Uncoupling of sgRNAs from their associated barcodes during PCR amplification of combinatorial CRISPR screens

Many implementations of pooled screens in mammalian cells rely on linking an element of interest to a barcode, with the latter subsequently quantitated by next generation sequencing. However, substantial uncoupling between these paired elements during lentiviral production has been reported, especially as the distance between elements increases. We detail that PCR amplification is another major source of uncoupling, and becomes more pronounced with increased amounts of DNA template molecules and PCR cycles. To lessen uncoupling in systems that use paired elements for detection, we recommend minimizing the distance between elements, using low and equal template DNA inputs for plasmid and genomic DNA during PCR, and minimizing the number of PCR cycles. We also present a vector design for conducting combinatorial CRISPR screens that enables accurate barcode-based detection with a single short sequencing read and minimal uncoupling.

[1]  Vanja Klepac-Ceraj,et al.  PCR-Induced Sequence Artifacts and Bias: Insights from Comparison of Two 16S rRNA Clone Libraries Constructed from the Same Sample , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  Gaelen T. Hess,et al.  Synergistic drug combinations for cancer identified in a CRISPR screen for pairwise genetic interactions , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  Wei-Shau Hu,et al.  Genetic consequences of packaging two RNA genomes in one retroviral particle: pseudodiploidy and high rate of genetic recombination. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  CRISPR/Cas9 screening using unique molecular identifiers , 2017 .

[5]  Aaron N. Chang,et al.  Combinatorial CRISPR-Cas9 screens for de novo mapping of genetic interactions , 2017, Nature Methods.

[6]  Thomas M. Norman,et al.  A Multiplexed Single-Cell CRISPR Screening Platform Enables Systematic Dissection of the Unfolded Protein Response , 2016, Cell.

[7]  John G Doench,et al.  Am I ready for CRISPR? A user's guide to genetic screens , 2017, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  Meagan E. Sullender,et al.  Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9 , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  C. Wilson,et al.  Stimulation and suppression of PCR-mediated recombination. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Thomas M. Norman,et al.  Perturb-Seq: Dissecting Molecular Circuits with Scalable Single-Cell RNA Profiling of Pooled Genetic Screens , 2016, Cell.

[11]  S. Odelberg,et al.  Template-switching during DNA synthesis by Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  B. Cohen,et al.  A genome-integrated massively parallel reporter assay reveals DNA sequence determinants of cis-regulatory activity in neural cells , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  M. Polz,et al.  Heteroduplexes in mixed-template amplifications: formation, consequence and elimination by 'reconditioning PCR'. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  Michael T. McManus,et al.  Dual gene activation and knockout screen reveals directional dependencies in genetic networks , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  G. Weiller,et al.  PCR amplification of murine immunoglobulin germline V genes: Strategies for minimization of recombination artefacts , 1998, Immunology and cell biology.

[16]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Massively Parallel Reporter Assays in Cultured Mammalian Cells , 2014, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[17]  Jay Shendure,et al.  High-resolution analysis of DNA regulatory elements by synthetic saturation mutagenesis , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Kendall R. Sanson,et al.  Orthologous CRISPR-Cas9 enzymes for Combinatorial Genetic Screens , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Timothy K Lu,et al.  Multiplexed barcoded CRISPR-Cas9 screening enabled by CombiGEM , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  André F. Rendeiro,et al.  Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome read-out , 2017, Nature Methods.

[21]  A. McKenna,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Scanning for Regulatory Elements Required for HPRT1 Expression via Thousands of Large, Programmed Genomic Deletions. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  Paul C. Blainey,et al.  Lentiviral co-packaging mitigates the effects of intermolecular recombination and multiple integrations in pooled genetic screens , 2018, bioRxiv.

[23]  T. Lenz,et al.  Simple approach to reduce PCR artefact formation leads to reliable genotyping of MHC and other highly polymorphic loci--implications for evolutionary analysis. , 2008, Gene.

[24]  A. Meyerhans,et al.  DNA recombination during PCR. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  Richard W. Hamming,et al.  Error detecting and error correcting codes , 1950 .

[26]  G. Hon,et al.  Frequent sgRNA-barcode recombination in single-cell perturbation assays , 2018, bioRxiv.

[27]  Jizhong Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of PCR-Generated Chimeras, Mutations, and Heteroduplexes with 16S rRNA Gene-Based Cloning , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[28]  S. Pääbo,et al.  DNA damage promotes jumping between templates during enzymatic amplification. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[29]  Daniel J. O'Connell,et al.  Simultaneous Pathway Activity Inference and Gene Expression Analysis Using RNA Sequencing. , 2016, Cell systems.

[30]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  On the design of CRISPR-based single cell molecular screens , 2018 .

[31]  G. Wang,et al.  The frequency of chimeric molecules as a consequence of PCR co-amplification of 16S rRNA genes from different bacterial species. , 1996, Microbiology.

[32]  Qikai Xu,et al.  Sources of Error in Mammalian Genetic Screens , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[33]  T. Kivioja,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 screening using unique molecular identifiers , 2017, bioRxiv.

[34]  R. Nitsch,et al.  CRISPR-UMI: single-cell lineage tracing of pooled CRISPR–Cas9 screens , 2017, Nature Methods.