Simultaneous utilization of glucose, xylose and arabinose in the presence of acetate by a consortium of Escherichia coli strains

BackgroundThe efficient microbial utilization of lignocellulosic hydrolysates has remained challenging because this material is composed of multiple sugars and also contains growth inhibitors such as acetic acid (acetate). Using an engineered consortium of strains derived from Escherichia coli C and a synthetic medium containing acetate, glucose, xylose and arabinose, we report on both the microbial removal of acetate and the subsequent simultaneous utilization of the sugars.ResultsIn a first stage, a strain unable to utilize glucose, xylose and arabinose (ALS1392, strain E. coli C ptsG manZ glk crr xylA araA) removed 3 g/L acetate within 30 hours. In a subsequent second stage, three E. coli strains (ALS1370, ALS1371, ALS1391), which are each engineered to utilize only one sugar, together simultaneously utilized glucose, xylose and arabinose. The effect of non-metabolizable sugars on the metabolism of the target sugar was minimal. Additionally the deletions necessary to prevent the consumption of one sugar only minimally affected the consumption of a desired sugar. For example, the crr deletion necessary to prevent glucose consumption reduced xylose and arabinose utilization by less than 15% compared to the wild-type. Similarly, the araA deletion used to exclude arabinose consumption did not affect xylose- and glucose-consumption.ConclusionsDespite the modest reduction in the overall rate of sugar consumption due to the various deletions that were required to generate the consortium of strains, the approach constitutes a significant improvement in any single-organism approach to utilize sugars found in lignocellulosic hydrolysate in the presence of acetate.

[1]  H. Wenzl,et al.  The Chemical Technology of Wood , 1970 .

[2]  Yanli Chen Development and application of co-culture for ethanol production by co-fermentation of glucose and xylose: a systematic review , 2011, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[3]  Ian R. Booth,et al.  Perturbation of Anion Balance during Inhibition of Growth of Escherichia coli by Weak Acids , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  H. Mori,et al.  Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[5]  B. Hahn-Hägerdal,et al.  Arabinose and xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing a fungal pentose utilization pathway , 2009, Microbial cell factories.

[6]  F. Bolivar,et al.  Pathway engineering for the production of aromatic compounds in Escherichia coli , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Ignacio Ballesteros,et al.  Effect of inhibitors released during steam-explosion pretreatment of barley straw on enzymatic hydrolysis , 2006, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[8]  Henner,et al.  Cloning and sequencing of the xylose isomerase and xylulose kinase genes of Escherichia coli , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[9]  R. Ebright Transcription activation at Class I CAP‐dependent promoters , 1993, Molecular microbiology.

[10]  A. Danchin,et al.  The regulation of Enzyme IIAGlc expression controls adenylate cyclase activity in Escherichia coli , 2022 .

[11]  M. Eiteman,et al.  Optimization of the ion-exchange analysis of organic acids from fermentation , 1997 .

[12]  A. Wiselogel,et al.  Biomass feedstock resources and composition , 1997 .

[13]  P. Postma,et al.  cAMP receptor protein-cAMP plays a crucial role in glucose-lactose diauxie by activating the major glucose transporter gene in Escherichia coli. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  M. Eiteman,et al.  Microbial removal of acetate selectively from sugar mixtures , 2011, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[15]  A. Danchin,et al.  The regulation of Enzyme IIA(Glc) expression controls adenylate cyclase activity in Escherichia coli. , 2002, Microbiology.

[16]  Sarah A. Lee,et al.  A substrate‐selective co‐fermentation strategy with Escherichia coli produces lactate by simultaneously consuming xylose and glucose , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  A Martinez,et al.  Effects of Ca(OH)(2) treatments ("overliming") on the composition and toxicity of bagasse hemicellulose hydrolysates. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  B. Dien,et al.  Use of catabolite repression mutants for fermentation of sugar mixtures to ethanol , 2001, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[19]  N. Qureshi,et al.  Engineering industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for xylose fermentation and comparison for switchgrass conversion , 2011, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[20]  F. Bolivar,et al.  Characterization of sugar mixtures utilization by an Escherichia coli mutant devoid of the phosphotransferase system , 2001, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[21]  C. Park,et al.  Priority of pentose utilization at the level of transcription: arabinose, xylose, and ribose operons. , 1998, Molecules and cells.

[22]  Sarah A. Lee,et al.  A co-fermentation strategy to consume sugar mixtures effectively , 2008, Journal of biological engineering.

[23]  M. Morange,et al.  Microbial Cell Factories , 2006 .

[24]  R. Ebright,et al.  Transcription activation at Class II CAP‐dependent promoters , 1993, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  B. Dien,et al.  Fermentation of sugar mixtures using Escherichia coli catabolite repression mutants engineered for production of L-lactic acid , 2002, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[26]  B. Erni,et al.  Membrane topology of the mannose transporter of Escherichia coli K12. , 1996, European journal of biochemistry.

[27]  M. Sedlák,et al.  DNA microarray analysis of the expression of the genes encoding the major enzymes in ethanol production during glucose and xylose co-fermentation by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces yeast , 2003 .

[28]  W. Epstein,et al.  Phosphorylation of D-glucose in Escherichia coli mutants defective in glucosephosphotransferase, mannosephosphotransferase, and glucokinase , 1975, Journal of bacteriology.

[29]  Christopher V. Rao,et al.  Regulation of Arabinose and Xylose Metabolism in Escherichia coli , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  G R Jacobson,et al.  Phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase systems of bacteria. , 1993, Microbiological reviews.

[31]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration , 2001, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[32]  Heidi J Sofia,et al.  Phylogeny of the bacterial superfamily of Crp-Fnr transcription regulators: exploiting the metabolic spectrum by controlling alternative gene programs. , 2003, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[33]  M. Galbe,et al.  Reduced inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. , 2001, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[34]  Ryan T Gill,et al.  Elucidating acetate tolerance in E. coli using a genome-wide approach. , 2011, Metabolic engineering.

[35]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Catabolite Gene Activator Protein Mutations Affecting Activity of the araBAD Promoter , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  P. Postma,et al.  Mutation in the crp gene of Salmonella typhimurium which interferes with inducer exclusion , 1980, Journal of bacteriology.

[37]  C. Wyman Handbook on bioethanol : production and utilization , 1996 .

[38]  E. Englesberg ENZYMATIC CHARACTERIZATION OF 17 l-ARABINOSE NEGATIVE MUTANTS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI , 1961, Journal of bacteriology.

[39]  B. Wanner,et al.  One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Milton H. Saier,et al.  Transcriptome Analysis of Crp-Dependent Catabolite Control of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.