Positive phase error from parallel conductance in tetrapolar bio-impedance measurements and its compensation

Abstract Bioimpedance measurements are of great use and can provide considerable insight into biological processes. However, there are a number of possible sources of measurement error that must be considered. The most dominant source of error is found in bipolar measurements where electrode polarisation effects are superimposed on the true impedance of the sample. Even with the tetrapolar approach that is commonly used to circumvent this issue, other errors can persist. Here we characterise the positive phase and rise in impedance magnitude with frequency that can result from the presence of any parallel conductive pathways in the measurement set-up. It is shown that fitting experimental data to an equivalent electrical circuit model allows for more accurate determination of the true sample impedance as validated through finite element modelling (FEM) of the measurement chamber. Finally, the equivalent circuit model is used to extract dispersion information from cell cultures to characterise their growth.

[1]  Brian H. Brown,et al.  Bipolar and tetrapolar transfer impedance measurements from volume conductor , 2000 .

[2]  Brian A. Mazzeo,et al.  Parasitic capacitance influence of potential-sensing electrodes on four-electrode liquid impedance measurements , 2009 .

[3]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics , 2000 .

[4]  Javier Rosell,et al.  Four Versus Two-Electrode Measurement Strategies for Cell Growing and Differentiation Monitoring Using Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  J. Wegener,et al.  Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) as a noninvasive means to monitor the kinetics of cell spreading to artificial surfaces. , 2000, Experimental cell research.

[6]  D. Geselowitz An application of electrocardiographic lead theory to impedance plethysmography. , 1971, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[7]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Sources of error in tetrapolar impedance measurements on biomaterials and other ionic conductors , 2007 .

[8]  H. Fricke,et al.  XXXIII. The theory of electrolytic polarization , 1932 .

[9]  H P Schwan,et al.  ELECTRODE POLARIZATION IMPEDANCE AND MEASUREMENTS IN BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS * , 1968, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  E. Gersing,et al.  The appearance of positive phase angles in impedance measurements on extended biological objects , 1995 .

[11]  Brian A. Mazzeo,et al.  Two- and four-electrode, wide-bandwidth, dielectric spectrometer for conductive liquids: Theory, limitations, and experiment , 2007 .

[12]  Joseph D. Bronzino,et al.  The Biomedical Engineering Handbook , 1995 .

[13]  M. Sluyters-Rehbach,et al.  The analysis of electrode impedances complicated by the presence of a constant phase element , 1984 .

[14]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[15]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Testing miniaturized electrodes for impedance measurements within the β-dispersion – a practical approach , 2010 .