Post-occupancy evaluation in architecture: experiences and perspectives from UK practice

ABSTRACT The importance of post-occupancy evaluation (POE) is widely acknowledged in the academic literature, industry press and, increasingly, by professional institutes. Learning from previous projects systematically is central to improving building performance, resulting in a built environment that better fits the needs of clients, end users, wider society and the environment. The key role of architects in pushing forward this agenda has been recognized, however evidence suggests that take up of POE is low across the profession. Whilst research has investigated barriers to POE across the construction industry, very little has considered the unique perspective of architects. In-depth interviews with UK-based architects are presented to explore their experiences in relation to POE and their perspectives on its potential to be a standard part of architectural practice. The findings indicate that a considerable amount of practical work is being undertaken, but uncertainty over what constitutes POE means it is often excluded from the POE label – with significant implications for the development of a rigorous evidence base. An appetite is identified for more holistic evaluation measures that move beyond the current preoccupation with energy efficiency to consider other aspects of building performance, and thereby sustainability, in a wider value framework.

[1]  Robert Schmidt,et al.  Improving the design process for adaptability: linking feedback and architectural values , 2011 .

[2]  Olivia Guerra-Santin,et al.  In-use monitoring of buildings: An overview of data collection methods , 2015 .

[3]  S. Merriam Qualitative Case Studies , 2010 .

[4]  F. Duffy,et al.  Professionalism and architects in the 21st century , 2013 .

[5]  Fionn Stevenson,et al.  Post-occupancy evaluation and sustainability: a review , 2009 .

[6]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser Continuous quality improvement through post‐occupancy evaluation feedback , 2003 .

[7]  Hom B. Rijal,et al.  Developing occupancy feedback from a prototype to improve housing production , 2010 .

[8]  W. Hughes,et al.  Professionalism and professional institutions in times of change , 2013 .

[9]  Ying Hua,et al.  Completing the missing link in building design process: Enhancing post-occupancy evaluation method for effective feedback for building performance , 2015 .

[10]  B. Bordass,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 2: technical performance of the Probe buildings , 2001 .

[11]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[12]  Marianne Davys,et al.  RIBA Plan of Work , 2019, Small Practice and the Sole Practitioner.

[13]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Building evaluation: practice and principles , 2010 .

[14]  Rajat Gupta,et al.  Intent and outcomes from the Retrofit for the Future programme: key lessons , 2015 .

[15]  Wolfgang F.E. Preiser Feedback, feedforward and control: post-occupancy evaluation to the rescue , 2001 .

[16]  Max Paul Deuble,et al.  Is it hot in here or is it just me? Validating the post-occupancy evaluation , 2014 .

[17]  Valkiria Durán-Narucki School building condition, school attendance, and academic achievement in New York City public schools : A mediation model , 2008 .

[18]  Tom Wengraf,et al.  Qualitative Research Interviewing , 2001 .

[19]  A. Crane Rethinking construction. , 1999, Health estate.

[20]  Look and learn. , 2010, Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi.

[21]  Sarah Barnes,et al.  The design of caring environments and the quality of life of older people , 2002, Ageing and Society.

[22]  David M. Gann,et al.  Design Quality Indicator as a tool for thinking , 2003 .

[23]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: A portfolio of feedback techniques , 2005 .

[24]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Productivity in buildings: the ‘killer’ variables , 1999 .

[25]  Judith Torrington,et al.  Evaluating quality of life in residential care buildings , 2007 .

[26]  Karim Hadjri,et al.  Post‐occupancy evaluation: purpose, benefits and barriers , 2009 .

[27]  Communities Code for Sustainable Homes , 2013 .

[28]  J. Vischer Applying knowledge on building performance: From evidence to intelligence , 2009 .

[29]  Lynne Armitage,et al.  The human green office experience: Happy and healthy or sick and frustrated? , 2013 .

[30]  Robert W. Marans,et al.  Enhancing building performance , 2013 .

[31]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  The need to improve double‐loop learning and design‐construction feedback loops , 2013 .

[32]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  Assessing building performance , 2005 .

[33]  William Allen Forum: The conduct of building research , 1998 .

[34]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[35]  Jez Wingfield,et al.  A socio-technical approach to post-occupancy evaluation: interactive adaptability in domestic retrofit , 2014 .

[36]  Frank Duffy Forum Linking theory back to practice , 2008 .

[37]  Sebastian Macmillan Designing Better Building , 2004 .

[38]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 1: the Probe process , 2001 .

[39]  S Macmillan The value handbook: getting the most from your buildings and spaces. , 2006 .

[40]  C. Zimring,et al.  A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design , 2008, HERD.

[41]  M. Pacione Applied geography: in pursuit of useful knowledge , 1999 .

[42]  J. Fairclough,et al.  RETHINKING CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION AND RESEARCH - A REVIEW OF THE GOVERNMENT'S R&D POLICIES AND PRACTICES , 2002 .

[43]  N. Wells,et al.  Housing quality, psychological distress, and the mediating role of social withdrawal : A longitudinal study of low-income women , 2007 .

[44]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  ASSESSING BUILDING PERFORMANCE: ITS EVOLUTION FROM POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION , 2008 .

[45]  Hans Lind Sustainable Buildings in Practice: What the Users Think , 2012 .

[46]  Christhina Candido,et al.  BOSSA: a multidimensional post-occupancy evaluation tool , 2016 .

[47]  James Evans,et al.  Re-conceiving building design quality: A review of building users in their social context , 2014, Indoor + built environment : the journal of the International Society of the Built Environment.

[48]  D. M. Gann,et al.  Closing the loop between design and use: post-occupancy evaluation , 2001 .

[49]  Anne Dye,et al.  Demystifying Architectural Research: Adding Value to Your Practice , 2016 .

[50]  Andrew Miles Code for sustainable homes , 2010 .

[51]  Bill Bordass,et al.  Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 2: Soft landings – involving design and building teams in improving performance , 2005 .

[52]  F. Guillemette,et al.  Qualitative Research Interviewing , 2003 .

[53]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Evaluating housing performance in relation to human behaviour: new challenges , 2010 .

[54]  Steven Ruddock Creating Impact in Healthcare Design: Assessment through Design Evaluation , 2006 .

[55]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of the Probe buildings , 2001 .

[56]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Design quality, its measurement and management in the built environment , 2003 .

[57]  Ian Cooper,et al.  Post-occupancy evaluation - where are you? , 2001 .