Usefulness of Mean Corpuscular Volume for Detection of Advanced Colorectal Cancer in Patients Older than 85 Years

Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to elucidate clinical indicators for the detection of advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary hospital. This study included 333 patients older than 85 years who underwent colonoscopy from April 2006 to May 2010. The detection rate of ACRC was assessed. Then, we analyzed the association between the detection of ACRC and various background factors including mean corpuscular volume (MCV). We also analyzed the cumulative overall survival of patients with detected ACRC. Results: ACRC was found in 37 patients, resulting in a detection rate of 15%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a decreased MCV was an independent predictor for the detection of ACRC (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84–0.94), whereas symptoms such as abdominal pain, hematochezia, or anemia were not independent predictors. MCV was an independent predictor irrespective of the location of the tumor. The cumulative survival rates at 3 and 5 years after diagnosis were 78 and 58%, respectively, during a median observational period of 30.3 months. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the usefulness of MCV as an indicator of the necessity of colonoscopy for older patients.

[1]  M. Floer,et al.  Endoscopic Improvement of the Adenoma Detection Rate during Colonoscopy - Where Do We Stand in 2015? , 2016, Digestion.

[2]  J. Cangemi,et al.  Decreased Risk of Colorectal Cancer after Colonoscopy in Patients 76-85 Years Old in the United States , 2015, Digestion.

[3]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[4]  A. Zauber,et al.  Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  L. Walter,et al.  Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  M. Kimmey,et al.  Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon. , 2010, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[7]  D. Ransohoff,et al.  Adverse Events After Outpatient Colonoscopy in the Medicare Population , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  G. Triadafilopoulos,et al.  Risk of perforation from a colonoscopy in adults: a large population-based study. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[9]  T. Gotoda,et al.  Endoscopic indications for endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumours in the colorectum , 2006, Gut.

[10]  Charles J. Lightdale,et al.  Update on the Paris Classification of Superficial Neoplastic Lesions in the Digestive Tract , 2005, Endoscopy.

[11]  E T Stewart,et al.  A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  C. Morris,et al.  Early detection of carcinomas of the right colon: role of hemoglobin and mean corpuscular volume. , 1986, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[13]  A. Okuş,et al.  Is early detection of colon cancer possible with red blood cell distribution width? , 2015, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[14]  Dennie V. Jones,et al.  The value of a complete blood count in predicting cancer of the colon. , 2004, Cancer detection and prevention.

[15]  J. Grem Lower Gastrointestinal Cancer , 2001 .