GPR applied to mapping utilities along the route of the Line 4 (yellow) subway tunnel construction in São Paulo City, Brazil

The rapid industrial development and disorganized population growth in huge cities bring about various urban problems due to intense use of physical space on and below the surface. Subsurface problems in metropolitan areas are caused by subway line construction, which often follows the routes of utility networks, such as electric and telephone cables, water and gas pipes, storm sewers, etc. Usually, the main problems are related to damage or destruction of preexisting utilities, often putting human lives at risk. With the purpose of minimizing risks, GPR-profiling with 200 MHz antennae was done at two sites, both located in downtown Sao Paulo, Brazil. The objectives of this work were to map utilities or existing infrastructure in the subsurface in order to orient the construction of the Line 4 (yellow) subway tunnel in Sao Paulo. GPR profiles can detect water pipes, utility networks in the subsurface, and concrete foundation columns or pilings in subsoil up to 2 m depth. In addition, the GPR profiles also provided details of the target shapes in the subsurface. GPR interpretations combined with lithological information from boreholes and trenches opened in the study areas were extremely important in mapping of the correct spatial distribution of buried utilities at these two sites in Sao Paulo. This information improves and updates maps of utility placement, serves as a basis for planning of the geotechnical excavation of the Line 4 (yellow) subway tunnel in Sao Paulo, helps minimize problems related to destruction of preexisting utilities in the subsoil, and avoids risk of dangerous accidents. Language: en

[1]  H. Takiya,et al.  Tectónica e sedimentação na bacia de São Paulo , 1992 .

[2]  Carey Rappaport,et al.  Model Based Evaluation of Bridge Decks Using Ground Penetrating Radar , 2007, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[3]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Iron oxides as a cause of GPR reflections , 2002 .

[4]  Jorge Luís Porsani,et al.  Comparing performance of instrumental drift correction by linear and quadratic adjusting in inductive electromagnetic data , 2011 .

[5]  David J. Daniels,et al.  Surface-Penetrating Radar , 1996 .

[6]  George A. McMechan,et al.  GPR characterization of buried tanks and pipes , 1997 .

[7]  Ralf J. Weger,et al.  Full-resolution 3D GPR imaging , 2005 .

[8]  C. H. Dix SEISMIC VELOCITIES FROM SURFACE MEASUREMENTS , 1955 .

[9]  John M. Reynolds,et al.  An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics , 1997 .

[10]  Jorge Luís Porsani,et al.  Utilização do GPR para caracterizar tambores plásticos enterrados no sítio controlado de geofísica rasa do IAG/USP , 2006 .

[11]  Vagner Roberto Elis,et al.  Investigações geofísicas de superfície e de poço no sítio controlado de geofísica rasa do IAG-USP , 2004 .

[12]  Jorge Luís Porsani,et al.  O sítio controlado de geofísica rasa do IAG/USP: instalação e resultados GPR 2D-3D , 2006 .

[13]  A. Bitri,et al.  Evaluation of GPR techniques for civil-engineering applications: study on a test site , 2000 .

[14]  Vinicius R N dos Santos,et al.  Automatic classification of metallic targets using pattern recognition of GPR reflection: a study in the IAG-USP Test Site, Sao Paulo (Brazil) , 2010, Proceedings of the XIII Internarional Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[15]  Jun Du,et al.  Image enhancement with wave-equation redatuming: application to GPR data collected at public transportation sites , 2007 .

[16]  William A. Sauck,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar profiles over multiple steel tanks: Artifact removal through effective data processing , 2007 .

[17]  Evert Slob,et al.  Comparing detection and location performance of perpendicular and parallel broadside GPR antenna orientations , 2010 .