Kinetic models of hematopoietic differentiation

As cell and molecular biology is becoming increasingly quantitative, there is an upsurge of interest in mechanistic modeling at different levels of resolution. Such models mostly concern kinetics and include gene and protein interactions as well as cell population dynamics. The final goal of these models is to provide experimental predictions, which is now taking on. However, even without matured predictions, kinetic models serve the purpose of compressing a plurality of experimental results into something that can empower the data interpretation, and importantly, suggesting new experiments by turning “knobs” in silico. Once formulated, kinetic models can be executed in terms of molecular rate equations for concentrations or by stochastic simulations when only a limited number of copies are involved. Developmental processes, in particular those of stem and progenitor cell commitments, are not only topical but also particularly suitable for kinetic modeling due to the finite number of key genes involved in cellular decisions. Stem and progenitor cell commitment processes have been subject to intense experimental studies over the last decade with some emphasis on embryonic and hematopoietic stem cells. Gene and protein interactions governing these processes can be modeled by binary Boolean rules or by continuous‐valued models with interactions set by binding strengths. Conceptual insights along with tested predictions have emerged from such kinetic models. Here we review kinetic modeling efforts applied to stem cell developmental systems with focus on hematopoiesis. We highlight the future challenges including multi‐scale models integrating cell dynamical and transcriptional models.

[1]  Adam L. Maclean,et al.  Concise Review: Stem Cell Population Biology: Insights from Hematopoiesis , 2016, Stem cells.

[2]  Jie Han,et al.  Stochastic Boolean networks: An efficient approach to modeling gene regulatory networks , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[3]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  Hard-wired heterogeneity in blood stem cells revealed using a dynamic regulatory network model , 2013, Bioinform..

[4]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Probabilistic Boolean networks: a rule-based uncertainty model for gene regulatory networks , 2002, Bioinform..

[5]  Hillel Kugler,et al.  A method to identify and analyze biological programs through automated reasoning , 2016, npj Systems Biology and Applications.

[6]  Jean-Loup Faulon,et al.  Boolean dynamics of genetic regulatory networks inferred from microarray time series data , 2007, Bioinform..

[7]  Erik Aurell,et al.  Quasi-potential landscape in complex multi-stable systems , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[8]  Sui Huang,et al.  Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[9]  Marek Kimmel,et al.  Hematopoiesis and its disorders: a systems biology approach. , 2010, Blood.

[10]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Computational modelling of embryonic stem-cell fate control , 2015, Development.

[12]  Berthold Göttgens,et al.  Modeling Reveals Bistability and Low-Pass Filtering in the Network Module Determining Blood Stem Cell Fate , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  Sean C. Bendall,et al.  Wishbone identifies bifurcating developmental trajectories from single-cell data , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  On schemes of combinatorial transcription logic , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Kate Smith-Miles,et al.  Mathematical modeling of GATA-switching for regulating the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cell , 2014, BMC Systems Biology.

[16]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[17]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Genetic control of flower morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a logical analysis , 1999, Bioinform..

[18]  Fabian J. Theis,et al.  Diffusion maps for high-dimensional single-cell analysis of differentiation data , 2015, Bioinform..

[19]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Simulating the Mammalian Blastocyst - Molecular and Mechanical Interactions Pattern the Embryo , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Towards an understanding of lineage specification in hematopoietic stem cells: a mathematical model for the interaction of transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  Jin Wang,et al.  Quantifying the Waddington landscape and biological paths for development and differentiation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  René Thomas,et al.  Biological Feedback , 2019 .

[24]  M. A. Shea,et al.  The OR control system of bacteriophage lambda. A physical-chemical model for gene regulation. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  J. Ferrell Bistability, Bifurcations, and Waddington's Epigenetic Landscape , 2012, Current Biology.

[26]  Luis Mendoza,et al.  A Network Model to Describe the Terminal Differentiation of B Cells , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  C. Peterson,et al.  Computational Multiscale Modeling of Embryo Development This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Genetics of System Biology Models of Embryo Development , 2022 .

[28]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Computational Modeling of the Hematopoietic Erythroid-Myeloid Switch Reveals Insights into Cooperativity, Priming, and Irreversibility , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[29]  J. Monod,et al.  Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. , 1961, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  C. Peterson,et al.  A deterministic method for estimating free energy genetic network landscapes with applications to cell commitment and reprogramming paths , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[31]  S. Emmott,et al.  Defining an essential transcription factor program for naïve pluripotency , 2014, Science.

