Comparative characterization methods for metal oxide nanoparticles in aqueous suspensions

Characterization of nanoscale materials is an essential component of research to inform product development as well as industrial and public health policies; however, few studies have investigated currently available competing and complimentary analytical techniques for characterization of nanoparticles in suspensions. The goal of this study was to compare multiple characterization methods and resulting data for aqueous nanoparticle suspensions used in semiconductor manufacturing. It was determined that the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS) provides the most reliable sizing and particle counting data, while other methods are offer less precision, accuracy, or are more resource-intensive. For determining concentration, standard methods like ICP-OES and ICP-MS are very effective. At present, there is no single tool that can provide comprehensive characterization data for aqueous nanoparticle suspensions, and therefore a combined approach is necessary. It was also found that information presented on Safety Data Sheets for nanomaterials may differ from that captured through analysis of the corresponding product, further highlighting the need for a comparison of characterization methods. Future studies aiming to characterize nanomaterials in the environmental or other aqueous matrices will be benefit from the development of combined techniques or novel characterization tools.

[1]  Kevin Robbie,et al.  Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity , 2007, Biointerphases.

[2]  S. Doak,et al.  NanoGenotoxicology: the DNA damaging potential of engineered nanomaterials. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[3]  M Laird Forrest,et al.  Effects of nanomaterial physicochemical properties on in vivo toxicity. , 2009, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[4]  M. He,et al.  Dithizone modified magnetic nanoparticles for fast and selective solid phase extraction of trace elements in environmental and biological samples prior to their determination by ICP-OES. , 2012, Talanta.

[5]  Xiangyu Bi,et al.  Nanoparticle size detection limits by single particle ICP-MS for 40 elements. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  S. Brenner,et al.  SEM analysis of particle size during conventional treatment of CMP process wastewater. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  N. Jacobsen,et al.  Role of oxidative damage in toxicity of particulates , 2010, Free radical research.

[8]  Vicki H. Grassian,et al.  When Size Really Matters: Size-Dependent Properties and Surface Chemistry of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in Gas and Liquid Phase Environments† , 2008 .

[9]  W. Stach,et al.  ICP-MS: a powerful technique for quantitative determination of gold nanoparticles without previous dissolving , 2009 .

[10]  Chang Ming Li,et al.  Probing cytotoxicity of nanoparticles and organic compounds using scanning proton microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy , 2008 .

[11]  Y. Zhai,et al.  Determination of trace metals in natural samples by ICP-OES after preconcentration on modified silica gel and on modified silica nanoparticles , 2009 .

[12]  Paul G Tratnyek,et al.  Characterization challenges for nanomaterials , 2008 .

[13]  Denise M Mitrano,et al.  Detecting nanoparticulate silver using single‐particle inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[14]  Pawel L Urban,et al.  Nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management. , 2009, Waste management.

[15]  G. Hieftje,et al.  Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and electrospray mass spectrometry for speciation analysis: applications and instrumentation , 2004 .

[16]  James F. Ranville,et al.  Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[17]  Lev Dykman,et al.  Biodistribution and toxicity of engineered gold nanoparticles: a review of in vitro and in vivo studies. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[18]  Christopher J. Hogan,et al.  Colloidal nanoparticle analysis by nanoelectrospray size spectrometry with a heated flow. , 2007, Analytica chimica acta.

[19]  H. Weinberg,et al.  Evaluating engineered nanoparticles in natural waters , 2011 .

[20]  Dirk Tiede,et al.  Application of hydrodynamic chromatography-ICP-MS to investigate the fate of silver nanoparticles in activated sludge , 2010 .

[21]  A. Boxall,et al.  Detection and characterization of engineered nanoparticles in food and the environment , 2008, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[22]  Paul E. West,et al.  A comparison of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) methods to characterize nanoparticle size distributions , 2008 .

[23]  Sabine Plitzko,et al.  Workplace exposure to engineered nanoparticles , 2009, Inhalation toxicology.

[24]  Clinton F Jones,et al.  In vitro assessments of nanomaterial toxicity. , 2009, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[25]  A. Rogach,et al.  Evolution of an Ensemble of Nanoparticles in a Colloidal Solution: Theoretical Study , 2001 .

[26]  Bernd Giebel,et al.  Characterisation of exosomes derived from human cells by nanoparticle tracking analysis and scanning electron microscopy. , 2011, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[27]  Matthias Ochs,et al.  A review of recent methods for efficiently quantifying immunogold and other nanoparticles using TEM sections through cells, tissues and organs. , 2009, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[28]  M. Epple,et al.  Possibilities and limitations of different analytical methods for the size determination of a bimodal dispersion of metallic nanoparticles , 2011 .