Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey

[1]  Catharine I Paules,et al.  Coronavirus Infections-More Than Just the Common Cold. , 2020, JAMA.

[2]  Publisher'sNote , 2019, Management Accounting Research.

[3]  A. Booth,et al.  A Scoping Review Found Increasing Examples of Rapid Qualitative Evidence Syntheses and no Methodological Guidance. , 2019, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  Abdullah Pandor,et al.  Delphi consensus reached to produce a decision tool for SelecTing Approaches for Rapid Reviews (STARR). , 2019, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  Andrea C Tricco,et al.  Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review. , 2019, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  Byron C. Wallace,et al.  Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis , 2019, Systematic Reviews.

[7]  Guy Tsafnat,et al.  A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies? , 2019, Systematic Reviews.

[8]  Andrea C. Tricco,et al.  Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation , 2019, Diagnostic and Prognostic Research.

[9]  A. Tricco,et al.  Using rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems and progress towards universal health coverage , 2019, BMJ Global Health.

[10]  D. Pieper,et al.  How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting , 2018, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[11]  Mourad Ouzzani,et al.  Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) , 2018, Systematic Reviews.

[12]  S. Redman,et al.  Do policy-makers find commissioned rapid reviews useful? , 2018, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[13]  David Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement , 2018, JAMA.

[14]  Patrick Felicia,et al.  An International Survey , 2018 .

[15]  Wojtek Wiercioch,et al.  Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 3: a systematic review shows limitations in most tools designed to assess quality and develop recommendations. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  Wojtek Wiercioch,et al.  Decision-making about healthcare related tests and diagnostic strategies : A review of methodological and practical challenges , 2017 .

[17]  Gerald Gartlehner,et al.  Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews: an international survey , 2017, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[18]  Lisa Hartling,et al.  Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews , 2017, Systematic Reviews.

[19]  John N. Lavis,et al.  What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review , 2016, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[20]  W. Maziak,et al.  Communicable disease surveillance and control in the context of conflict and mass displacement in Syria. , 2016, International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases.

[21]  D. Moher,et al.  Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[22]  David Moher,et al.  An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  David Moher,et al.  All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[24]  Alexander Tsertsvadze,et al.  How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously? , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[25]  Julie Polisena,et al.  Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[26]  Michael G. Wilson,et al.  Developing a rapid-response program for health system decision-makers in Canada: findings from an issue brief and stakeholder dialogue , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[27]  Lisa Hartling,et al.  EPC Methods: An Exploration of Methods and Context for the Production of Rapid Reviews , 2015 .

[28]  Holger J Schünemann,et al.  Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[29]  Lotty Hooft,et al.  Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[30]  S. Nancarrow,et al.  Rapid review of applications of e-health and remote monitoring for rural residents. , 2014, The Australian journal of rural health.

[31]  M. Leeflang.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy. , 2014, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[32]  Julie Polisena,et al.  RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT , 2014, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[33]  M. Leeflang,et al.  Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews , 2013, Systematic Reviews.

[34]  J. Glanville,et al.  Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[35]  Patrick M. M. Bossuyt,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy , 2013 .

[36]  David Moher,et al.  Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[37]  Frank Buntinx,et al.  The evidence base of clinical diagnosis , 2008 .

[38]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[39]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..