[32]  G. K. Ackers,et al.  Quantitative model for gene regulation by lambda phage repressor. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  D. Papatsenko,et al.  Emerging Modeling Concepts and Solutions in Stem Cell Research. , 2016, Current topics in developmental biology.

[34]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Probing the role of stochasticity in a model of the embryonic stem cell – heterogeneous gene expression and reprogramming efficiency , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[35]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Dynamical analysis of a generic Boolean model for the control of the mammalian cell cycle , 2006, ISMB.

[36]  Mariano J. Alvarez,et al.  Quantitative modeling of the terminal differentiation of B cells and mechanisms of lymphomagenesis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Irreversibility of T-Cell Specification: Insights from Computational Modelling of a Minimal Network Architecture , 2016, PloS one.

[38]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[39]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  A novel dynamic model of hematopoietic stem cell organization based on the concept of within-tissue plasticity. , 2002, Experimental hematology.

[40]  Francesco Amato,et al.  Computational Modeling of a Transcriptional Switch Underlying B-Lymphocyte Lineage Commitment of Hematopoietic Multipotent Cells , 2015, PloS one.

[41]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Model for cooperative control of positional information in Drosophila by bicoid and maternal hunchback. , 1995, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[42]  P. Lásló,et al.  Multilineage Transcriptional Priming and Determination of Alternate Hematopoietic Cell Fates , 2006, Cell.

[43]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation of Lineage Commitment - A Stochastic Model of Cell Fate Decisions , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  B. Povinelli,et al.  Single cell analysis of normal and leukemic hematopoiesis. , 2017, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[45]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Predicting stochastic gene expression dynamics in single cells. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Inferring rules of lineage commitment in haematopoiesis , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[47]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Logical modeling of lymphoid and myeloid cell specification and transdifferentiation , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Ana Cvejic,et al.  Mechanisms of fate decision and lineage commitment during haematopoiesis , 2016, Immunology and cell biology.

[49]  A. Kierzek,et al.  Bridging the gap between stochastic and deterministic regimes in the kinetic simulations of the biochemical reaction networks. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[50]  R. O. Grondin,et al.  Synchronous and asynchronous systems of threshold elements , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.

[51]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Genetic networks with canalyzing Boolean rules are always stable. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  Kim Sneppen,et al.  Nanog, Oct4 and Tet1 interplay in establishing pluripotency , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[53]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Stochastic Modeling of B Lymphocyte Terminal Differentiation and Its Suppression by Dioxin , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[54]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Kinetic analysis of a molecular model of the budding yeast cell cycle. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[55]  Florian Greil,et al.  Dynamics of critical Kauffman networks under asynchronous stochastic update. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[56]  C. Peterson,et al.  A somatic mutation of GFI1B identified in leukemia alters cell fate via a SPI1 (PU.1) centered genetic regulatory network. , 2016, Developmental biology.

[57]  Berthold Göttgens,et al.  Determining Physical Mechanisms of Gene Expression Regulation from Single Cell Gene Expression Data , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[58]  Isabelle S. Peter,et al.  Predictive computation of genomic logic processing functions in embryonic development , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Multi‐scale modeling of GMP differentiation based on single‐cell genealogies , 2012, The FEBS journal.

[60]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Hierarchical Differentiation of Myeloid Progenitors Is Encoded in the Transcription Factor Network , 2011, PloS one.

[61]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Decoding the Regulatory Network for Blood Development from Single-Cell Gene Expression Measurements , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[62]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Transcriptional Dynamics of the Embryonic Stem Cell Switch , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[63]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  A deterministic map of Waddington's epigenetic landscape for cell fate specification , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[64]  M. Greaves,et al.  Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system. , 1997, Genes & development.

[65]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Gene Expression and Genome-wide Transcription Factor Binding during Lineage Specification of Multipotent Progenitors , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[66]  Berthold Göttgens,et al.  Reconstructing blood stem cell regulatory network models from single-cell molecular profiles , 2017 .

[67]  L. Glass,et al.  The logical analysis of continuous, non-linear biochemical control networks. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[68]  F. Crauste,et al.  A multi-scale model of erythropoiesis , 2010, Journal of biological dynamics.