Clinical evaluation of 3.0-mm narrow-diameter implants: a retrospective study with up to 5 years of observation.

PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a single type of narrow-diameter implant (NDI) by investigating its survival rate and peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL). In addition, variables possibly related to implant survival and MBL were investigated to identify potential risk factors. METHODS The study was conducted as a retrospective study involving 49 patients who had received 3.0-mm diameter TSIII implants (Osstem Implant Co.) at Seoul National University Dental Hospital. In total, 64 implants were included, and dental records and radiographic data were collected from 2017 to 2022. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and a Cox proportional hazard model were used to estimate the implant survival rate and to investigate the effects of age, sex, jaw, implant location, implant length, the stage of surgery, guided bone regeneration, type of implant placement, and the surgeon's proficiency (resident or professor) on implant survival. The MBL of the NDIs was measured, and the factors influencing MBL were evaluated. RESULTS The mean observation period was 30.5 months (interquartile range, 26.75-45 months), and 6 out of 64 implants failed. The survival rate of the NDIs was 90.6%, and the multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age was associated with implant failure (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.31, P=0.01). The mean MBL was 0.44±0.75 mm, and no factors showed statistically significant associations with greater MBL. CONCLUSIONS NDIs can be considered a primary alternative when standard-diameter implants are unsuitable. However, further studies are required to confirm their long-term stability.

[1]  Young-Taek Kim,et al.  Evaluation of failed implants and reimplantation at sites of previous dental implant failure: survival rates and risk factors , 2021, Journal of periodontal & implant science.

[2]  C. Lemos,et al.  Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  Young-Kyun Kim,et al.  The long-term evaluation of the prognosis of implants with acid-etched surfaces sandblasted with alumina: a retrospective clinical study , 2020, Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  Myeongjin Kim,et al.  Early implant failure: a retrospective analysis of contributing factors , 2019, Journal of periodontal & implant science.

[5]  B. Al-Nawas,et al.  Narrow‐diameter implants: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2018, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  Osvaldo D Moráguez,et al.  Four‐unit fixed dental prostheses replacing the maxillary incisors supported by two narrow‐diameter implants – a five‐year case series , 2017, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  F. Müller,et al.  Implants for elderly patients , 2017, Periodontology 2000.

[8]  Byoung-Eun Yang,et al.  Narrow-diameter implants with conical connection for restoring the posterior edentulous region , 2016, Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of narrow- vs. regular-diameter dental implants: a 3-year follow-up. A retrospective study. , 2015, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  Seong-Ho Choi,et al.  Long-term retrospective study of narrow implants for fixed dental prostheses. , 2013, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  Jin-Woo Park,et al.  Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on periimplant marginal bone loss in the posterior region: a five-year retrospective study , 2012, Journal of periodontal & implant science.

[12]  K. Baroudi,et al.  Factors associated with early and late failure of dental implants. , 2012, Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry.

[13]  P. Kämmerer,et al.  Retrospective analysis of survival rates and marginal bone loss on short implants in the mandible. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  K. Guze,et al.  Factors associated with dental implant survival: a 4-year retrospective analysis , 2011, BDJ.

[15]  M. Chiapasco,et al.  Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  M. Chiapasco,et al.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of small-diameter (3.3-mm) implants followed for 1-7 years: a longitudinal study. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  L. Levin,et al.  The Effect of Cigarette Smoking on Dental Implants and Related Surgery , 2005, Implant dentistry.

[18]  James Laney Williams,et al.  Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  D Buser,et al.  Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. , 1990, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  Fenglei Xu,et al.  Long‐term outcomes of narrow diameter implants in posterior jaws: A retrospective study with at least 8‐year follow‐up , 2018, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  B. Al-Nawas,et al.  Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants. , 2014, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[22]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. , 2014, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[23]  P. Nilsson,et al.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow diameter implants - 1-year follow-up. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[24]  F. Carinci,et al.  Clinical Outcome of Narrow Diameter Implants: A Retrospective Study of 510 Implants , 2008 .

[25]  T. Griffin,et al.  Why do dental implants fail? Part I. , 1999, Implant dentistry.

[26]  T. Griffin,et al.  Why do dental implants fail? Part II. , 1999, Implant dentistry.