Australian Early Years Learning Framework , 2014 .

[10]  D. Brennan,et al.  Social Investment or Private Profit? Diverging Notions of ‘Investment’ in Early Childhood Education and Care , 2014 .

[11]  Verity Campbell-Barr Childcare markets: can they deliver an equitable service? , 2013 .

[12]  Stephen Kemmis,et al.  Changing Practices, Changing Education , 2013 .

[13]  Lloydetta Quaicoe Theorising immigrant and refugee children ’ s sense of belonging from the perspectives of Bourdieu and postcolonial theory , 2013 .

[14]  S. Staton,et al.  Testing the Vision: Preschool Settings as Places for Meeting, Bonding and Bridging , 2012 .

[15]  P. Moss Need markets be the only show in town , 2012 .

[16]  J. Sumsion,et al.  Interrogating ‘Belonging’ in Belonging, Being and Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia , 2011 .

[17]  Dan Priel Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? , 2010, International Journal of Law in Context.

[18]  B. Geys,et al.  Measuring the ‘Bridging’ versus ‘Bonding’ Nature of Social Networks: A Proposal for Integrating Existing Measures , 2010 .

[19]  M. Kernan Space and place as a source of belonging and participation in urban environments: considering the role of early childhood education and care settings , 2010 .

[20]  Marco Antonsich,et al.  In search of belonging: an analytical framework , 2010 .

[21]  H. Berry,et al.  Longing to Belong: Personal Social Capital and Psychological Distress in an Australian Coastal Region , 2010 .

[22]  E. Stratford Belonging as a Resource: The Case of Ralphs Bay, Tasmania, and the Local Politics of Place , 2009 .

[23]  R. Schein Belonging through Land/Scape , 2009 .

[24]  Employment,et al.  Belonging, being and becoming: the early years learning framework for Australia , 2009 .

[25]  Margaret A. Carr Can assessment unlock and open the doors to resourcefulness and agency , 2008 .

[26]  Ian Hardy,et al.  Enabling praxis: challenges for education , 2008 .

[27]  K. Witten,et al.  The place of schools in parents’ community belonging , 2007 .

[28]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[29]  Gunilla Dahlberg,et al.  Beyond quality in early childhood education and care : postmodern perspectives , 1999 .

[30]  D. Brennan The Politics of Australian Child Care: Philanthropy to Feminism and Beyond , 1998 .

[31]  J. Kelsey The New Zealand Experiment: A World Model for Structural Adjustment ? , 1995 .

[32]  Celia Wolf-Devine,et al.  Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care , 1995 .