Biomechanical comparison of hard and soft hip protectors, and the influence of soft tissue.

INTRODUCTION Hip protectors appear to be promising in preventing hip fractures. Currently, many different hip protectors exist, and it is not clear which hip protector has the best biomechanical properties. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the force attenuation capacity of 10 different hip protectors. Both hard hip protectors, which primarily shunt away energy, and soft hip protectors, which primarily absorb energy, were included. METHODS Using a drop weight impact testing system and a surrogate femur, a weight of 25 kg was dropped from a height of 8 cm causing a force of almost 7,806 N on the bare femur, which simulates a severe fall. After this calibration test, soft tissue and the different hip protectors in combination with the soft tissue were tested. Each test was repeated six times. To simulate normal-weight elderly people, a 1/2-inch-thick layer of foam was chosen, reducing the force by 18%. To examine the influence of soft tissue thickness, soft tissue was also simulated by a 1-inch-thick layer of foam, reducing the force by 49%. RESULTS In the 1-inch soft tissue test, all hip protectors were capable in reducing the impact to below the average fracture threshold of elderly people (3,100 N), although the hard types performed significantly better than the soft ones (P < 0.001). In the 1/2-inch soft tissue test, only the hard hip protectors were capable of attenuating the peak force to below the average fracture threshold of 3,100 N (hard vs. soft hip protectors: P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study showed that the hard, energy-shunting hip protectors were superior to the soft, energy-absorbing ones, especially in a simulation of normal-weight elderly people. With increased soft tissue thickness, soft hip protectors were also capable in reducing the impact to below the average fracture threshold of 3,100 N.

[1]  W C Hayes,et al.  Force attenuation in trochanteric soft tissues during impact from a fall , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  Siegfried Derler,et al.  Anatomical hip model for the mechanical testing of hip protectors. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  Lex M Bouter,et al.  Prevention of hip fractures by external hip protectors: a randomized controlled trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[4]  Farhad Nabhani,et al.  Mechanical testing of hip protectors , 2002 .

[5]  S Derler,et al.  A finite element approach and experiments to assess the effectiveness of hip protectors. , 2004, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[6]  W C Hayes,et al.  Energy-shunting hip padding system attenuates femoral impact force in a simulated fall. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  L. Gillespie,et al.  Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in the elderly. , 2001, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[8]  P. Kannus,et al.  Energy‐shunting external hip protector attenuates the peak femoral impact force below the theoretical fracture threshold: An in vitro biomechanical study under falling conditions of thel elderly , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  P Kannus,et al.  Comparison of force attenuation properties of four different hip protectors under simulated falling conditions in the elderly: an in vitro biomechanical study. , 1999, Bone.

[10]  L. Bouter,et al.  Acceptance and Compliance with External Hip Protectors: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[11]  O. Edholm,et al.  Studies of gait and mobility in the elderly. , 1981, Age and ageing.

[12]  S. Shinkai,et al.  [Compliance in use of external protectors for hip fractures among the community elderly in Japan]. , 1999, Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi. Japanese journal of geriatrics.

[13]  B. Lawrence Riggs,et al.  Osteoporosis : etiology, diagnosis, and management , 1988 .

[14]  S. Cummings,et al.  A hypothesis: the causes of hip fractures. , 1989, Journal of gerontology.

[15]  N J Mills,et al.  The Biomechanics of Hip Protectors , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[16]  P. Kannus,et al.  Force attenuation properties of various trochanteric padding materials under typical falling conditions of the elderly , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  S. Yasumura,et al.  [Compliance concerning external protectors for hip fractures among the institutionalized elderly in Japan]. , 1999, Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi. Japanese journal of geriatrics.

[18]  Alan W. Eberhardt,et al.  Effects of Trochanteric Soft Tissues and Bone Density on Fracture of the Female Pelvis in Experimental Side Impacts , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  W C Hayes,et al.  Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  W C Hayes,et al.  Etiology and prevention of age-related hip fractures. , 1996, Bone.

[21]  M. Järvinen,et al.  Majority of Hip Fractures Occur as a Result of a Fall and Impact on the Greater Trochanter of the Femur: A Prospective Controlled Hip Fracture Study with 206 Consecutive Patients , 1999, Calcified Tissue International.