Resistance to Water Transfer in Desert Shrubs Native to Death Valley, California

Differences in plant resistance to water flow, patterns of water transport through stems, and stomatal behavior were studied on three species native to the exceptionally hot and dry habitat of Death Valley, California (—, and Larrea divaricata). Dawn xylem water potentials in July for Atriplex were — 27.5 bar under natural conditions. Corresponding values for Tidestromia and Larrea were respectively — 8.0 bar and -32.0 bar (natural) and — 7.5 bar and — 18.0 bar (irrigated). Recovery of xylem water potential in covered field plants of an irrigated transplant garden reached a maximum value in July of — 9.5 bar in Atriplex, — 5.7 bar in Tidestromia and — 7.0 bar in Larrea. Resistance to free-energy transfer was used to study resistance to water transport through the plants. Under field conditions irrigated Atriplex plants gave a whole plant resistance of 20.70 × 106 s cm-1, as compared lo 18.37 × 106 s cm-1 for Larrea and 10.01 × 106 s cm-1 for Tidestromia. Plant resistance to water How computed by this method on Atriplex plants grown under laboratory conditions gave a value of 3.73 × 106 s cm-1 at 35C. Paths of water flow in field plants as investigated with injected acid fuchsin indicated a sectorial straight type vessel. The relationship between transpiration rates and xylem water potentials in Atriplex hymenelytra was linear between transpiration 1.28 μg cm-2 s-1 and 2.35 μg cm-2 s-1 at 35°C. These results indicate that according to the Van den Honert model for water transport, plant resistance to water flow remained rather constant at this temperature. In Atriplex grown under laboratory conditions there was an adjustment of plant resistance so change in water flux at 9.5°C and 25°C. When laboratory-grown plants of Atriplex and Tidestromia were subjected to water stress by withholding water. Tidestromia closed stomata and reduced transpiration rates at higher water potentials than in Atriplex. The ratio of vapor pressure gradients of leaf/air to leaf diffusion resistance was proportional lo transpiration rates. It is suggested that Atriplex hymenelytra is a species that combines strong regulation of water loss by stomata with low efficiency of the water transport system. These plants are unable to prevent depression of plant water potential as transpiration increases. On the other hand. Tidestromia oblongifolia has little stomatal regulation of transpiration and a highly efficient water transport system. These plants sustain very high rates of transpiration without significant decrease in plant water potential.

[1]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Environmental Effects on Transpiration and Leaf Water Potential in Avocado , 1977 .

[2]  E. Fiscus Determination of hydraulic and osmotic properties of soybean root systems. , 1977, Plant physiology.

[3]  E. Fiscus Effects of Coupled Solute and Water Flow in Plant Roots with Special Reference to Brouwer's Experiment , 1977 .

[4]  J. Landsberg,et al.  Studies on the Movement of Water Through Apple Trees , 1976 .

[5]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Leaf water stress in engelmann spruce: influence of the root and shoot environments. , 1975, Plant physiology.

[6]  M. R. Thorpe,et al.  Diurnal Energy, Water and CO 2 Exchanges in an Apple (Malus pumila) Orchard , 1975 .

[7]  P J Kramer,et al.  General model for osmotic and pressure-induced flow in plant roots. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  W. R. Gardner,et al.  Simultaneous Uptake of Water and Solutes by Plant Roots1 , 1975 .

[9]  E. Fiscus The Interaction between Osmotic- and Pressure-induced Water Flow in Plant Roots. , 1975, Plant physiology.

[10]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Efficiency and regulation of water transport in some woody and herbaceous species. , 1974, Plant physiology.

[11]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Leaf Water Potential Response to Transpiration by Citrus , 1974 .

[12]  J. L. Hailey,et al.  Resistance to Water Flow in Vigna sinensis L. (Endl.) at High Rates of Transpiration 1 , 1973 .

[13]  Anthony E. Hall,et al.  Interpreting Leaf Water Potential Measurements with a Model of the Soil‐Plant‐Atmosphere Continuum , 1972 .

[14]  Y. Waisel,et al.  Patterns of Water Movement in Trees and Shrubs , 1972 .

[15]  H. Mooney,et al.  Photosynthetic Adaptation to High Temperatures: A Field Study in Death Valley, California , 1972, Science.

[16]  W. R. Gardner,et al.  Internal Water Status and Water Transport in Seed Onion Plants1 , 1971 .

[17]  H. Ginsburg,et al.  Radial Water and Solute Flow in Roots of Zea maysIII. EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON THO AND ION TRANSPORT , 1971 .

[18]  J. Boyer Resistances to Water Transport in Soybean, Bean, and Sunflower 1 , 1971 .

[19]  P. E. Weatherley,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF THE ROOT SYSTEM ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE RATE OF TRANSPIRATION AND DEPRESSION OF LEAF WATER POTENTIAL , 1971 .

[20]  E. Newman Resistance to Water Flow in Soil and Plant. II. A Review of Experimental Evidence on the Rhizosphere Resistance , 1969 .

[21]  E. Newman RESISTANCE TO WATER FLOW IN SOIL AND PLANT I. SOIL RESISTANCE IN RELATION TO AMOUNTS OF ROOT: THEORETICAL , 1969 .

[22]  J. Boyer Free-Energy Transfer in Plants , 1969, Science.

[23]  H. D. Barrs,et al.  Cyclic Variations in Plant Properties under Constant Environmental Conditions , 1968 .

[24]  P. E. Weatherley,et al.  ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRANSPIRATION RATE AND LEAF WATER POTENTIAL , 1966 .

[25]  P. F. Scholander,et al.  Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants , 1965, Science.

[26]  W. Lopushinsky,et al.  Effect of Water Movement on Ion Movement into the Xylem of Tomato Roots. , 1964, Plant physiology.

[27]  W. R. Gardner,et al.  Lower Limit of Water Availability to Plants , 1964, Science.

[28]  P. E. Weatherley,et al.  The mechanism of water absorption by roots II. The role of hydrostatic pressure gradients across the cortex , 1957, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[29]  J. Dainty Water Relations of Plant Cells , 1976 .

[30]  H. Neumann,et al.  IN SITU MEASUREMENTS OF LEAF WATER POTENTIAL AND RESISTANCE TO WATER FLOW IN CORN, SOYBEAN, AND SUNFLOWER AT SEVERAL TRANSPIRATION RATES , 1974 .

[31]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Plant water balance—its relationship to atmospheric and edaphic conditions , 1974 .

[32]  P. Kramer,et al.  Diurnal Cycling in Root Resistance to Water Movement , 1974 .

[33]  P. E. Weatherley Some Aspects of Water Relations , 1970 .

[34]  E. Skidmore,et al.  Physiological Role in Regulating Transpiration Rate of the Cotton Plant 1 , 1964 .

[35]  T. H. Honert,et al.  Water transport in plants as a catenary process , 1948 .