L1 and L2 Acquisition of Dutch Adjectival Inflection

In this paper results are presented from experiments involving L1 acquisition as well as child and adult L2 acquisition of Dutch adjectival inflection. First of all these results support a morphological theory of the inflectional system in which forms that are similar at the surface (namely, bare adjectives) receive a rather different analysis. In addition the results suggest that acquisition of inflection is age dependent. While children acquire the inflectional system very easily, this is not the case for adults. It is shown that L1 and child L2 learners make errors in a similar direction and show a rather homogenous development, while adult L2 learners behave rather differently in these respects. The parallel between the L1 learners and the child L2 learners does not imply, however, that they reach the same end state. This is also interpreted as an effect of age dependency. It is argued that the results are in line with a commonly held assumption on language contact, namely that different forms of L2 acquisition may eventually corrupt the inflectional system and may lead to deflection.

[1]  L. Menn,et al.  Phonological development : models, research, implications , 1994 .

[2]  W.J.M. Haeseryn.  Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst , 1997 .

[3]  Jan Nijen Twilhaar.  Generatieve fonologie en de studie van Oostnederlandse dialecten = Generative phonology and the study of Eastern Dutch dialects , 1990 .

[4]  F. V. Coetsem.  Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact , 1988 .

[5]  Jaap van Marle.  On the fate of adjectival declension in Overseas Dutch (with some notes on the history of Dutch) , 1995 .

[6]  Johan Taeldeman,et al.  Inflectional Aspects of Adjectives in the Dialects of Dutch-Speaking Belgium , 1980 .

[7]  Donna Lardiere.  Case and Tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state , 1998 .

[8]  Jürgen M. Meisel.  Revisiting Universal Grammar , 2000 .

[9]  Martin Pütz,et al.  Wheels within wheels : papers of the Duisburg Symposium on Pidgin and Creole languages , 1989 .

[10]  K. Wexler.  Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage , 1998 .

[11]  G. de Schutter.  Jan Nijen Twilhaar: Generatieve fonologie en de studie van Oostnederlandse dialecten , 1993 .

[12]  Donna Lardiere,et al.  Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar , 1998 .

[13]  P. M. Kester,et al.  The Nature of Adjectival Inflection , 1996 .

[14]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[15]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  On the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of , 2004 .

[16]  H. R. Harvey,et al.  Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics , 1990 .

[17]  Mieke Trommelen,et al.  Inleiding in de generatieve fonologie. , 1979 .

[18]  A. Blom.  het ondoorgrondelijk bijvoeglijk naamwoord , 1994 .

[19]  H. V. D. Voort,et al.  Die Creol Taal: 250 Years of Negerhollands Texts , 1996 .

[20]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[21]  John Archibald,et al.  Second language acquisition and linguistic theory , 2000 .

[22]  Sjef Barbiers,et al.  Adjectieven voor taalkundigen H. Broekhuis, Adjectives and Adjective Phrases. Modern Grammar of Dutch Occasional Papers 2. , 2001 .

[23]  Jay H. Jasanoff.  Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics , 1988 .

[24]  B. MacWhinney.  The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[25]  Christa de Kleine.  A morphosyntactic analysis of Surinamese Dutch as spoken by the Creole population of Paramaribo, Suriname , 2007 .

[26]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  The acquisition of syntax : studies in comparative developmental linguistics , 2000 .