High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young

Only high-quality males can bear the costs of an extreme sexual display. As a consequence, such males are not only more attractive, but they often live longer than average. Recent theory predicts, however, that high-quality males should sometimes invest so heavily in sexual displays that they die sooner than lower quality males. We manipulated the phenotypic quality of field crickets, Teleogryllus commodus, by altering the protein content of their diet. Here we show that nymphs and adult females reared on a high-protein diet lived longer than those on a low-protein diet. In contrast, adult males reared on a high-protein diet died sooner than those on low-protein diets because they invested more energy in calling during early adulthood. Our findings uphold the theoretical prediction that the relationship between longevity and sexual advertisement may be dynamic (that is, either positive or negative), depending on local conditions such as resource availability. Moreover, they caution the use of longevity as a proxy for fitness in sexual selection studies, and suggest avenues for future research on the relationship between sexual attractiveness and ageing.

[1]  J L Wang,et al.  Early mortality surge in protein-deprived females causes reversal of sex differential of life expectancy in Mediterranean fruit flies. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. Kotiaho Testing the assumptions of conditional handicap theory: costs and condition dependence of a sexually selected trait , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Trade-offs between life-history traits and a secondary sexual character in male collared flycatchers , 1995, Nature.

[4]  H. Kokko Good genes, old age and life-history trade-offs , 1998, Evolutionary Ecology.

[5]  Robert Brooks,et al.  What is genetic quality? , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  Ilan Eshel,et al.  On Fisher-Zahavi's handicapped sexy son , 2000 .

[7]  J. Mappes,et al.  Male mating success and risk of predation in a wolf spider: a balance between sexual and natural selection? , 1998 .

[8]  Franz Huber,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[9]  B. Sheldon,et al.  The cost of reproduction and sexual selection , 1998 .

[10]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Towards a resolution of the lek paradox , 2001, Nature.

[11]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  A. Leroi,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life history evolution. 2. Diet, mates and the cost of reproduction , 1993 .

[13]  Oren Hasson,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle , 1984 .

[14]  G. Fink,et al.  Calorie restriction extends Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan by increasing respiration , 2002, Nature.

[15]  M. Petrie,et al.  Sexually Selected Traits and Adult Survival: A Meta-Analysis , 2001, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[16]  William E. Wagner,et al.  Nutritional effects on male calling behaviour in the variable field cricket , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  A. Jacot,et al.  Condition-dependent signaling affects male sexual attractiveness in field crickets, Gryllus campestris , 2003 .

[18]  D. Roff Life History, Evolution of , 2001 .

[19]  L. Rowe,et al.  The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  U. Candolin Changes in expression and honesty of sexual signalling over the reproductive lifetime of sticklebacks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  J. Kotiaho Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence , 2001, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[22]  A. Zahavi Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  L. Partridge,et al.  Sex differences in the effect of dietary restriction on life span and mortality rates in female and male Drosophila melanogaster. , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[24]  A. Grafen Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  D. Price,et al.  Good genes and old age: Do old mates provide superior genes? , 1995 .

[26]  H. Kokko,et al.  Female choice selects for lifetime lekking performance in black grouse males , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  M. Zuk,et al.  Exploitation of Sexual Signals by Predators and Parasitoids , 1998, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[28]  A. Houston,et al.  The sexual selection continuum , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  J L Wang,et al.  Dual modes of aging in Mediterranean fruit fly females. , 1998, Science.

[30]  R. Weindruch,et al.  Oxidative Stress, Caloric Restriction, and Aging , 1996, Science.