Knowledge of the location and magnitude of the resistance to water flow in a plant is fundamental for describing whole plant response to water stress. The reported magnitudes of these resistances vary widely, principally because of the difficulty of measuring water potential within the plant. A number of interrelated experiments are described in which the water potential of a covered, nontranspiring leaf attached to a transpiring sorghum plant (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench) was used as a measure of the potential at the root-shoot junction. This allowed a descriptive evaluation of plant resistance to be made.The water potentials of a covered, nontranspiring leaf and a nonabsorbing root in solution, both attached to an otherwise actively transpiring and absorbing plant, were found to be similar. This supported the hypothesis that covered leaf water potential was equilibrating at a point shared by the vascular connections of both leaves and roots, i.e. the nodal complex of the root-shoot junction or crown. The difference in potential between a covered and exposed leaf together with calculated individual leaf transpiration rates were used to evaluate the resistance between the plant crown and the exposed leaf lamina called the connection resistance. There was an apparent decrease in the connection resistance as the transpiration rate increased; this is qualitatively explained as plant capacitance.Assuming that the covered leaf water potential was equal to that in the root xylem at the point of water absorption in the experimental plants with relatively short root axes, calculated radial root resistances were strongly dependent on the transpiration rate. For plants with moderate to high transpiration rates the roots had a slightly larger resistance than the shoots.
[1]
H. Neumann,et al.
IN SITU MEASUREMENTS OF LEAF WATER POTENTIAL AND RESISTANCE TO WATER FLOW IN CORN, SOYBEAN, AND SUNFLOWER AT SEVERAL TRANSPIRATION RATES
,
1974
.
[2]
J. Ritchie,et al.
Dryland Evaporative Flux in a Subhumid Climate: IV. Relation to Plant Water Status 1
,
1972
.
[3]
J E Begg,et al.
Water potential gradients in field tobacco.
,
1970,
Plant physiology.
[4]
J. L. Hailey,et al.
Resistance to Water Flow in Vigna sinensis L. (Endl.) at High Rates of Transpiration 1
,
1973
.
[5]
Hanno Riceter.
Frictional Potential Losses and Total Water Potential in Plants: a Re-evaluation
,
1973
.
[6]
P. Weatherwax.
The nodal complex in grasses
,
1967
.
[7]
B. Sharman,et al.
The Vascular Pattern of Festucoid Grass Axes, with Particular Reference to Nodal Plexi
,
1971,
Botanical Gazette.
[8]
P. Kramer.
ROOT RESISTANCE AS A CAUSE OF THE ABSORPTION LAG
,
1938
.
[9]
B. C. Sharman,et al.
Developmental Anatomy of the Shoot of Zea mays L
,
1942
.
[10]
E. Fiscus.
The Interaction between Osmotic- and Pressure-induced Water Flow in Plant Roots.
,
1975,
Plant physiology.
[11]
K. Barley,et al.
Resistance to Water Flow in the Roots of Cereals
,
1976
.
[12]
E. Newman,et al.
A METHOD OF ESTIMATING THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ROOT IN A SAMPLE
,
1966
.
[13]
J. Boyer.
Resistances to Water Transport in Soybean, Bean, and Sunflower 1
,
1971
.
[14]
G. F. Arkin,et al.
Sorghum Root Morphogenesis and Growth. I. Effect of Maturity Genes 1
,
1977
.