Limited movement in blue rockfish Sebastes mystinus: internal structure of home range

Home range has been estimated for a limited number of marine fishes; however, the use of space and timing of activities within the home range has rarely been studied. In addition, under- standing movement patterns of exploited fish species has been identified as a crucial science gap, impeding informed marine reserve design. We used a radio-acoustic positioning telemetry (VRAP) system to monitor detailed movements of 10 blue rockfish Sebastes mystinus around shallow rock pinnacles and stands of bull kelp Nereocystis leutkeana in central California in September 2002. The mean home range was 8783 m 2 ± 1137 SE; however, activity was highly concentrated in 1 to 3 core areas within each home range. Mean core areas measured 1350 m 2 ± 286 SE, but accounted for ~83% of activity. All core areas were centered over rock pinnacles where rockfish were highly aggregated. Individuals exhibited high site fidelity and made only brief radial excursions away from these centers or moved directly from one pinnacle to the next along defined corridors. Patterns of diel activity and nocturnal sheltering corresponded closely with nautical twilight. Cores overlapped, but estimated locations of nocturnal shelters differed significantly among individuals. Movement patterns were cor- related with wind velocity, upwelling index, water temperature and habitat structure.

[1]  Michael D. Samuel,et al.  A Revised Test Procedure for Identifying Core Areas Within the Home Range , 1988 .

[2]  Christopher G. Lowe,et al.  Movements and dispersal patterns of blue trevally (Caranx melampygus) in a fisheries conservation zone , 1996 .

[3]  Christopher G. Lowe,et al.  Movement Patterns, Habitat Utilization, Home Range Size and Site Fidelity of Whitesaddle Goatfish, Parupeneus Porphyreus, In a Marine Reserve , 2000, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[4]  U. Send,et al.  Relaxation from upwelling in the Coastal Ocean Dynamics Experiment , 1987 .

[5]  S. Gaines,et al.  Fish in Offshore Kelp Forests Affect Recruitment to Intertidal Barnacle Populations , 1987, Science.

[6]  S. V. Van Sommeran,et al.  Radio-acoustic positioning as a tool for studying site-specific behavior of the white shark and other large marine species , 2001 .

[7]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Starling Roost Dispersal and a Hypothetical Mechanism Regulating Rhthmical Animal Movement to and from Dispersal Centers. , 1967, Ecology.

[8]  R. Steneck,et al.  Critical science gaps impede use of no-take fishery reserves. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  Daniel J. Miller,et al.  Fish Bulletin 158. Summary of Blue Rockfish and Lingcod Life Histories; A Reef Ecology Study; And Giant Kelp, Macrocystis Pyrifera, Experiments In Monterey Bay, California , 1973 .

[10]  W. Large,et al.  Open Ocean Momentum Flux Measurements in Moderate to Strong Winds , 1981 .

[11]  E. Hobson,et al.  TROPHIC RELATIONS OF THE BLUE ROCKFISH, SEBASTES MYSTINUS, IN A COASTAL UPWELLING SYSTEM OFF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA , 1988 .

[12]  C. Lowe,et al.  Movements and Distribution of Hammerhead Shark Pups on Their Natal Grounds , 1993 .

[13]  Don W. Hayne,et al.  Calculation of Size of Home Range , 1949 .

[14]  H. Dingle,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of movement , 2001 .

[15]  Christopher G. Lowe,et al.  Home range and habitat utilization of adult California sheephead, Semicossyphus pulcher (Labridae), in a temperate no-take marine reserve , 2005 .

[16]  T. Quinn,et al.  Migration in Coral Reef Fishes: Ecological Significance and Orientation Mechanisms , 1984 .

[17]  Eugene P. Odum,et al.  Measurement of territory and home range size in birds , 1955 .

[18]  L. Botsford,et al.  Settlement and transport of benthic invertebrates in an intermittent upwelling region , 1995 .

[19]  D. J. Anderson,et al.  The Home Range: A New Nonparametric Estimation Technique , 1982 .

[20]  K. Matthews An experimental study of the habitat preferences and movement patterns of copper, quillback, and brown rockfishes (Sebastes spp.) , 1990, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[21]  Donald L. Kramer,et al.  Implications of fish home range size and relocation for marine reserve function , 1999, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[22]  B. Worton Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[23]  H. Oxenford,et al.  Home range size and use of space by Bermuda chub Kyphosus sectatrix (L.) in two marine reserves in the Soufrière Marine Management Area, St Lucia, West Indies , 2001 .

[24]  R. Lawson,et al.  COLOR‐PATTERN VARIATION IN LAKE ERIE WATER SNAKES: THE ROLE OF GENE FLOW , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  R. Bray INFLUENCE OF WATER CURRENTS AND ZOOPLANKTON DENSITIES ON DAILY FORAGING MOVEMENTS OF BLACKSMITH, CHROMIS PUNCTIPINNIS, A PLANKTIVOROUS REEF FISH , 1981 .

[26]  Wing,et al.  Spatial structure of relaxation events and crab settlement in the northern California upwelling system , 1995 .

[27]  M. Hixon,et al.  Synergistic predation, density dependence, and population regulation in marine fish , 1997 .

[28]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Seasonal cycles of currents, temperatures, winds, and sea level over the northeast pacific continental shelf: 35°N to 48°N , 1987 .

[29]  Alan P. Covich,et al.  Analyzing Shapes of Foraging Areas: Some Ecological and Economic Theories , 1976 .

[30]  B. J. Worton,et al.  A review of models of home range for animal movement , 1987 .

[31]  A. Klimley,et al.  Diel movement patterns of the scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini) in relation to El Bajo Espiritu Santo: a refuging central-position social system , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  Michael D. Samuel,et al.  Identifying areas of concentrated use within the home range , 1985 .

[33]  C. M. Paulsen,et al.  Assessing covariability among populations in the presence of intraseries correlation: Columbia river spring-summer chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) stocks , 2000 .

[34]  A. Hastings,et al.  The Effects of Small Dispersal Rates on Extinction Times in Structured Metapopulation Models , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[35]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  EFFECTS OF SUCCESSIONAL DYNAMICS ON METAPOPULATION PERSISTENCE , 2003 .

[36]  M. Love,et al.  The Rockfishes of the Northeast Pacific , 2002 .

[37]  D. A. Roberts,et al.  Differential utilization of space and food by the inshore rockfishes (Scorpaenidae: Sebastes) of Carmel Bay, California , 1985, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[38]  Kathy H. Hodder,et al.  DENSITY AND LINKAGE ESTIMATORS OF HOME RANGE: NEAREST‐NEIGHBOR CLUSTERING DEFINES MULTINUCLEAR CORES , 2001 .

[39]  Robin K. S. Hankin,et al.  Snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) home range dynamics : acoustic tagging studies in a marine reserve , 2003 .

[40]  Christopher G. Lowe,et al.  Movement patterns, home range, and habitat utilization of adult kelp bass Paralabrax clathratus in a temperate no-take marine reserve , 2003 .

[41]  I. Hanski Metapopulation dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[42]  J. Ginsberg,et al.  Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas , 1998, Science.