Crossing Frontiers in Tackling Pathways of Biological Invasions

Substantial progress has been made in understanding how pathways underlie and mediate biological invasions. However, key features of their role in invasions remain poorly understood, available knowledge is widely scattered, and major frontiers in research and management are insufficiently characterized. We review the state of the art, highlight recent advances, identify pitfalls and constraints, and discuss major challenges in four broad fields of pathway research and management: pathway classification, application of pathway information, management response, and management impact. We present approaches to describe and quantify pathway attributes (e.g., spatiotemporal changes, proxies of

[1]  Keith R Hayes,et al.  Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  K. Simmonds,et al.  The International Maritime Organization , 1994 .

[3]  Gregory M. Ruiz,et al.  Arctic shipping and marine invaders , 2014 .

[4]  L. Musselman Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States , 1994, Economic Botany.

[5]  T. Blackburn,et al.  The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology , 2009 .

[6]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Live plant imports: the major pathway for forest insect and pathogen invasions of the US , 2012 .

[7]  Daniel Sol,et al.  TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[8]  B. Gallardo,et al.  The 'dirty dozen': socio-economic factors amplify the invasion potential of 12 high-risk aquatic invasive species in Great Britain and Ireland. , 2013 .

[9]  Murray A. Rudd,et al.  Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy , 2011 .

[10]  P. Hulme Invasion pathways at a crossroad: policy and research challenges for managing alien species introductions , 2015 .

[11]  D. Richardson,et al.  Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[13]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  A Generic Impact‐Scoring System Applied to Alien Mammals in Europe , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  T. Blackburn,et al.  Patterns of non-randomness in the composition and characteristics of the Taiwanese bird trade , 2014, Biological Invasions.

[15]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Effect of the Internet Commerce on Dispersal Modes of Invasive Alien Species , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  Economic Impacts of Non-Native Forest Insects in the Continental United States , 2011, PloS one.

[17]  Arnaud Estoup,et al.  Multiple Transatlantic Introductions of the Western Corn Rootworm , 2005, Science.

[18]  M. Shaw,et al.  Epidemiological risk assessment using linked network and grid based modelling: Phytophthora ramorum and Phytophthora kernoviae in the UK. , 2009 .

[19]  Matthew R. Helmus,et al.  Island biogeography of the Anthropocene , 2014, Nature.

[20]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy , 2008 .

[21]  J. Pergl,et al.  Alien Plants Introduced by Different Pathways Differ in Invasion Success: Unintentional Introductions as a Threat to Natural Areas , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  M. Clout,et al.  Invasive species management: a handbook of principles and techniques , 2009 .

[23]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  A Unified Classification of Alien Species Based on the Magnitude of their Environmental Impacts , 2014, PLoS biology.

[24]  D. Kim Rossmo,et al.  Geographic profiling as a novel spatial tool for targeting the control of invasive species , 2012 .

[25]  T. Blackburn,et al.  Avian Invasions: The Ecology and Evolution of Exotic Birds , 2009 .

[26]  C. Geibel,et al.  Heavy-fermion superconductivity atTc=2K in the antiferromagnet UPd2Al3 , 1991 .

[27]  M. Kenis,et al.  How can alien species inventories and interception data help us prevent insect invasions? , 2007, Bulletin of entomological research.

[28]  G. Ruiz,et al.  Projected effects of the Panama Canal expansion on shipping traffic and biological invasions , 2015 .

[29]  Ivan Deriu,et al.  Building the European Alien Species Information Network (EASIN): a novel approach for the exploration of distributed alien species data , 2012 .

[30]  G. Coenders,et al.  Introduction pathways and establishment rates of invasive aquatic species in Europe , 2005 .

[31]  C. Brasier,et al.  The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants , 2008 .

[32]  M. Gross Alien invaders , 2012, Current Biology.

[33]  Bernd Blasius,et al.  Indications of marine bioinvasion from network theory , 2011 .

[34]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Alien invaders and reptile traders: what drives the live animal trade in South Africa? , 2010 .

[35]  Jean-Marie Cornuet,et al.  Bridgehead Effect in the Worldwide Invasion of the Biocontrol Harlequin Ladybird , 2010, PloS one.

[36]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  Sven Bacher,et al.  Gaps in Border Controls Are Related to Quarantine Alien Insect Invasions in Europe , 2012, PloS one.

[38]  D. L. Ebbels Pest risk analysis. , 2003 .

[39]  B. Richardson,et al.  Alien forest insects in a warmer world and a globalised economy: impacts of changes in trade, tourism and climate on forest biosecurity. , 2010 .

[40]  D. Lodge,et al.  Failure of the Lacey Act to protect US ecosystems against animal invasions , 2007 .

[41]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Invasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and Health , 2010 .

[42]  P. Hulme Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization , 2009 .

[43]  H. Mooney,et al.  Vector science and integrated vector management in bioinvasion ecology: conceptual frameworks. , 2005 .

[44]  Steven C Le Comber,et al.  From Jack the Ripper to epidemiology and ecology. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  T. Blackburn,et al.  Comparing determinants of alien bird impacts across two continents: implications for risk assessment and management , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[46]  P. Hulme,et al.  Addressing the threat to biodiversity from botanic gardens. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions , 2019 .

[48]  D. Villero,et al.  Historical Ecology and Invasion Biology: Long-Term Distribution Changes of Introduced Freshwater Species , 2014 .

[49]  F. Kraus,et al.  Alien reptiles and amphibians : a scientific compendium and analysis , 2009 .

[50]  R. Keller,et al.  Vectors and Timing of Freshwater Invasions in Great Britain , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[51]  S. Katsanevakis,et al.  Invading European Seas: Assessing pathways of introduction of marine aliens , 2013 .

[52]  Long after the event, or four things we (should) know about bird invasions , 2015, Journal of Ornithology.

[53]  Daisie Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. , 2016 .

[54]  F. Kraus Alien reptiles and amphibians , 2008 .

[55]  Elizabeth Cook,et al.  Horizon scanning for invasive alien species with the potential to threaten biodiversity in Great Britain , 2014, Global change biology.

[56]  Marnie L Campbell,et al.  ‘Double trouble’: the expansion of the Suez Canal and marine bioinvasions in the Mediterranean Sea , 2015, Biological Invasions.

[57]  P. Hulme Resolving whether botanic gardens are on the road to conservation or a pathway for plant invasions , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[58]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Michael T. Gastner,et al.  The risk of marine bioinvasion caused by global shipping. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[60]  A. Roques,et al.  Taxonomic dissimilarity in patterns of interception and establishment of alien arthropods, nematodes and pathogens affecting woody plants in Europe , 2015 .

[61]  T. Blackburn,et al.  Mistakes in the analysis of exotic species establishment: source pool designation and correlates of introduction success among parrots (Aves: Psittaciformes) of the world , 2004 .

[62]  M. Lehtiniemi,et al.  Ten recommendations for advancing the assessment and management of non-indigenous species in marine ecosystems , 2014 .

[63]  Reuben P Keller,et al.  Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioeconomic benefits , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Caz M Taylor,et al.  The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence , 2004 .

[65]  Robert A. Haack,et al.  Effectiveness of the International Phytosanitary Standard ISPM No. 15 on Reducing Wood Borer Infestation Rates in Wood Packaging Material Entering the United States , 2014, PloS one.

[66]  Mark Vellend,et al.  Historical ecology: using unconventional data sources to test for effects of global environmental change. , 2013, American journal of botany.