Is there Life after Subsidy for an Urban Consolidation Centre? An Investigation of the Total Costs and Benefits of a Privately-initiated Concept

The concept of an urban consolidation centre (UCC) has been extensively studied. Despite the potential positive environmental and social impact, the main obstacle remains the lack of a sustainable business model. Therefore UCCs are often heavily subsidised and tend to disappear as soon as the subsidies stop. This paper reports on a social cost-benefit analysis (SCBA) of an operational UCC in the Belgian city of Antwerp. The SCBA is based on real data and volumes. It concerns a private initiative that is not dependent upon subsidies and is located in an area with considerable problems (e.g., average delays of 28%). Results show that the consolidated deliveries are beneficial for society. Based on current volumes during the start-up period it is, however, not financially viable. The business volume lies considerably higher. This study shows that there is potential to reach a break-even turnover. Outcomes are linked to the transferability of the concept to other urban areas.

[1]  Frank Witlox,et al.  How to consolidate urban flows of goods without setting up an urban consolidation centre , 2012 .

[2]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  Localisation of freight consolidation centres serving small road hauliers in a wider urban area: barriers for more efficient freight deliveries in Gothenburg , 2014 .

[3]  L. Dablanc.  Goods transport in large European cities: Difficult to organize, difficult to modernize , 2007 .

[4]  Assessing the social relevance of school transport in Flanders (Belgium) , 2014 .

[5]  Niklas Arvidsson,et al.  The milk run revisited: A load factor paradox with economic and environmental implications for urban freight transport , 2013 .

[6]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport , 2004 .

[7]  G. Munda,et al.  Qualitative multicriteria evaluation for environmental management , 1994 .

[8]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  A stakeholder-based multicriteria evaluation framework for city distribution , 2014 .

[9]  Garth A. Gibson,et al.  Update of the handbook on external costs of transport: final report for the European Commission: DG-MOVE , 2014 .

[10]  A. J. Van Binsbergen,et al.  Innovation Steps Towards Efficient Goods Distribution Systems for Urban Areas , 2001 .

[11]  Hans Quak,et al.  Local impacts of a new urban consolidation centre – the case of Binnenstadservice.nl , 2010 .

[12]  Joeri Van Mierlo,et al.  A Range-Based Vehicle Life Cycle Assessment Incorporating Variability in the Environmental Assessment of Different Vehicle Technologies and Fuels , 2014 .

[13]  Romeo Danielis,et al.  The potential demand for a urban freight consolidation centre , 2008 .

[14]  E. Verhoef.  The implementation of marginal external cost pricing in road transport , 1998 .

[15]  Thomas H. Zunder,et al.  Urban freight logistics in the European Union , 2004 .

[16]  Jesús Muñuzuri,et al.  New challenges for urban consolidation centres: A case study in The Hague , 2010 .

[17]  L. Ryan,et al.  Comparative analysis of evaluation techniques for transport policies , 2011 .

[18]  Laetitia Dablanc,et al.  How can we Bring Logistics Back into Cities? The Case of Paris Metropolitan Area , 2012 .

[19]  Agostino Nuzzolo,et al.  Ex-ante assessment of urban freight transport policies , 2010 .

[20]  Milena Janjevic,et al.  Development and Application of a Transferability Framework for Micro-consolidation Schemes in Urban Freight Transport , 2013 .

[21]  Jacques Leonardi,et al.  Before-after assessment of a logistics trial with clean urban freight vehicles: a case study in London , 2012 .

[22]  Laetitia Dablanc.  City Distribution, a Key Element of the Urban Economy: Guidelines for Practitioners , 2011 .

[23]  Kenneth Lebeau,et al.  Electrifying light commercial vehicles for city logistics? A total cost of ownership analysis , 2015, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[24]  Julian Allen,et al.  University of Westminster Eprints , 2006 .

[25]  Luis Onieva,et al.  Solutions applicable by local administrations for urban logistics , 2005 .

[26]  Julian Allen,et al.  Urban freight consolidation centres: final report , 2005 .

[27]  Julian Allen,et al.  D 1.1 BESTUFS policy and research recommendations I: urban consolidation centres, last mile solutions , 2004 .

[28]  W. Ploos van Amstel,et al.  Lean and green: creating a network community for sustainable logistics , 2013 .

[29]  Leise Kelli de Oliveira,et al.  Economical and Environmental Analysis of an Urban Consolidation Center for Belo Horizonte City (Brazil) , 2012 .

[30]  Edoardo Marcucci,et al.  Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation , 2012 .

[31]  K. Sælensminde.  COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES OF WALKING AND CYCLING TRACK NETWORKS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT INSECURITY, HEALTH EFFECTS AND EXTERNAL COSTS OF MOTORIZED TRAFFIC , 2004 .

[32]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  Does a Mobile Depot Make Urban Deliveries Faster, More Sustainable and More Economically Viable: Results of a Pilot Test in Brussels , 2014 .

[33]  Maria Börjesson,et al.  Accuracy of congestion pricing forecasts , 2013 .

[34]  M. Browne,et al.  Light goods vehicles in urban areas , 2010 .

[35]  Jesús Muñuzuri,et al.  Revival of cost benefit analysis for evaluating the city distribution centre concept , 2008 .