Frequent false detection of positive selection by the likelihood method with branch-site models.

Positive Darwinian selection promotes fixations of advantageous mutations during gene evolution and is probably responsible for most adaptations. Detecting positive selection at the DNA sequence level is of substantial interest because such information provides significant insights into possible functional alterations during gene evolution as well as important nucleotide substitutions involved in adaptation. Efficient detection of positive selection, however, has been difficult because selection often operates on only a few sites in a short period of evolutionary time. A likelihood-based method with branch-site models was recently introduced to overcome such difficulties. Here I examine the accuracy of the method using computer simulation. I find that the method detects positive selection in 20%-70% of cases when the DNA sequences are generated by computer simulation under no positive selection. Although the frequency of such false detection varies depending on, among other things, the tree topology, branch length, and selection scheme, the branch-site likelihood method generally gives misleading results. Thus, detection of positive selection by this method alone is unreliable. This unreliability may have resulted from its over-sensitivity to violations of assumptions made in the method, such as certain distributions of selective strength among sites and equal transition/transversion ratios for synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions.

[1]  J. Zhang,et al.  Performance of likelihood ratio tests of evolutionary hypotheses under inadequate substitution models. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[2]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.

[3]  J. G. Burleigh,et al.  Adaptive evolution in the photosensory domain of phytochrome A in early angiosperms. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[4]  Z. Yang,et al.  Accuracy and power of the likelihood ratio test in detecting adaptive molecular evolution. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[5]  A. Meyer,et al.  The Ghost of Selection Past: Rates of Evolution and Functional Divergence of Anciently Duplicated Genes , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[6]  M. Nei,et al.  Small-sample tests of episodic adaptive evolution: a case study of primate lysozymes. , 1997, Molecular biology and evolution.

[7]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Evolution of the integral membrane desaturase gene family in moths and flies. , 2002, Genetics.

[8]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  Duplication and adaptive evolution of the chalcone synthase genes of Dendranthema (Asteraceae). , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  M. Adams,et al.  Inferring Nonneutral Evolution from Human-Chimp-Mouse Orthologous Gene Trios , 2003, Science.

[10]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. , 1998, Genetics.

[11]  J. McInerney,et al.  Fatty acid biosynthesis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Lateral gene transfer, adaptive evolution, and gene duplication , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Nei,et al.  Positive Darwinian selection after gene duplication in primate ribonuclease genes. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  O. Collin,et al.  The loss of the hemoglobin H2S-binding function in annelids from sulfide-free habitats reveals molecular adaptation driven by Darwinian positive selection , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R. DeSalle,et al.  Adaptive Evolution of Genes and Genomes , 2000, Heredity.

[15]  Masatoshi Nei,et al.  Simulation study of the reliability and robustness of the statistical methods for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[16]  M. Nei,et al.  Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection , 1988, Nature.

[17]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Adaptive evolution of a duplicated pancreatic ribonuclease gene in a leaf-eating monkey , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[18]  T Gojobori,et al.  A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[19]  Y Suzuki,et al.  Reliabilities of parsimony-based and likelihood-based methods for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[20]  Masatoshi Nei,et al.  False-positive selection identified by ML-based methods: examples from the Sig1 gene of the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii and the tax gene of a human T-cell lymphotropic virus. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[21]  F. Ayala,et al.  Convergent neofunctionalization by positive Darwinian selection after ancient recurrent duplications of the xanthine dehydrogenase gene , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  D. Irwin,et al.  Evolution of stomach lysozyme: the pig lysozyme gene. , 1996, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[23]  Z. Yang,et al.  Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[25]  T. Gojobori,et al.  Rapid evolution of goat and sheep globin genes following gene duplication. , 1983, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  E. Álvarez-Buylla,et al.  Adaptive evolution in the Arabidopsis MADS-box gene family inferred from its complete resolved phylogeny , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  W. Messier,et al.  Episodic adaptive evolution of primate lysozymes , 1997, Nature.

[28]  Joseph P Bielawski,et al.  Accuracy and power of bayes prediction of amino acid sites under positive selection. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[29]  N. Goldman,et al.  Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. , 2000, Genetics.

[30]  T. Barkman.  Evidence for positive selection on the floral scent gene isoeugenol-O-methyltransferase. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[31]  Jianzhi Zhang.  Evolution by gene duplication: an update , 2003 .

[32]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[33]  Doron Lancet,et al.  Human specific loss of olfactory receptor genes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Y. Gilad,et al.  Different noses for different people , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[35]  U. Sorhannus,et al.  The effect of positive selection on a sexual reproduction gene in Thalassiosira weissflogii (Bacillariophyta): results obtained from maximum-likelihood and parsimony-based methods. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[36]  Doron Lancet,et al.  Natural selection on the olfactory receptor gene family in humans and chimpanzees. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[37]  Joseph P. Bielawski,et al.  Maximum likelihood methods for detecting adaptive evolution after gene duplication , 2004, Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics.