Reproducibility in the Assessment of Caries Lesion Behaviour: A Comparison between Conventional Film and Subtraction Radiography

The purpose of this study was to compare reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour in digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. Ninety–seven pairs of conventional film bite–wings were included. The radiographs had been taken with a Kwik–Bite filmholder without further standardisation. The selection criterion was that at least one surface imaged in a bite–wing pair should show progresssion of a caries lesion from the first exposure to the second. The time interval between the bite–wings was 1–2 years. The radiographs were scanned into a personal computer and the two images from the same patient subtracted. Seven observers scored the subtraction images and the conventional films. The scale was based on no change/ change in surface appearance scored in the following categories: 0 = no change; 1 = development of a new caries lesion in enamel; 2 = development of caries lesion in enamel and dentine/progression of an existing enamel lesion into dentine/progression of a dentinal lesion further into dentine; 3 = development of secondary caries; 4 = new filling/change of filling/extension of filling. Cohen’s κ coefficients were calculated for intra– and inter–observer agreement for the two radiographic methods separately. The κ value served as the statistical sampling unit for testing differences between the two methods (Wilcoxon’s test for ranked pairs). The average intra–observer κ value was 0.875 (range 0.775–0.958) for the subtraction images and 0.758 (range 0.560–0.890) for the conventional radiographs. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). For inter–observer agreement, the κ values were lower than for intra–observer agreement. The average value was 0.678 (range 0.485–0.754) for the subtraction images and 0.701 (range 0.497–0.817) for the conventional radiographs (p>0.1). This study suggests a new way of comparing reproducibility in terms of κ values between diagnostic methods in clinical studies where accuracy cannot be evaluated. The subtraction method may be useful in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour in the clinic.

[1]  A. Tveit,et al.  Detection of mineral loss in approximal enamel by subtraction radiography. , 1994, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[2]  A. Rugg-Gunn,et al.  Evaluation of a calibration trial to increase interexaminer reliability of radiographic diagnosis of approximal carious lesions. , 1980, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[3]  A. Tveit,et al.  Variations among dentists in radiographic detection of occlusal caries. , 1994, Caries research.

[4]  A. Tveit,et al.  Visualization of stannous fluoride treatment of carious lesions by subtraction radiography. , 1990, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[5]  A. Lussi.  Impact of including or excluding cavitated lesions when evaluating methods for the diagnosis of occlusal caries. , 1996, Caries research.

[6]  H. Worthington,et al.  Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system. , 1997, Journal of Periodontal Research.

[7]  A Wenzel,et al.  The choice of gold standard for evaluating tests for caries diagnosis. , 1999, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[8]  A. Tveit,et al.  Diagnostic quality and observer variation in radiographic diagnoses of approximal caries. , 1986, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[9]  R L Webber,et al.  X-ray image subtraction as a basis for assessment of periodontal changes. , 1982, Journal of periodontal research.

[10]  A. Tveit,et al.  Radiographic caries diagnosis by clinicians in Norway and Western Australia. , 1994, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[11]  Gröndahl Hg.  Radiographic caries diagnosis : a study of caries progression and observer performance , 1979 .

[12]  E. Hausmann,et al.  A model for dentinal caries progression by digital subtraction radiography. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  A. Wenzel.  Current trends in radiographic caries imaging. , 1995, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[14]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique. , 1984, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[15]  W D McDavid,et al.  Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection. , 1992, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[16]  A. Sheiham,et al.  Caries progression in 12- to 16-year-old schoolchildren in fluoridated and fluoride-deficient areas in Brazil. , 1997, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[17]  A. Lussi,et al.  Radiographic evaluation of occlusal caries: effect of training and experience. , 1995, Caries research.

[18]  J. Boffa,et al.  Reliability of coding depth of approximal carious lesions from non-independent interpretation of serial bitewing radiographs. , 1984, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[19]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[20]  P. Mileman,et al.  Decisions on restorative treatment and recall intervals based on bitewing radiographs. A comparison between national surveys of Dutch and Norwegian practitioners. , 1988, Community dental health.

[21]  A. Wenzel.  Matters to consider when implementing direct digital radiography in the dental office. , 1999, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[22]  E. Kidd,et al.  Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination. , 1997, Caries research.

[23]  P. Mileman,et al.  Effect of variation in caries diagnosis and degree of caries on treatment decisions by dental teachers using bitewing radiographs. , 1983, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[24]  M S Reddy,et al.  Digital subtraction radiography. , 1993, Dental clinics of North America.

[25]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Clinically undetected dental caries assessed by bitewing screening in children with little caries experience. , 1994, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[26]  A Wenzel,et al.  Digital subtraction radiography after stannous fluoride treatment for occlusal caries diagnosis. , 1992, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[27]  A Wenzel,et al.  Influence of computerized information technologies on image quality in dental radiographs. , 1991, Tandlaegebladet.

[28]  A. Lussi,et al.  The effect of experience and training on the diagnosis of approximal coronal caries from bitewing radiographs. A Swiss-American comparison. , 1994, Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia.

[29]  E. Hausmann.  Digital Subtraction Radiography: Then (1983) and Now (1998) , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[30]  A Wenzel,et al.  Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. , 1998, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[31]  B. McNeil,et al.  Examiner Reliability in Dental Radiography , 1986, Journal of dental research.

[32]  Gröndahl Hg.  The influence of observer performance in radiographic caries diagnosis. , 1979 .

[33]  E. Ariji,et al.  Observer agreement in the detection of proximal caries with direct digital intraoral radiography. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.