Crista Volume Measured from 3D Reconstructions of Weightbearing CT Scans Shows a Relationship to Sesamoid Station

Category: Bunion Introduction/Purpose: The progression of hallux valgus (HV) deformities results in dislocation of the sesamoids from their position (station) under the plantar surface of the distal first metatarsal. With this dislocation, the crista separating the two sesamoids erodes as the contact of the medial sesamoid with the crista applies pressure with weightbearing. Recently, three dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the metatarsals and first phalanx have demonstrated a means to find a consistently quantify first metatarsal pronation. These same reconstructions can also produce a reliable technique to compute the volumes of the bones involved. The purpose of the current investigation is to examine the relationship of the volume of the crista to pronation and to sesamoid station. Methods: Eleven HV patients and five normal subjects with weightbearing or weightbearing equivalent CT (WBCT) imaging were randomly selected from the senior author’s patients. Pronation was quantified on WBCT scans using 3D reconstructions as described by Campbell et al. (FAI 2018). Crista volume was determined using a line drawn to connect the nadir of each sulcus on either side of the intersesamoidal crista in each slice of the WBCT image (Figure 1). Sesamoid station was also quantified on WBCT scans using the established four point categorization. A linear regression was performed to determine if the volume of the crista was associated with the pronation angle. The sesamoid station was simplified into two categories - mild medial sesamoid subluxation (less than 50% of the medial sesamoid was lateral to the nadir of the crista) and severe medial sesamoid subluxation - and crista volume between these two groups was compared using a t-test. Results: The regression of crista volume against first metatarsal pronation angle did not show statistical significance (P=0.94, r2=0.03). The mean crista volume in the mild medial sesamoid subluxation group was 156(+-47, range 72 - 231)mm3. The mean crista volume in severe medial sesamoid subluxation was 95 (SD 39, range 35 - 160) mm3. The t-test using simplified sesamoid station to compare crista volumes found that the mean crista volume in the mild medial sesamoid subluxation group was statistically significantly greater the than the mean crista volume in the severe sesamoid subluxation group (P=0.01). Conclusion: In HV, it has been hypothesized that the medial sesamoid erodes the crista resulting in arthritis. This is often overlooked as a source of pain in these patients. Our study found that pronation of the first metatarsal was not correlated with crista volume suggesting that pronation does not affect erosion of the crista. Instead, our results are the first to demonstrate that medial sesamoid subluxation as determined from sesamoid station results in erosion of the crista. This supports the hypothesis that sesamoid subluxation, arthritis, and crista erosion are important components of the HV deformity.

[1]  S. Conti,et al.  A simple foot pedal device in a horizontal bore imaging facility replicates weightbearing outcomes for Hallux Valgus patients. , 2020, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[2]  S. Conti,et al.  Effect of the Modified Lapidus Procedure on Pronation of the First Ray in Hallux Valgus , 2019, Foot & ankle international.

[3]  S. Conti,et al.  Pilot Study of a 3-Dimensional Method for Analysis of Pronation of the First Metatarsal of Hallux Valgus Patients , 2018, Foot & ankle international.

[4]  Woo-Chun Lee,et al.  Recurrence of Hallux Valgus Can Be Predicted from Immediate Postoperative Non-Weight-Bearing Radiographs , 2017, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  Yasuhito Tanaka,et al.  Relationship Between Displacement and Degenerative Changes of the Sesamoids in Hallux Valgus , 2016, Foot & ankle international.

[6]  C. Gatot,et al.  Tibial Sesamoid Position Influence on Functional Outcome and Satisfaction After Hallux Valgus Surgery , 2016, Foot & ankle international.

[7]  C. Konrads,et al.  Treatment of hallux valgus deformity , 2016, EFORT open reviews.

[8]  H. Menz,et al.  Epidemiology of Shoe Wearing Patterns Over Time in Older Women: Associations With Foot Pain and Hallux Valgus , 2016, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[9]  K. Young,et al.  A New Measure of Tibial Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus in Relation to the Coronal Rotation of the First Metatarsal in CT Scans , 2015, Foot & ankle international.

[10]  B. Vicenzino,et al.  Gait parameters associated with hallux valgus: a systematic review , 2013, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research.

[11]  N. Chockalingam,et al.  Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements. , 2010, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[12]  Bill Vicenzino,et al.  Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2010, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[13]  B. Dedmond,et al.  The Hallucal Sesamoid Complex , 2006, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[14]  J. Limbers,et al.  Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgus. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  H. Menz,et al.  Gait Instability in Older People with Hallux Valgus , 2005, Foot & ankle international.

[16]  Cindy L. Skaruppa,et al.  The effect of sesamoid mobilization, flexor hallucis strengthening, and gait training on reducing pain and restoring function in individuals with hallux limitus: a clinical trial. , 2004, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[17]  H. Nathan,et al.  Hallux sesamoid bones. Anatomical observations with special reference to osteoarthritis and hallux valgus , 2004, International Orthopaedics.

[18]  F. Layher,et al.  Radiographic Changes in Forefoot Geometry with Weightbearing , 2003, Foot & ankle international.

[19]  A. Malmivaara,et al.  Hallux valgus: immediate operation versus 1 year of waiting with or without orthoses: A randomized controlled trial of 209 patients , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[20]  Y. Iwamoto,et al.  New Radiographic Analysis of Sesamoid Rotation in Hallux Valgus: Comparison with Conventional Evaluation Methods , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[21]  T. Kilmartin Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis. , 2002, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[22]  Charles L Saltzman,et al.  Angular Measurements in the Evaluation of Hallux Valgus Deformities: A Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the American Orthopædic Foot & Ankle Society on Angular Measurements , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[23]  H. Menz,et al.  The Contribution of Foot Problems to Mobility Impairment and Falls in Community‐Dwelling Older People , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[24]  P Paavolainen,et al.  Surgery vs orthosis vs watchful waiting for hallux valgus: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, JAMA.

[25]  K. D. Talbot,et al.  Assessing Sesamoid Subluxation: How Good Is the AP Radiograph? , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[26]  M. Coughlin Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Hallux Valgus*† , 1996 .

[27]  O. J. Lewis Anatomy of the Foot and Ankle. Descriptive, Topographic, Functional , 1984 .

[28]  Shahan K. Sarrafian,et al.  Anatomy of the Foot and Ankle: Descriptive, Topographic, Functional , 1983 .

[29]  R A Mann,et al.  Hallux valgus--etiology, anatomy, treatment and surgical considerations. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  R. Lopopolo Instructional Course Lectures , 1979 .

[31]  H. Piggott THE NATURAL HISTORY OF HALLUX VALGUS IN ADOLESCENCE AND EARLY ADULT LIFE , 1960 .

[32]  L. SIM-FOOK,et al.  A comparison of foot forms among the non-shoe and shoe-wearing Chinese population. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  I. Macnab,et al.  Hallux valgus and hallux rigidus; a critical survey of operative results. , 1952, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.