Ossicle Reinforced Porous Structure for Variable Stiffness Soft Actuator Inspired From Echinoderms

The variable stiffness capability can broaden the range of applications by providing both the adaptability through conformability inherent in soft robots and the ability to transmit large forces and high payloads in a rigid state. The stiffness modulation ability of compliant-bodied living creatures, according to the tasks, makes them interact efficiently with unstructured surroundings. The design of stiffness–modulation structures and methods, which can be well incorporated with the flexible body of a soft robot, can be informed by animal physiology. This study presents an echinoderm-inspired stiffness-modulation method with a rigid structure reinforced with porous material actuated by vacuum, causing deformation and compressive force. We demonstrate a continuative stiffness change (15-fold increase), and the device is shown to be mechanically programmable. Furthermore, we apply the proposed method to the gripper and robotic paw to demonstrate the advantages of stiffness modulation in the soft robotics. Consequently, it was demonstrated that the stiffness of a soft robot can be increased in situations requiring a higher load-bearing capacity or impact response tuning, while retaining its inherent adaptability.

[1]  Brian Byunghyun Kang,et al.  Slider-Tendon Linear Actuator With Under-Actuation and Fast-Connection for Soft Wearable Robots , 2021, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[2]  Ayoung Hong,et al.  Ascidian-Inspired Soft Robots That Can Crawl, Tumble, and Pick-and-Place Objects , 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[3]  H. Harry Asada,et al.  Otariidae-Inspired Soft-Robotic Supernumerary Flippers by Fabric Kirigami and Origami , 2020, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[4]  Kyu-Jin Cho,et al.  Tendon-Driven Jamming Mechanism for Configurable Variable Stiffness. , 2020, Soft robotics.

[5]  Yong Hu,et al.  Adaptive Variable Stiffness Particle Phalange for Robust and Durable Robotic Grasping. , 2020, Soft robotics.

[6]  Margherita Brancadoro,et al.  Fiber Jamming Transition as a Stiffening Mechanism for Soft Robotics. , 2020, Soft robotics.

[7]  Tianmiao Wang,et al.  Octopus Arm-Inspired Tapered Soft Actuators with Suckers for Improved Grasping. , 2020, Soft robotics.

[8]  Xin-Yu Guo,et al.  Self-locking mechanism for variable stiffness rigid–soft gripper , 2020, Smart Materials and Structures.

[9]  Yimin Song,et al.  A soft gripper with variable stiffness inspired by pangolin scales, toothed pneumatic actuator and autonomous controller , 2020, Robotics Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[10]  Quan-Sheng Jiang,et al.  Soft Actuator Model for a Soft Robot With Variable Stiffness by Coupling Pneumatic Structure and Jamming Mechanism , 2020, IEEE Access.

[11]  Michael Yu Wang,et al.  Hybrid Jamming for Bioinspired Soft Robotic Fingers. , 2019, Soft robotics.

[12]  H. Rodrigue,et al.  Long Shape Memory Alloy Tendon-based Soft Robotic Actuators and Implementation as a Soft Gripper , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Design, Fabrication, and Characterization of an Untethered Amphibious Sea Urchin-Inspired Robot , 2019, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[14]  Jung Kim,et al.  Echinoderm Inspired Variable Stiffness Soft Actuator with Connected Ossicle Structure , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[15]  Yingtian Li,et al.  Soft Robotic Grippers Based on Particle Transmission , 2019, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[16]  Carmel Majidi,et al.  Bio-inspired soft robotics: Material selection, actuation, and design , 2018, Extreme Mechanics Letters.

[17]  M. Veloso,et al.  The grand challenges of Science Robotics , 2018, Science Robotics.

[18]  Matthew A. Robertson,et al.  New soft robots really suck: Vacuum-powered systems empower diverse capabilities , 2017, Science Robotics.

[19]  Joseph D. Greer,et al.  A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth , 2017, Science Robotics.

[20]  M. Elphick,et al.  Body wall structure in the starfish Asterias rubens , 2017, Journal of anatomy.

[21]  Alain Delchambre,et al.  Flexible Medical Devices: Review of Controllable Stiffness Solutions , 2017 .

[22]  Amir Firouzeh,et al.  An under-actuated origami gripper with adjustable stiffness joints for multiple grasp modes , 2017 .

[23]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  JammJoint: A Variable Stiffness Device Based on Granular Jamming for Wearable Joint Support , 2017, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[24]  M. Elphick,et al.  Interfibrillar stiffening of echinoderm mutable collagenous tissue demonstrated at the nanoscale , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Mariangela Manti,et al.  Stiffening in Soft Robotics: A Review of the State of the Art , 2016, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[26]  William M. Kier,et al.  The Musculature of Coleoid Cephalopod Arms and Tentacles , 2016, Front. Cell Dev. Biol..

[27]  Mehrdad R. Kermani,et al.  Design and Performance Evaluation of a Prototype MRF-Based Haptic Interface for Medical Applications , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[28]  Sanlin S. Robinson,et al.  Poroelastic Foams for Simple Fabrication of Complex Soft Robots , 2015, Advanced materials.

[29]  KovačMirko,et al.  The Bioinspiration Design Paradigm: A Perspective for Soft Robotics , 2014 .

[30]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics , 2007, Science.

[31]  I. Wilkie Is muscle involved in the mechanical adaptability of echinoderm mutable collagenous tissue? , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[32]  M. Byrne The morphology of autotomy structures in the sea cucumber Eupentacta quinquesemita before and during evisceration. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[33]  P O'Neill,et al.  Structure and mechanics of starfish body wall. , 1989, The Journal of experimental biology.

[34]  Matheus S. Xavier,et al.  Soft Pneumatic Actuators: A Review of Design, Fabrication, Modeling, Sensing, Control and Applications , 2022, IEEE Access.