A model based on data from echosounder buoys to estimate biomass of fish species associated with fish aggregating devices

Most of the drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs) used in industrial tropical tuna purse seine fisheries are equipped with satellite linked echosounder buoys, which provide fishing crews with remote, accurate geolocation information and rough estimates of FAD-associated tuna biomass. One of the most common brands of echosounder buoys (SATLINK, Madrid, Spain) is currently calibrated for the target strength of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) and provides biomass data on. that species. Using that brand of echosounder buoy, we developed a new behavior-based approach to provide relative biomass estimates and a remote target classification of fish aggregations at FADs. The model is based on current knowledge of the vertical distribution of the main fish species associated with FADs, as well as on appropriate TS and weight values for different species and sizes, and is further based on parameter optimization against a set of fishing operations on DFADs. This model reduced the error variability in biomass estimates by about 60% and also reduced the ranges of underestimation. and overestimation by 55% and 75%, respectively. Similarly, the original coefficients of correlation and determination were also considerably improved from 0.50 and 0.25 to 0.90 and 0.82, respectively. We discuss how this new method opens new opportunities for scientific studies and has implications for sustainable fishing.

[1]  Olav Rune Godø,et al.  Towards an acoustic‐based coupled observation and modelling system for monitoring and predicting ecosystem dynamics of the open ocean , 2013 .

[2]  J. Castro,et al.  A general theory on fish aggregation to floating objects: An alternative to the meeting point hypothesis , 2002, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[3]  Emmanuel Chassot,et al.  Global spatio-temporal patterns in tropical tuna purse seine fisheries on drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs): Taking a historical perspective to inform current challenges , 2013 .

[4]  David Itano,et al.  Behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FADs) , 2007 .

[5]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Generalized Additive Models , 1986 .

[6]  Emmanuel Chassot,et al.  Large-Scale Examination of Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Drifting Fish Aggregating Devices (dFADs) from Tropical Tuna Fisheries of the Indian and Atlantic Oceans , 2015, PloS one.

[7]  K. Anraku,et al.  Association of early juvenile yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares with a network of payaos in the Philippines , 2011, Fisheries Science.

[8]  WilliamsPeter,et al.  Targeting bigger schools can reduce ecosystem impacts of fisheries , 2012 .

[9]  Richard W. Brill,et al.  Vertical movements of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) associated with islands, buoys, and seamounts near the main Hawaiian Islands from archival tagging data , 2003 .

[10]  William N. Venables,et al.  GLMs, GAMs and GLMMs: an overview of theory for applications in fisheries research , 2004 .

[11]  L. Dagorn,et al.  Movement behaviour of skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) and yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) tuna at anchored fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Maldives, investigated by acoustic telemetry , 2013 .

[12]  Mathieu Doray,et al.  Acoustic characterisation of pelagic fish aggregations around moored fish aggregating devices in Martinique (Lesser Antilles) , 2006 .

[13]  Barbara A. Block,et al.  Horizontal movements and depth distribution of large adult yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) near the Hawaiian Islands, recorded using ultrasonic telemetry: implications for the physiological ecology of pelagic fishes , 1999 .

[14]  L. Dagorn,et al.  Behavior of dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) around drifting FADs as observed from automated acoustic receivers , 2007 .

[15]  Daniel W. Fuller,et al.  Simultaneous behavior of skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis), bigeye (Thunnus obsesus), and yellowfin (T. albacares) tunas, within large multi-species aggregations associated with drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the equatorial eastern Pacific Ocean , 2013 .

[16]  Victor Restrepo,et al.  Is it good or bad to fish with FADs? What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems? , 2013 .

[17]  David Itano,et al.  Satellite-linked acoustic receivers to observe behavior of fish in remote areas , 2007 .

[18]  Ch Lai,et al.  Fine‐scale vertical and horizontal movements of juvenile yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) associated with a subsurface fish aggregating device (FAD) off southwestern Taiwan , 2013 .

[19]  Jon Lopez,et al.  Evolution and current state of the technology of echo-sounder buoys used by Spanish tropical tuna purse seiners in the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific Oceans , 2014 .

[20]  David Itano,et al.  Characterizing fish communities associated with drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Western Indian Ocean using underwater visual surveys , 2007 .

[21]  K. Anraku,et al.  Telemetry study on juvenile yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares around a payao in the Philippines , 2009 .

[22]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations , 1995 .

[23]  J. Hampton,et al.  Vertical Behavior and the Observation of FAD Effects on Tropical Tuna in the Warm-Pool of the Western Pacific Ocean , 2009 .

[24]  Patrice Brehmer,et al.  Echotrace classification and spatial distribution of pelagic fish aggregations around drifting fish aggregating devices (DFAD) , 2007 .