On Modeling of Condensation-Induced Water Hammer in Horizontal Pipe

Condensation-induced water hammer, which appears when horizontal pipe filled with hot vapor is being slowly flooded with cold liquid, is known to be very stochastic phenomena. Time and position of the slug that is followed by the rapid condensation of the bubble behind the slug, is very sensitive to the minor changes in the experimental setup and consequently: results of the simulations are also very sensitive to the minor changes of the physical and numerical parameters in the model. Selected condensation-induced water hammer experiments performed on PMK-2 (AEKI, Hungary) device were numerically modeled with three-dimensional two-fluid model of computer codes NEPTUNE CFD. In most of the experimental cases, slow flooding of the pipe was abruptly interrupted by a strong slugging and water hammer, while in the experimental runs selected in the present work, the transition from the stratified into the slug flow was not accompanied by the water hammer pressure peak. That makes these cases more suitable tests for evaluation of the various condensation models in the horizontally stratified flows and puts them in the range of the available CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) codes. The key models for successful simulation appear to be the condensation model of the hot vapor on the cold liquid and the interfacial momentum transfer model. The surface renewal types of condensation correlations, developed for condensation in the stratified flows, were used in the simulations and were applied also in the regions of the slug flow. The CFD simulations quantitatively capture the main phenomena of the experiments, while the stochastic nature of the particular condensation-induced water hammer experiments does not allow detailed prediction of the time and position of the slug formation in the pipe. It is shown that even the selected experiments without water hammer present a tough test for the applied CFD codes.Copyright © 2009 by ASME

[1]  G. Tryggvason,et al.  A front-tracking method for viscous, incompressible, multi-fluid flows , 1992 .

[2]  Spiros V. Paras,et al.  CFD Code Application to Wavy Stratified Gas-Liquid Flow , 2001 .

[3]  E. D. Hughes,et al.  Direct contact condensation and momentum transfer in turbulent separated flows , 1991 .

[4]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Theoretical Prediction of Onset of Horizontal Slug Flow , 1980 .

[5]  George Yadigaroglu,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics for nuclear applications: from CFD to multi-scale CMFD , 2005 .

[6]  A. Dukler,et al.  A model for predicting flow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas‐liquid flow , 1976 .

[7]  S. Zaleski,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FREE-SURFACE AND INTERFACIAL FLOW , 1999 .

[8]  S. G. Bankoff,et al.  Heat transfer and interfacial drag in countercurrent steam-water stratified flow , 1985 .

[9]  Zhaohui Yao,et al.  Condensation-Induced Water-Hammer Analysis on the Steam Generator Accident Relief System , 1999 .

[10]  Andrej Prošek,et al.  Evaluating Code Uncertainty—I: Using the CSAU Method for Uncertainty Analysis of a Two-Loop PWR SBLOCA , 1999 .

[11]  M. C. Yuen,et al.  Condensation Measurement of Horizontal Cocurrent Steam/Water Flow , 1984 .

[12]  Masahiro Kawaji,et al.  Turbulence structure and prediction of interfacial heat and mass transfer in wavy‐stratified flow , 1997 .

[13]  Moon-Hyun Chun,et al.  A parametric study and a guide chart to avoid condensation-induced water hammer in a horizontal pipe , 2000 .

[14]  Izuo Aya,et al.  Evaluation of heat-transfer coefficient at direct-contact condensation of cold water and steam , 1991 .

[15]  J. Sethian,et al.  LEVEL SET METHODS FOR FLUID INTERFACES , 2003 .

[16]  M. Boucker,et al.  A Two-Phase CFD Approach to the PTS Problem Evaluated on COSI Experiment , 2008 .

[17]  D. Bestion,et al.  The physical closure laws in the CATHARE code , 1990 .

[18]  Djamel Lakehal,et al.  Surface divergence models for scalar exchange between turbulent streams , 2004 .