Predicting daylight illuminance by computer simulation techniques

,!The first step in evaluating the visual performance and energy efficiency provided by daylight requires an accurate estimation of the amount of daylight entering a building. Traditionally, the daylight performance of a building is often evaluated in terms of daylight factors with the calculations being based on the CIE overcast sky. In general, the daylight factor approach is quite simple to use but it cannot predict the dynamic variations in interior illuminance as sky conditions and the sun’s position change. The recently introduced concept of the daylight coefficient, which needs sky luminance data, provides an alternative approach. With the advances in computer technology, the computation of daylight illuminance using the two prediction methods can be conducted by a simulation program. This paper presents a study of the daylight factor and daylight coefficient approaches. The interior daylight illuminance data measured in a scale model and a classroom were compared with the simulated results using RADIANCE computer simulation software. It was found that, in general, the daylight coefficient approach performs better than daylight factor approach. Both methods tend to estimate the daylight illuminance less accurately when the measurement points in the classroom are far away from the window facade. It seems that the parameters for inter-reflection calculations including the furniture layout and external obstructions cannot be input into the RADIANCE program with sufficient detail for accurate simulation.

[1]  Anca D. Galasiu,et al.  Applicability of daylighting computer modeling in real case studies: comparison between measured and simulated daylight availability and lighting consumption , 2002 .

[2]  D. Enarun,et al.  Luminance models for overcast skies: Assessment using measured data , 1995 .

[3]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  The simulation of annual daylight illuminance distributions — a state-of-the-art comparison of six RADIANCE-based methods , 2000 .

[4]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  A Study of Solar Radiation Daylight Illuminance and Sky Luminance Data Measurements for Hong Kong , 2002 .

[5]  P. Tregenza The daylight factor and actual illuminance ratios , 1980 .

[6]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Validation of a lighting simulation program under real sky conditions , 1995 .

[7]  P. R. Tregenza,et al.  Subdivision of the sky hemisphere for luminance measurements , 1987 .

[8]  G. W. Larson,et al.  Rendering with radiance - the art and science of lighting visualization , 2004, Morgan Kaufmann series in computer graphics and geometric modeling.

[9]  A.J.F. Rutten,et al.  Sky luminance research imperative for adequate control of temporary supplementary artificial lighting installations , 1994 .

[10]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  A Study of 15 Sky Luminance Patterns against Hong Kong Data , 2003 .

[11]  P. J. Littlefair Daylight coefficients for practical computation of internal illuminances , 1992 .

[12]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  The BRE-IDMP dataset: a new benchmark for the validation of illuminance prediction techniques , 2001 .

[13]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  Evaluation of overcast-sky luminance models against measured Hong Kong data , 2001 .

[14]  Tariq Muneer,et al.  Evaluation of an all-sky meteorological radiation model against long-term measured hourly data , 1998 .