RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES
We undertook this study to determine whether differences in detector-lesion distance resulted in appreciable effects on digital magnification mammography performance as measured using the American College of Radiology (ACR) mammography phantom and a line pair test pattern.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Images of the standard 42-mm thick standard ACR mammography phantom with a wax insert on one side containing simulated fibers, calcifications, and masses were obtained on a Senographe Essential digital mammography system with the phantom in upright and inverted positions. The process was repeated with a line pair test pattern for measuring resolution. All images were obtained in contact mode, and with 1.5x and 1.8x magnification, and evaluated on a GE PACS monitor.
RESULTS
Overall, changing lesion-detector distance using standard versus inverted positioning did not appreciably increase the number of objects seen on the ACR phantom under all modes. No greater than one line pair difference was seen in standard versus inverted positioning. At 1.8x magnification mode, no difference was detected in line pair resolution with a change in positioning.
CONCLUSION
Differences in lesion-detector distance as modeled using both the ACR mammography phantom and a line pair test pattern did not make an appreciable difference in digital magnification mammography performance.
[1]
L Costaridou,et al.
Monte Carlo studies on the influence of focal spot size and intensity distribution on spatial resolution in magnification mammography
,
2008,
Physics in medicine and biology.
[2]
J. Ravenel.
The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd ed.
,
2003
.
[3]
E. Samei,et al.
Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
,
2006,
Medical physics.
[4]
G. W. Eklund,et al.
The art of mammographic positioning.
,
1992,
Radiologic clinics of North America.
[5]
J. Bushberg.
The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging
,
2001
.