Ranking university departments using the mean h-index

Ranking of universities has lately received considerable attention. However, ranking of departments would give a higher resolution picture of the distribution of quality within each university. In this work the Hirsch (h) index of each faculty in Greek Chemistry, Chemical Engineering, Materials Science, and Physics departments was calculated using the Web of Science and the mean value was used to rank them. This ranking refers to the research performance of each department and thus is most relevant to its doctoral program. The results seem highly meaningful. If performed on a pan-European basis, such rankings could spur healthy competition and could provide a strong motive for meritocratic hiring practices. Technical difficulties and possible extension of this approach to social science and humanities departments are discussed.

[1]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric meso-indicators. The case of european universities , 2006, Scientometrics.

[3]  Gualberto Buela-Casal,et al.  Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities , 2007, Scientometrics.

[4]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[5]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index , 2007 .

[6]  Juan Imperial,et al.  Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain , 2007, Scientometrics.

[7]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do we know about the h index? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  L. Egghe,et al.  Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[9]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Dynamic h-index: The Hirsch index in function of time , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Gad Saad,et al.  Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively , 2006, Scientometrics.

[11]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks , 2007, Scientometrics.

[12]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A Hirsch-type index for journals , 2006, Scientometrics.

[13]  L. Egghe.  How to improve the h-index , 2006 .

[14]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods , 2005, Scientometrics.

[16]  Michael G. Banks.  An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds , 2006, Scientometrics.

[17]  Jacqualine B. Grant,et al.  Academic Institutions in the United States and Canada Ranked According to Research Productivity in the Field of Conservation Biology , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[18]  G. Zachos,et al.  Research output evaluation of two University Departments in Greece with the use of bibliometric indicators , 1991, Scientometrics.