Simulation of rail yard emissions transport to the near-source environment

Abstract Rail yards are important nodes in the freight transportation network. However, they are also a focus of public health concern when located in highly populated areas. Field characterization of near-rail yard air quality is challenging due to spatially- and temporally-variable emissions. Numerical models can provide valuable insight into factors affecting emission dispersion and resulting near-field air pollution. This study utilizes computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling to investigate near-field air pollution surrounding a generic, moderate-sized intermodal rail yard with emissions of a neutrally buoyant gaseous pollutant. Rail yard and surrounding neighborhood structures were added in succession to a base case to study the influence of surface roughness on the generic pollutant's spatial concentration profile. A spatially weighted emissions scenario revealed highly variable pollutant levels in downwind neighborhoods, strongly affected by wind direction. Rail yard topography resulted in a modest increase in near-field pollution levels. Densely located two-story homes surrounding the rail yard reduced downwind concentrations by 16% and 15% at 25 m and 100 m downwind of the rail yard boundary, respectively. A 6 m boundary wall surrounding the rail yard, with four open sections enabling traffic flow, reduced downwind pollution levels by 25% and 12% at 25 m and 100 m downwind, respectively. While average pollution levels were lower with the addition of neighborhoods and a surrounding boundary wall, high spatial variability in pollution levels resulted in some near-field areas experiencing increased pollution that are offset by reductions in other areas.

[1]  Mark S. Shephard,et al.  Automatic three‐dimensional mesh generation by the finite octree technique , 1984 .

[2]  Tracey Holloway,et al.  Emissions and air quality impacts of truck-to-rail freight modal shifts in the Midwestern United States. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Mathieu Ichard,et al.  CFD model simulation of dispersion from chlorine railcar releases in industrial and urban areas , 2009 .

[4]  Steven G. Perry,et al.  Model evaluation of roadside barrier impact on near-road air pollution , 2011 .

[5]  T. Shih,et al.  A New K-epsilon Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows: Model Development and Validation , 1994 .

[6]  Mike Bergin,et al.  Fuel-based fine particulate and black carbon emission factors from a railyard area in Atlanta , 2013, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  T. Shih,et al.  A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows , 1995 .

[8]  Steven G. Perry,et al.  A wind tunnel study of the effect of roadway configurations on the dispersion of traffic-related pollution , 2009 .

[9]  Yan Huang,et al.  Air quality impacts and health-benefit valuation of a low-emission technology for rail yard locomotives in Atlanta Georgia. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  D. Niemeier,et al.  Near-roadway air quality: synthesizing the findings from real-world data. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Impacts of noise barriers on near-road air quality , 2008 .

[12]  R. Harley,et al.  Implementation of a high-resolution Source-Oriented WRF/Chem model at the Port of Oakland , 2014 .

[13]  David E. Barnes,et al.  Inorganic and Organic Aerosols Downwind of California's Roseville Railyard , 2011 .