Observer variability among colposcopists from the West Midlands region
暂无分享,去创建一个
J. Dunn | M. Shafi | J. Jordan | D. Luesley | I. Etherington | L. Hiller | David Luesley | Louise Hiller | Janet A. Dunn | J. A. Jordan
[1] P. Kenemans,et al. Observer agreement on interpreting colposcopic images of CIN. , 1995, Gynecologic oncology.
[2] M. Shafi. Controversies in Management: Management of women with mild dyskaryosis Cytological surveillance avoids overtreatment , 1994 .
[3] W. P. Soutter,et al. Controversies in Management: Immediate referral to colposcopy is safer , 1994 .
[4] H. Kitchener,et al. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis , 1994, BMJ.
[5] M I Shafi,et al. Digital imaging colposcopy, image analysis and quantification of the colposcopic image , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[6] Craine Bl,et al. Digital imaging colposcopy: basic concepts and applications. , 1993 .
[7] D. Howe,et al. Colposcopically directed punch biopsy: a potentially misleading investigation , 1992, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[8] A. Silman,et al. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. , 1992, BMJ.
[9] T. Krausz,et al. Reliability of colposcopy and directed punch biopsy , 1990, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[10] R. Newcombe,et al. Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1989, BMJ.
[11] B L Craine,et al. Digital imaging colposcopy: basic concepts and applications. , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.