Overall clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in 600 consecutive eyes: A large retrospective case series

Purpose: To analyze the overall clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in 600 consecutive cases. Methods: Retrospective, consecutive interventional case series operated by a single surgeon. Six hundred consecutive eyes of 524 patients with endothelial dysfunctions of different etiologies scheduled for DMEK were included in this study. All donor tissues were prepared by the operating surgeon during the procedure, using McCarey Kaufman medium or Cornisol-preserved cornea with endothelial cell density (ECD) of ≥2500 cells/mm2. Indications, postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), ECD, endothelial cell loss (ECL), and complications were analyzed postoperatively between 3 months and 2 years. Results: The commonest indication was post-cataract corneal edema/bullous keratopathy in 262 (43.7%) eyes followed by Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy 218 (36.3%). Vision affected comorbidities were present in 91 (15.2%) eyes. In phakic eyes with cataract (222; 37%), DMEK was combined with cataract surgery (Triple-DMEK). BSCVA of ≥20/25 was achieved in 41.0%, 46.4%, 49.2%, and 48.7% of eyes at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively and stabilized at 6 months (P = 0.54). Mean ECD decreased from 2884 ± 178 cells/mm2 (n = 600) before surgery to 2223 ± 321 (n = 597), 2099 ± 354 (n = 524), 1918 ± 373 (n = 374), and 1772 ± 439 cells/mm2 (n = 158) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months respectively. The corresponding mean ECL was 22.9 ± 11.4%, 27.2 ± 12.4%, 33.5 ± 13.0%, and 38.6 ± 14.3%, respectively (P < 0.05 for all-time points). The commonest complication was DM detachment in 59 (9.8%) eyes of which 23 (3.8%) eyes required rebubbling. Three (0.5%) eyes had primary graft failure. Endothelial rejection occurred in 7 (1.2%) eyes until the last follow-up. Conclusion: DMEK is a safe and effective procedure in different types of endothelial diseases with encouraging surgical and clinical outcomes. Complications are less and ECL percentage up to 2 years is acceptable.

[1]  D. Rootman,et al.  Outcomes of the first 250 eyes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Canadian centre experience. , 2018, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[2]  S. Basak,et al.  Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Using Surgeon’s Prepared Donor DM-Roll in Consecutive 100 Indian Eyes , 2018, The open ophthalmology journal.

[3]  D. DeMill,et al.  Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Donor Tissue: Surgical Technique and Early Clinical Results , 2018, Cornea.

[4]  Anthony N Kuo,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and Outcomes: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[5]  K. Tran,et al.  Prestained and Preloaded DMEK Grafts: An Evaluation of Tissue Quality and Stain Retention , 2017, Cornea.

[6]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Two-Year Clinical Outcome of 500 Consecutive Cases Undergoing Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[7]  Christopher G. Stoeger,et al.  Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Prestripped, Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts , 2017, Cornea.

[8]  M. Hellmich,et al.  Incidence and Clinical Course of Immune Reactions after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Retrospective Analysis of 1000 Consecutive Eyes. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[9]  P. Phillips,et al.  Experienced DSAEK Surgeon's Transition to DMEK: Outcomes Comparing the Last 100 DSAEK Surgeries With the First 100 DMEK Surgeries Exclusively Using Previously Published Techniques , 2016, Cornea.

[10]  I. Dapena,et al.  Ten-Year Clinical Outcome of the First Patient Undergoing Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2016, Cornea.

[11]  Vipul Bhandari,et al.  Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in South Asian Population , 2016, Journal of ophthalmic & vision research.

[12]  F. Kruse,et al.  Long-term Clinical Outcome After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  N. V. Prajna,et al.  A Prospective, In Vitro, Randomized Study to Compare Two Media for Donor Corneal Storage , 2016, Cornea.

[14]  Vipul Bhandari,et al.  Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Fellow Eye for Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy: A Retrospective Study , 2015, BioMed research international.

[15]  Z. M. Mayko,et al.  The First 100 Eyes of Standardized Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Standardized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[16]  I. Dapena,et al.  Clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2015, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[17]  Ashik Mohamed,et al.  Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Review of Indications at a Tertiary Eye Care Centre in South India , 2014, Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  F. Price,et al.  Air reinjection and endothelial cell density in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Five‐year follow‐up , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[19]  V. Scorcia,et al.  Ultrathin descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[20]  Ruth Quilendrino,et al.  Near complete visual recovery and refractive stability in modern corneal transplantation: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). , 2013, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[21]  M. Terry,et al.  Three-year visual acuity outcomes after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[22]  F. Kruse,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  Frederico P. Guerra,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[24]  Frederico P. Guerra,et al.  Endothelial Keratoplasty: Fellow Eyes Comparison of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2011, Cornea.

[25]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Efficacy of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcome of 200 consecutive cases after a learning curve of 25 cases. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  K. Droutsas,et al.  Learning Curve in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: First Series of 135 Consecutive Cases. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[27]  Ramesh S. Ve,et al.  Importance of population-based studies in clinical practice , 2011, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  M. Price,et al.  Endothelial keratoplasty – a review , 2010, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[29]  K. Hammersmith Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Prospective Multicenter Study of Visual and Refractive Outcomes and Endothelial Survival , 2010 .

[30]  Anoop Nagwani,et al.  Storage , 2010, Web Operations.

[31]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Descemet ’ s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty : Safety and Outcomes , 2022 .

[32]  S. Basak Descemet stripping and endothelial keratoplasty in endothelial dysfunctions: Three-month results in 75 eyes , 2008, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  G. Melles,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). , 2006, Cornea.

[34]  S. K. Seah,et al.  Anterior chamber depth and the risk of primary angle closure in 2 East Asian populations. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[35]  J T Holladay,et al.  Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. , 1997, Journal of refractive surgery.