Influences of formant bandwidth and auditory frequency selectivity on identification of place of articulation in stop consonants

Abstract Can supra-normal spectral contrast in an acoustical speech signal compensate for the degraded frequency selectivity accompanying hearing losses of cochlear origin? To answer this question, two sets of stimuli were synthesized: whispered exemplars of “bet”, “debt”, “get” (the initial set) and “bib”, “bid”, “big” (the final set). Spectral contrast was increased by narrowing the bandwidths of the first five formants; contrast was reduced by broadening their bandwidths. Subjects were adults either with audiometrically-normal hearing or with moderate hearing impairments of cochlear origin. For both groups of listeners, accuracy of identification decreased as formant bandwidth increased. In the mean data of both groups for syllable-final identification, there was a tendency for accuracy to increase when format bandwidths were set to half their nominally normal values. Psychoacoustical measures of frequency selectivity correlated robustly with accuracy of identification, but again only for final consonants. These results suggest that factors in addition to reduced frequency resolution and reduced absolute sensitivity set limits on the accuracy of speech identification in cases of cochlear hearing loss, particularly for syllable-initial consonants. Possible candidates, not explored here, are reduced temporal resolution and an increased susceptibility to backward masking. The very limited benefits for speech identification which resulted from reducing formant-bandwidths may reflect the inability of that transformation to compensate for impairments to temporal auditory processing, as well as for extreme impairments to frequency resolution.

[1]  Quentin Summerfield,et al.  Enhancing spectral contrast in the auditory representation of speech , 1984 .

[2]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  I V Nábĕlek Performance of hearing-impaired listeners under various types of amplitude compression. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  C M Reed,et al.  Discrimination of speech processed by low-pass filtering and pitch-invariant frequency lowering. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  P. Fitzgibbons,et al.  Temporal gap detection in noise as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .

[8]  P. Fitzgibbons,et al.  Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  G F Pick,et al.  Level dependence of psychophysical frequency resolution and auditory filter shape. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Constraints Imposed by the Auditory System on the Properties Used to Classify Speech Sounds: Data from Phonology, Acoustics, and Psychoacoustics , 1981 .

[11]  Lois L. Elliott,et al.  Temporal processing in noise by persons with noise‐induced and age‐related hearing loss , 1975 .

[12]  Evans Ef Peripheral auditory processing in normal and abnormal ears: physiological considerations for attempts to compensate for auditory deficits by acoustic and electrical prostheses. , 1978 .

[13]  K. Stevens,et al.  Estimation of formant band widths from measurements of transient response of the vocal tract. , 1958, Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders.

[14]  J. R. Trinder,et al.  Hardware-software configuration for high performance digital filtering in real-time , 1982, ICASSP.

[15]  Peter J. Bailey Hearing for Speech: the Information Transmitted in Normal and Impaired Hearing , 1983 .

[16]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  M. E. Lutman,et al.  Hearing science and hearing disorders , 1983 .

[18]  M F Dorman,et al.  Identification of synthetic /bdg/ by hearing-impaired listeners under monotic and dichotic formant presentation. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M Fernandes,et al.  Frequency resolution and discrimination of constant and dynamic tones in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  W Melnick,et al.  American National Standard specifications for audiometers. , 1971, ASHA.

[21]  M F Dorman,et al.  Susceptibility to intraspeech spread of masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Mark Haggard,et al.  Temporal Patterning in Speech: The Implications of Temporal Resolution and Signal-Processing , 1985 .

[23]  P. M. Boers Formant enhancement of speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss , 1980 .

[24]  J M Festen,et al.  Relations between auditory functions in normal hearing. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Jae S. Lim,et al.  Speech enhancement , 1986, ICASSP '86. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[26]  J. Seton,et al.  Fricative Envelope Parameters and Silent Intervals in Distinguishing ‘slit’ and ‘split’ , 1981 .

[27]  J M Festen,et al.  Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  B C Moore,et al.  Gap detection as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  R. Plomp Rate of Decay of Auditory Sensation , 1964 .

[30]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Perception of static and dynamic acoustic cues to place of articulation in initial stop consonants. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  M F Dorman,et al.  Shifts in phonetic identification with changes in signal presentation level. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. , 1983, British journal of audiology.

[33]  J. M. Pickett,et al.  Some Masking Effects Produced by Low-Frequency Vowel Formants in Persons with Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 1975 .