Hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors: an effective solution for upgrading a large wastewater treatment plant.

Over the last few years there has been a growing attention regarding the receiving water body quality state. As a matter of a fact, the Directive 91/271 of the European Union (EU) replaced the "emission standard" concept that fixes discharge limits depending on polluting emission characteristics, with the "stream standard" concept that fixes discharge limits for each polluting substance depending on self-depurative characteristics of the RWB. In this context, several WWTPs need to be upgraded in order to meet stricter effluent limits. The need of WWTP upgrading was also emphasized by the growing urbanization that have led, in most cases, to get overloaded WWTP due to an overcoming of the maximum WWTP capacity. In order to upgrade existing WWTP basically two main possibilities can be chosen: building new tanks or modify the WWTP by introducing new technologies such as the HMBBR systems. In this paper, such latter possibility was explored and as a case study an existing Italian WWTP (Acqua dei Corsari) located in Palermo (IT) was analysed. The main goal was to test the effectiveness of HMBBR systems with respect to the WWTP upgrading. The survey was carried out by means of model simulation and an HMBBR pilot plant. This latter was employed for the evaluation of the model parameters as well as kinetic coefficients for the HMBBR. The model results are encouraging towards the WWTP upgrading by means of HMBBR. As a matter of fact, the model simulation results showed that the WWTP maximum capacity can be upgraded from 480,000 up to one million PE.

[1]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[2]  M. Ragazzi,et al.  Experimental comparison between MBBR and activated sludge system for the treatment of municipal wastewater , 2000 .

[3]  C. W. Randall,et al.  Computer Program Development for the Design of Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Processes , 2005 .

[4]  J. B. Watts,et al.  Dynamic Modelling of an ASP Sewage Works – A Case Study , 1993 .

[5]  B. Rusten,et al.  Upgrading to nitrogen removal with the kmt moving bed biofilm process , 1994 .

[6]  C. W. Randall,et al.  Full-scale evaluation of an integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) process for enhanced nitrogen removal , 1996 .

[7]  C. Dagot,et al.  Wastewater treatment in a hybrid activated sludge baffled reactor. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  Hallvard Ødegaard,et al.  Nitrification of municipal wastewater in moving-bed biofilm reactors , 1995 .

[9]  Glen T. Daigger,et al.  Evaluation of IAWQ Activated Sludge Model No. 2 using steady‐state data from four full‐scale wastewater treatment plants , 1998 .

[10]  David A. Dzombak,et al.  Biokinetic modeling and scale-up considerations for rotating biological contactors , 1992 .

[11]  M. Morper,et al.  Improvement of Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants' Efficiencies without Enlargement of Tankage by Application of the Linpor-Process – Case Studies , 1990 .

[12]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Improved design and control of industrial and municipal nutrient removal plants using dynamic models , 1997 .

[13]  Mogens Henze,et al.  PERFORMANCE AND MODEL CALIBRATION OF R-D-N PROCESSES IN PILOT PLANT , 1994 .

[14]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 , 2015 .

[15]  P. Foladori,et al.  Dairy wastewater treatment in a moving bed biofilm reactor. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[16]  R. Canziani,et al.  Organic carbon and nitrogen removal in moving-bed biofilm reactors , 1997 .

[17]  Hallvard Ødegaard,et al.  Nitrogen removal from dilute wastewater in cold climate using moving‐bed biofilm reactors , 1995 .

[18]  J. Rintala,et al.  Comparison of laboratory-scale thermophilic biofilm and activated sludge processes integrated with a mesophilic activated sludge process. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[19]  C. W. Randall,et al.  Evaluation of Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Processes at High Mean Cells Residence Time and Low Temperatures , 2005 .

[20]  T. Lessel.  Upgrading and nitrification by submerged bio-film reactors - experiences from a large scale plant , 1994 .

[21]  H. Ødegaard,et al.  Biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal in a sequencing batch moving bed biofilm reactor. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[22]  Hallvard Ødegaard,et al.  Moving bed biofilm reactors and chemical precipitation for high efficiency treatment of wastewater from small communities , 1997 .

[23]  D Di Trapani,et al.  Hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors: a pilot plant experiment. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[24]  P. Dold,et al.  Importance and measurement of decay rate when assessing nitrification kinetics. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[25]  Hallvard Ødegaard,et al.  A new moving bed biofilm reactor - applications and results , 1994 .

[26]  Anders Löfqvist,et al.  Upgrading aerated lagoons at pulp and paper mills , 1997 .

[27]  Bruce E. Rittmann,et al.  Simplified design of biofilm processes using normalized loading curves , 1990 .

[28]  N Hvala,et al.  Simulation study supporting wastewater treatment plant upgrading. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[29]  G Mannina,et al.  Modelling of hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors: a pilot plant experiment. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[30]  B. Mattiasson,et al.  Denitrification at low temperatures using a suspended carrier biofilm process. , 2003, Water research.

[31]  Hallvard Ødegaard,et al.  Innovations in wastewater treatment: the moving bed biofilm process. , 2006 .

[32]  J. J. Heijnen,et al.  Modelling biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal in a full scale activated sludge process , 1999 .

[33]  J. Keller,et al.  Suspended carrier technology allows upgrading high-rate activated sludge plants for nitrogen removal via process intensification , 2000 .

[34]  N. Müller.  Implementing biofilm carriers into activated sludge process — 15 years of experience , 1998 .

[35]  M. Hamoda,et al.  Performance of a combined biofilm-suspended growth system for wastewater treatment , 2000 .

[36]  Mogens Henze,et al.  The Activated Sludge Model No. 2: Biological Phosphorus Removal , 1995 .

[37]  I. Lo,et al.  Removal of rate-limiting organic substances in a hybrid biological reactor , 1995 .

[38]  P. Pearce,et al.  Evaluation of hybrid processes for nitrification by comparing MBBR/AS and IFAS configurations. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[39]  F. Gebara.  Activated sludge biofilm wastewater treatment system , 1999 .

[40]  Maynard Thompson,et al.  Mathematical Modeling and Computer Simulation , 2005 .

[41]  J. Tay,et al.  A hybrid anaerobic solid-liquid system for food waste digestion. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[42]  Roberto Canziani,et al.  Phosphorus and Nitrogen Removal in Moving-Bed Sequencing Batch Biofilm Reactors , 1999 .

[43]  I. Takács.  A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process , 1991 .