Identifying Stride-To-Stride Control Strategies in Human Treadmill Walking

Variability is ubiquitous in human movement, arising from internal and external noise, inherent biological redundancy, and from the neurophysiological control actions that help regulate movement fluctuations. Increased walking variability can lead to increased energetic cost and/or increased fall risk. Conversely, biological noise may be beneficial, even necessary, to enhance motor performance. Indeed, encouraging more variability actually facilitates greater improvements in some forms of locomotor rehabilitation. Thus, it is critical to identify the fundamental principles humans use to regulate stride-to-stride fluctuations in walking. This study sought to determine how humans regulate stride-to-stride fluctuations in stepping movements during treadmill walking. We developed computational models based on pre-defined goal functions to compare if subjects, from each stride to the next, tried to maintain the same speed as the treadmill, or instead stay in the same position on the treadmill. Both strategies predicted average behaviors empirically indistinguishable from each other and from that of humans. These strategies, however, predicted very different stride-to-stride fluctuation dynamics. Comparisons to experimental data showed that human stepping movements were generally well-predicted by the speed-control model, but not by the position-control model. Human subjects also exhibited no indications they corrected deviations in absolute position only intermittently: i.e., closer to the boundaries of the treadmill. Thus, humans clearly do not adopt a control strategy whose primary goal is to maintain some constant absolute position on the treadmill. Instead, humans appear to regulate their stepping movements in a way most consistent with a strategy whose primary goal is to try to maintain the same speed as the treadmill at each consecutive stride. These findings have important implications both for understanding how biological systems regulate walking in general and for being able to harness these mechanisms to develop more effective rehabilitation interventions to improve locomotor performance.

[1]  A. Patla,et al.  “Look where you’re going!”: gaze behaviour associated with maintaining and changing the direction of locomotion , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Separating the effects of age and walking speed on gait variability. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[3]  Katie Byl,et al.  Metastable Walking Machines , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  S. Collins,et al.  Two Independent Contributions to Step Variability during Over-Ground Human Walking , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  Robert Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  D A Winter,et al.  Treadmill versus walkway locomotion in humans: an EMG study. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[7]  A. Ruina,et al.  Multiple walking speed-frequency relations are predicted by constrained optimization. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  Yoshiaki Shirai,et al.  Look where you're going [robotic wheelchair] , 2003, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[9]  D. Sternad,et al.  Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Is walking a random walk? Evidence for long-range correlations in stride interval of human gait. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  H J Yack,et al.  Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill walking. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Re-interpreting detrended fluctuation analyses of stride-to-stride variability in human walking. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[13]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  How to keep from falling forward: elementary swing leg action for passive dynamic walkers , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  Wendy D. Zosh,et al.  Optic Flow Drives Human Visuo-Locomotor Adaptation , 2007, Current Biology.

[15]  Karen E. Adolph,et al.  Visually guided navigation: Head-mounted eye-tracking of natural locomotion in children and adults , 2010, Vision Research.

[16]  B. Day,et al.  Control of frontal plane body motion in human stepping , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Sascha E. Engelbrecht,et al.  Minimum Principles in Motor Control. , 2001, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[18]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  A Pilot Study on the Feasibility of Robot-Aided Leg Motor Training to Facilitate Active Participation , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Nonlinear time series analysis of normal and pathological human walking. , 2000, Chaos.

[21]  M. Brainard,et al.  Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of ‘crystallized’ adult birdsong , 2007, Nature.

[22]  Jonathan B Dingwell,et al.  Trial-to-trial dynamics and learning in a generalized, redundant reaching task. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Jonathan B Dingwell,et al.  Movement variability near goal equivalent manifolds: fluctuations, control, and model-based analysis. , 2013, Human movement science.

[24]  U. Croce,et al.  A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[25]  A. E. Patla,et al.  Online steering: coordination and control of body center of mass, head and body reorientation , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Altered fractal dynamics of gait: reduced stride-interval correlations with aging and Huntington's disease. , 1997, Journal of applied physiology.

[27]  Christine Detrembleur,et al.  Does human gait exhibit comparable and reproducible long-range autocorrelations on level ground and on treadmill? , 2010, Gait & posture.

[28]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Dynamic stability of passive dynamic walking on an irregular surface. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[29]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Multiple-step strategies to recover from stumbling perturbations. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[30]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Stepping in the direction of the fall: the next foot placement can be predicted from current upper body state in steady-state walking , 2014, Biology Letters.

[31]  J. Timmer,et al.  Tempting long-memory - on the interpretation of DFA results , 2004 .

[32]  B. Fajen,et al.  Humans exploit the biomechanics of bipedal gait during visually guided walking over complex terrain , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Jonathan B. Dingwell,et al.  Do Humans Optimally Exploit Redundancy to Control Step Variability in Walking? , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Visual control of foot placement when walking over complex terrain , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  J. Sethna Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order Parameters, and Complexity , 2021 .

[36]  Twan Koolen,et al.  Capturability-based analysis and control of legged locomotion, Part 1: Theory and application to three simple gait models , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[37]  Phillipp Kaestner,et al.  Linear And Nonlinear Programming , 2016 .

