Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine imaging predictors of aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and the agreement and reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), cardiac computed tomography (CCT), and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in aortic root assessment. BACKGROUND The optimal imaging strategy for planning TAVI is unclear with a paucity of comparative multimodality imaging data. The association between aortic root morphology and outcomes after TAVI also remains incompletely understood. METHODS A total of 202 consecutive patients assessed by CMR, CCT, and TTE for TAVI were studied. Agreement and variability among and within imaging modalities was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Postoperative AR was assessed by TTE. RESULTS Of the 202 patients undergoing TAVI assessment with both CMR and TTE, 133 also underwent CCT. Close agreement was observed between CMR and CCT in dimensions of the aortic annulus (bias, -0.4 mm; 95% limits of agreement: -5.7 to 5.0 mm), and similarly for sinus of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, and ascending aortic measures. Agreement between TTE-derived measures and either CMR or CCT was less precise. Intraobserver and interobserver variability were lowest with CMR. The presence and severity of AR after TAVI were associated with larger aortic valve annulus measurements by both CMR (p = 0.03) and CCT (p = 0.04) but not TTE-derived measures (p = 0.10). Neither CCT nor CMR measures of annulus eccentricity, however, predicted AR after TAVI (p = 0.33 and p = 0.78, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing imaging assessment for TAVI, the presence and severity of AR after TAVI were associated with larger aortic annulus measurements by both CMR and CCT, but not TTE. Both CMR and CCT provide highly reproducible information in the assessment of patients undergoing TAVI.

[1]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  A. Stillman,et al.  Can balloon aortic valvuloplasty help determine appropriate transcatheter aortic valve size? , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  R. Levine,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. , 2003, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  Friedhelm Beyersdorf,et al.  Preoperative assessment of aortic annulus dimensions: comparison of noninvasive and intraoperative measurement. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Role of Multi-slice Computed Tomography to Evaluate Prosthesis Positioning and Deployment in Relation to Valve Function , 2009 .

[6]  R. Tölg,et al.  Anatomic and procedural predictors of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve bioprosthesis. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  N. Al-Attar,et al.  Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: a position statement from the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). , 2008, European heart journal.

[8]  Jennifer Keegan,et al.  Aortic Root Measurement by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Specification of Planes and Lines of Measurement and Corresponding Normal Values , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[9]  Lukas Altwegg,et al.  Percutaneous Transarterial Aortic Valve Replacement in Selected High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis , 2007, Circulation.

[10]  S. Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Fabien Hyafil,et al.  Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Adriaan Moelker,et al.  Three dimensional evaluation of the aortic annulus using multislice computer tomography: are manufacturer's guidelines for sizing for percutaneous aortic valve replacement helpful? , 2010, European heart journal.

[13]  Thomas Walther,et al.  Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  F. Maisano,et al.  Incidence and Predictors of Early and Late Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in 663 Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis , 2011, Circulation.

[15]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1983 .

[16]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Doppler color flow mapping in the evaluation of prosthetic mitral and aortic valve function. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  P. Serruys,et al.  Assessment of the aortic annulus by multislice computed tomography, contrast aortography, and trans‐thoracic echocardiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation , 2011, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[18]  J. Chambers,et al.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[19]  Dudley J Pennell,et al.  Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.