Monetary Valuation of Aircraft Noise

In densely-populated countries and in particular in large metropolitan areas, the presence of so much human activity causes all sorts of negative externalities, for example traffic noise disturbance. These externalities call for corrective measures by the government. Economists have developed a number of procedures that provide reasonable estimates on the monetary value of some amenities and externalities. In this paper we develop a spatially-explicit hedonic pricing model for house prices in order to quantify the social cost of aircraft noise disturbance in monetary terms. While focusing on aircraft noise around Amsterdam airport in the urban fringe of the Amsterdam region, a key point in our analysis is that we account for background noise. We do this by taking multiple sources of traffic noise (i.e. road, railway and aircraft noise) into account simultaneously and by setting threshold values for all three sources of noise above which sound is generally experienced as nuisance. Based on our regression results we conclude that a higher noise level means ceteris paribus a lower house price. Air traffic has the largest price impact, followed by railway traffic and road traffic. These model outcomes can subsequently be used to estimate the marginal and total benefits of aircraft noise reduction in the studied area around Amsterdam airport. We find a marginal benefit of 1 dB noise reduction of 1,459 Euro per house, leading to a total benefit of 1 dB noise reduction of 574 million Euros.

[1]  J. M. Fields,et al.  Comparing the relationships between noise level and annoyance in different surveys - A railway noise vs. aircraft and road traffic comparison , 1982 .

[2]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Lagrange Multiplier Test Diagnostics for Spatial Dependence and Spatial Heterogeneity , 2010 .

[3]  P. Johansson.  Cost-benefit analysis of environmental change , 1994 .

[4]  S. M. Taylor,et al.  Transportation noise annoyance: Testing of a probabilistic model , 1987 .

[5]  Jasper Dekkers,et al.  How Much Noise Reduction at Airports , 2007 .

[6]  Anil K. Bera,et al.  Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence , 1996 .

[7]  Mark Lijesen,et al.  Geluidsnormen voor Schiphol, een welvaartseconomische benadering , 2006 .

[8]  Lars Nesheim,et al.  Identification and Estimation of Hedonic Models , 2003, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  H. Miedema,et al.  Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  Frank Bruinsma,et al.  De prijs van een reis: de maatschappelijke kosten van het verkeer , 2004 .

[11]  I. Bateman,et al.  The Effect of Road Traffic on Residential Property Values: A Literature Review and Hedonic Pricing Study , 2006 .

[12]  Raymond B. Palmquist.  Property Value Models , 2005 .

[13]  L. Anselin.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .

[14]  B. Baarsma,et al.  Using Happiness Surveys to Value Intangibles: The Case of Airport Noise , 2004 .

[15]  Clifford Winston,et al.  Fundamental Flaws of Social Regulation: The Case of Airplane Noise* , 1999, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[16]  G. W. Johnston,et al.  Traffic background level and signal duration effects on aircraft noise judgment , 1979 .

[17]  Per-Olov Johansson,et al.  The Economic Theory and Measurement of Environmental Benefits , 1987 .

[18]  Jon P. Nelson,et al.  META-ANALYSIS OF AIRPORT NOISE AND HEDONIC PROPERTY VALUES : PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS , 2004 .