[38]  Matthias D. Ziegler,et al.  Why Variability Facilitates Spinal Learning , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Effects of walking speed, strength and range of motion on gait stability in healthy older adults. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  R. McGhee,et al.  On the dynamic stability of biped locomotion. , 1974, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[41]  P. Terrier,et al.  Persistent and anti-persistent pattern in stride-to-stride variability of treadmill walking: influence of rhythmic auditory cueing. , 2012, Human movement science.

[42]  Jonathan B Dingwell,et al.  Kinematic strategies for walking across a destabilizing rock surface. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[43]  G. J. van Ingen Schenau,et al.  Some fundamental aspects of the biomechanics of overground versus treadmill locomotion. , 1980, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[44]  R. Lipton,et al.  Quantitative gait markers and incident fall risk in older adults. , 2009, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[45]  Joan N. Vickers,et al.  How far ahead do we look when required to step on specific locations in the travel path during locomotion? , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  Jonathan B Dingwell,et al.  Influence of simulated neuromuscular noise on the dynamic stability and fall risk of a 3D dynamic walking model. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  R. J. Beers,et al.  Motor Learning Is Optimally Tuned to the Properties of Motor Noise , 2009, Neuron.

[48]  William H. Warren,et al.  Optic flow is used to control human walking , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  Florentin Wörgötter,et al.  Correction: Adaptive, Fast Walking in a Biped Robot under Neuronal Control and Learning , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[50]  Mark D. McDonnell,et al.  The benefits of noise in neural systems: bridging theory and experiment , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  M A Townsend,et al.  Biped gait stabilization via foot placement. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[52]  A. Kuo A simple model of bipedal walking predicts the preferred speed-step length relationship. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[53]  Jaap H van Dieën,et al.  Local dynamic stability and variability of gait are associated with fall history in elderly subjects. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[54]  Michael Greig,et al.  Any way you look at it, successful obstacle negotiation needs visually guided on-line foot placement regulation during the approach phase , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[55]  Zrinka Potocanac,et al.  Fast online corrections of tripping responses , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  Aftab E Patla,et al.  Validating determinants for an alternate foot placement selection algorithm during human locomotion in cluttered terrain. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  Noah J Rosenblatt,et al.  The discriminant capabilities of stability measures, trunk kinematics, and step kinematics in classifying successful and failed compensatory stepping responses by young adults. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[58]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Neuronal variability: noise or part of the signal? , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[59]  S. Scott Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[60]  M. Lewek,et al.  Allowing Intralimb Kinematic Variability During Locomotor Training Poststroke Improves Kinematic Consistency: A Subgroup Analysis From a Randomized Clinical Trial , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[61]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Dynamic stability of human walking in visually and mechanically destabilizing environments. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[62]  W. Bialek,et al.  A sensory source for motor variation , 2005, Nature.

[63]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[64]  Francisco J. Valero Cuevas,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis reveals active control of both task-relevant and task-irrelevant variables , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[65]  D. Marigold Role of Peripheral Visual Cues in Online Visual Guidance of Locomotion , 2008, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[66]  R J Full,et al.  Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[67]  A. E. Patla,et al.  Gaze fixation patterns for negotiating complex ground terrain , 2007, Neuroscience.

[68]  C. Peng,et al.  Long-range correlations in nucleotide sequences , 1992, Nature.

[69]  P. Beek,et al.  Assessing the stability of human locomotion: a review of current measures , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[70]  M. Golubitsky,et al.  Symmetry in locomotor central pattern generators and animal gaits , 1999, Nature.

[71]  Manoj Srinivasan,et al.  Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking and running , 2006, Nature.

[72]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Dynamic sensorimotor interactions in locomotion. , 2006, Physiological reviews.

[73]  P. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[74]  Arthur D. Kuo,et al.  Stabilization of Lateral Motion in Passive Dynamic Walking , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[75]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[76]  Natasha Loder,et al.  Journal under attack over controversial paper on GM food , 1999, Nature.

[77]  M. Pandy,et al.  Dynamic optimization of human walking. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[78]  R J Full,et al.  How animals move: an integrative view. , 2000, Science.

[79]  P. J. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[80]  Brian L. Day,et al.  Predictive control of body mass trajectory in a two-step sequence , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[81]  Noah J Rosenblatt,et al.  Measures of frontal plane stability during treadmill and overground walking. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[82]  Raymond F Reynolds,et al.  Visual guidance of the human foot during a step , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[83]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning , 1998, Nature.

[84]  P. Terrier,et al.  GPS analysis of human locomotion: further evidence for long-range correlations in stride-to-stride fluctuations of gait parameters. , 2005, Human movement science.

[85]  Cécile Smeesters,et al.  Instructions limiting the number of steps do not affect the kinetics of the threshold of balance recovery in younger adults. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[86]  Paola Cesari,et al.  Body-goal Variability Mapping in an Aiming Task , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[87]  Twan Koolen,et al.  Capturability-based analysis and control of legged locomotion, Part 2: Application to M2V2, a lower-body humanoid , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[88]  R. Dolan,et al.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[89]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Random walk of motor planning in task-irrelevant dimensions. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[90]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Kinematic variability and local dynamic stability of upper body motions when walking at different speeds. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[91]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots: A review , 2008, Neural Networks.

[92]  L. Pinneo On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.

[93]  M S Redfern,et al.  A model of foot placement during gait. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[94]  A. Kuo,et al.  Energetic cost of walking with increased step variability. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[95]  M. Bonnard,et al.  Steady-state fluctuations of human walking , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.