Randomized clinical trials and recent patterns in the use of statins.

BACKGROUND Three landmark trials involving 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) were published between 1994 and 1996 (the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study [4S], the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study, and the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events trial). These trials provided evidence that lipid-lowering therapy decreases cardiovascular events, including mortality. Whether these recent data caused a shift toward statin use has not been evaluated. METHODS Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey in 1980, 1981, 1985, and 1989 through 1998 were used. We analyzed 5053 visits by patients taking lipid-lowering medications to office-based physicians selected by stratified random sampling. The main outcome measure was use of specific lipid-lowering medications, including statins. RESULTS In 1980 resins and niacin were the most commonly used lipid-lowering medications. By 1985 rising use of fibrates caused reductions in niacin use and resin use. By 1989 statins replaced fibrates as the most heavily used medications. Statin use climbed continuously thereafter, accounting for 90% of visits by patients treated for hypercholesterolemia in 1998. In time series analyses, increases in overall statin use were temporally unrelated to the publication of clinical trials, although the 4S trial may have contributed to a shift from older statins to simvastatin. For patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy in 1993 to 1998, statin use was significantly more likely for female patients, white patients, and patients visiting cardiologists. CONCLUSIONS Although the market for lipid-lowering medications is dominated by statins, the rise in statins predated the recent clinical trials supporting their use.

[1]  D. Siegel,et al.  Use of cholesterol-lowering medications in the United States from 1991 to 1997. , 2000, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Gurwitz,et al.  Use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and lipid-lowering medications before recurrent acute myocardial infarction: missed opportunities for prevention? , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  L. Corr,et al.  Time trend analysis and variations in prescribing lipid lowering drugs in general practice , 1998, BMJ.

[4]  D. Gordon,et al.  Time trends in the use of cholesterol-lowering agents in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  Elsie R. Pamuk,et al.  Health, United States, 1998; with socioeconomic status and health chartbook , 1998 .

[6]  A. Gotto Cholesterol management in theory and practice. , 1997, Circulation.

[7]  H. Blackburn,et al.  Trends in cholesterol knowledge and screening and hypercholesterolemia awareness and treatment, 1980-1992. The Minnesota Heart Survey. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  B. Davis,et al.  The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  D. Hosmer,et al.  The impact of clinical trials on the use of medications for acute myocardial infarction. Results of a community-based study. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia , 1995 .

[11]  G. Jerums,et al.  Long-term efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin in a large cohort of elderly hypercholesterolemic patients. , 1995, Atherosclerosis.

[12]  Wei Chen,et al.  Falling cholecystectomy thresholds since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 1995, JAMA.

[13]  N. Santanello,et al.  Cholesterol reduction yields clinical benefit. A new look at old data. , 1995, Circulation.

[14]  A. Folsom,et al.  Population awareness and control of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  B J McNeil,et al.  Knowledge and practices of generalist and specialist physicians regarding drug therapy for acute myocardial infarction. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Rubenfire,et al.  Efficacy and safety of pravastatin in the long-term treatment of elderly patients with hypercholesterolemia. , 1994, The American journal of medicine.

[17]  N J Wald,et al.  By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease? , 1994, BMJ.

[18]  J. Mckenney,et al.  Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II) , 1993, JAMA.

[19]  R. Anda,et al.  Recent trends in the identification and treatment of high blood cholesterol by physicians. Progress and missed opportunities. , 1993, JAMA.

[20]  G. Lamas,et al.  Do the results of randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular drugs influence medical practice? The SAVE Investigators. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Kenneth G. Manton,et al.  “Equivalent Sample Size” and “Equivalent Degrees of Freedom” Refinements for Inference Using Survey Weights under Superpopulation Models , 1992 .

[22]  N. Santanello,et al.  Change in cholesterol awareness and action. Results from national physician and public surveys. , 1991, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  Daniel Steinberg,et al.  Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. The Expert Panel. , 1988, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  Stephen B. Soumerai,et al.  Payment Restrictions for Prescription Drugs under Medicaid , 1987 .

[25]  H. Fineberg Clinical evaluation: how does it influence medical practice? , 1987, Bulletin du cancer.

[26]  A. Buse,et al.  Elements of econometrics , 1972 .