Organizational response to environmental regulation: punctuated change or autogenesis?

Theory predicts that when faced with threatening new conditions, managers often attempt to preserve the status quo by creating a buffer between the organization and the outside world. This paper presents evidence that in response to new water pollution regulation, managers indeed created buffers of technology and personnel, but in some organizations this very equipment and personnel initiated a process of incremental change that led to better environmental protection, more efficient production, and in a few cases, entirely new product and production strategies. For public policy, this research suggests that environmental regulators should allow companies time and flexibility to learn and experiment. For organizational theory, this research suggests a link between punctuated-equilibrium models of organizational dynamics (Tushman and Romanelli, 1985) and theories of self-organizing systems (Drazin and Sandelands, 1992). That is, management may respond to external changes by attempting to preserve the status quo, but in so doing influence internal deep structures that then cause organizations to gradually evolve to different behaviours and shapes. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment

[1]  S. Hart A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[2]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[3]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[4]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[5]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Understanding Technological Responses of Industrial Firms to Environmental Problems: Implications for Government Policy (chapter) , 1993 .

[6]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Environmental and Organizational Context and Executive Team Structure , 1993 .

[7]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[8]  R. Drazin,et al.  Autogenesis: A Perspective on the Process of Organizing , 1992 .

[9]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[10]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[11]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[12]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism , 1999 .

[13]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design , 1977 .

[14]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  M. Halme Shifting environmental management paradigms in two Finnish paper facilities: a broader view of institutional theory , 1996 .

[16]  Ellen J. Langer,et al.  When Thinking Disrupts Intellectual Performance , 1981 .

[17]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[18]  C. Gersick REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[19]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[20]  Peter B. Cebon,et al.  'Twixt cup and lip organizational behaviour, technical prediction and conservation practice , 1992 .