Introduction to the special issue on critical realism.

This special issue explores how philosophy of science matters for both research and social action in community psychology. It explores the complex issue of what might be appropriate philosophical bases for community psychology theory, research, and practice. In particular, it focuses on critical realism, a relatively new approach to the philosophy of science. In this introductory article, we start by discussing the importance of philosophy of science for community psychologists. We then situate our subject by exploring the history of paradigms in community psychology. We next offer a brief description of critical realism by describing its assumptions on ontology (nature of the world), epistemology (theory of knowledge), axiology (theory of values), and methodology (theory of action).

[1]  J. Jagosh,et al.  Retroductive theorizing in Pawson and Tilley's applied scientific realism , 2020 .

[2]  Giele Martins de Aguiar,et al.  Community Psychology , 2020, Definitions.

[3]  B. Danermark.  Applied interdisciplinary research: a critical realist perspective , 2019, Journal of Critical Realism.

[4]  L. Price.  Introduction to the special issue: normativity , 2019, Journal of Critical Realism.

[5]  D. Pilgrim.  Critical realism, psychology and the legacies of psychoanalysis , 2017 .

[6]  E. Trickett.  Seymour Sarason Remembered: “Plus ça change…”, “Psychology Misdirected”, and “Community Psychology and the Anarchist Insight” , 2015, American journal of community psychology.

[7]  Denise E. De Souza,et al.  Culture, context and society – The underexplored potential of critical realism as a philosophical framework for theory and practice , 2014 .

[8]  John Mingers,et al.  Systems Thinking, Critical Realism and Philosophy: A Confluence of Ideas , 2014, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  P. Gorski,et al.  “What is Critical Realism? And Why Should You Care?” , 2013 .

[10]  Denise E. De Souza,et al.  Elaborating the Context-Mechanism-Outcome configuration (CMOc) in realist evaluation: A critical realist perspective , 2013 .

[11]  T. Christ.  The worldview matrix as a strategy when designing mixed methods research , 2013 .

[12]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist methods in medical education research: what are they and what can they contribute? , 2012, Medical education.

[13]  Joseph O'Mahoney,et al.  Critical Realism and the Self , 2011 .

[14]  S. Houston.  Prising Open the Black Box , 2010 .

[15]  B. Poland,et al.  Health Psychology and Social Action , 2006, Journal of health psychology.

[16]  S. Fleetwood.  Ontology in Organization and Management Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective , 2005 .

[17]  A. Madill,et al.  Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[18]  A. Sayer,et al.  Realism and Social Science , 1999 .

[19]  M. Archer,et al.  Critical Realism and Research Methodology , 1999 .

[20]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  Critical Realism , 2011 .

[21]  Mervyn Hartwig,et al.  Dictionary of Critical Realism , 2007 .

[22]  J. Rappaport,et al.  Redefining social problems , 1986 .