SPLICE STRENGTH OF HIGH RELATIVE RIB AREA REINFORCING BARS

This paper describes the testing and analysis of 83 beam-splice specimens containing 16, 25, and 36 mm bars with relative rib areas ranging from 0.065 to 0.140. Concrete containing two different coarse aggregates were used to evaluate the effect of aggregate properties on bond strength. Sixty specimens contained uncoated bars with confining transverse reinforcement. Thirteen specimens contained uncoated bars without confining reinforcement, and 10 specimens contained epoxy-coated bars, nine without confining reinforcement, and one with confining reinforcement. The tests are analyzed to determine the effect of relative rib area and bar diameter on the increase in bond strength provided by confining reinforcement. The tests also provide a preliminary indication of the effect of high relative rib area on the splice strength of epoxy-coated bars. The splice strength of uncoated reinforcement confined by transverse reinforcement increases with an increase in the relative rib area and the bar diameter of the spliced bars. The increase in splice strength provided by transverse reinforcement increases as the strength of the coarse aggregate increases. The use of reinforcing bars with an average relative rib area of 0.1275, an increase from the average value for conventional bars of 0.0727, can provide up to a 26 percent decrease in splice length compared to conventional reinforcement when confining reinforcement is used. The savings obtainable with high relative rib area bars is highest for low covers and bar spacings. Epoxy coating seems to have a less detrimental effect on splice strength for high relative rib area bars than for conventional bars. The results indicate that the maximum development length modification factor used for epoxy-coated reinforcement may be reduced by 20 percent.

[1]  David Darwin,et al.  Bond of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcement: Splices , 1993 .

[2]  David Darwin,et al.  Effect of Deformation Height and Spacing on Bond Strength of Reinforcing Bars , 1993 .

[3]  David Darwin,et al.  Development Length Criteria: Bars Without Transverse Reinforcement , 1992 .

[4]  Phil M. Ferguson,et al.  Development Length for Large High Strength Reinforcing Bars , 1965 .

[5]  Tel Rezansoff,et al.  TENSILE LAP SPLICES UNDER STATIC LAODING: A REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED ACI 318 CODE PROVISIONS , 1993 .

[6]  C J Hester BOND OF EPOXY-COATED REINFORCEMENT TO CONCRETE SPLICES , 1991 .

[7]  S. J. Chamberlin,et al.  Spacing of Spliced Bars in Beams , 1958 .

[8]  John E. Breen,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF MULTIPLE LAP SPLICES IN WIDE SECTIONS. , 1975 .

[9]  David Darwin,et al.  BOND OF EPOXY-COATED REINFORCEMENT: BAR PARAMETERS , 1991 .

[10]  James Chinn,et al.  Lapped Splices in Reinforced ConcreteBeams , 1955 .

[11]  David Darwin,et al.  Development Length Criteria: Bars Not Confined by Transverse Reinforcement , 1992 .

[12]  John E. Breen,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF SHEAR ON LAPPED SPLICES IN REINFORCED CONCRETE , 1981 .

[13]  T. Rezansoff,et al.  Confinement limits for tension lap slices under static loading , 1992 .

[14]  Robert G. Mathey,et al.  Investigation of Bond In Beam and Pull-Out Specimens with High-Yield -Strength Deformed Bars , 1961 .

[15]  John E. Breen,et al.  Lapped Splices For High Strength Reinforcing Bars , 1965 .

[16]  Phil M. Ferguson an dJ. Neils Thompson Development Length of High Strength Reinforcing Bars in Bond , 1962 .

[17]  David Darwin,et al.  DEVELOPMENT LENGTH CRITERIA FOR CONVENTIONAL AND HIGH RELATIVE RIB AREA REINFORCING BARS , 1996 .

[18]  S. J. Chamberlin Spacing of Reinforcement in Beams , 1956 .

[19]  Atorod Azizinamini,et al.  Tension development length of reinforcing bars embedded in high-strength concrete , 1995 .

[20]  James O. Jirsa,et al.  Bond Strength of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Bars , 1989 .

[21]  Atorod Azizinamini,et al.  Bond Performance of Reinforcing Bars Embedded in High-Strength Concrete , 1993 .