What is the optimal number of researchers for social science research?

Many studies have found that co-authored research is more highly cited than single author research. This finding is policy relevant as it indicates that encouraging co-authored research will tend to maximise citation impact. Nevertheless, whilst the citation impact of research increase as the number of authors increases in the sciences, the extent to which this occurs in the social sciences is unknown. In response, this study investigates the average citation level of articles with one to four authors published in 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004 and 2007 in 19 social science disciplines. The results suggest that whilst having at least two authors gives a substantial citation impact advantage in all social science disciplines, additional authors are beneficial in some disciplines but not in others.

[1]  María Bordons,et al.  Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: The effects of the multidisciplinary research programme , 1999, Scientometrics.

[2]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[3]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Local, Domestic and International Scientific Collaboration in Biomedical Research , 1996, Scientometrics.

[4]  Darrell Crase,et al.  Single versus multiple authorship in professional journals. , 1992 .

[5]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[6]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Scandinavia: A Bibliometric Approach , 2000, Scientometrics.

[7]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Coauthorship Patterns and Trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A Bibliometric Study With Implications for Database Indexing and Search Strategies , 2002, Libr. Trends.

[8]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[9]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Learning and knowledge networks in interdisciplinary collaborations: Research Articles , 2006 .

[10]  J. Koricheva,et al.  Does Scientific Collaboration Increase the Impact of Ecological Articles? , 2005 .

[11]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.

[12]  Yuh-Shan Ho,et al.  Use of citation per publication as an indicator to evaluate pentachlorophenol research , 2008, Scientometrics.

[13]  O. Uthman,et al.  BMC Infectious Diseases BioMed Central Correspondence HIV/AIDS in Nigeria: a bibliometric analysis , 2007 .

[14]  Necmi Kemal Avkiran,et al.  Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research , 2006, Scientometrics.

[15]  André Luiz Fischer,et al.  Driving Factors of High Performance in Brazilian Management Sciences for the 1981–1995 Period , 2000, Scientometrics.

[16]  Ali Gazni,et al.  Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications , 2011, Scientometrics.

[17]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics , 2010, Scientometrics.

[18]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  E. E. Vogel,et al.  Impact factor and international collaboration in Chilean physics: 1987–1994 , 1997, Scientometrics.

[20]  Lars Frode Frederiksen,et al.  Disciplinary determinants of bibliometric impact in Danish industrial research: Collaboration and visibility , 2004, Scientometrics.

[21]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Tony Dale,et al.  Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and 'Periphery Effects' in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[23]  Bárbara S. Lancho-Barrantes,et al.  Citation increments between collaborating countries , 2012, Scientometrics.

[24]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[25]  Jacqueline Leta,et al.  Recognition and international collaboration: the Brazilian case , 2002, Scientometrics.

[26]  Diana Hicks,et al.  How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model , 1997, Scientometrics.

[27]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[28]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies , 2004, Scientometrics.

[29]  H. Herbertz,et al.  Does it pay to cooperate? A bibliometric case study in molecular biology , 1995, Scientometrics.

[30]  Richard L. Hart,et al.  Collaboration and Article Quality in the Literature of Academic Librarianship , 2007 .

[31]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators , 1999, Scientometrics.

[32]  J. Brownstein,et al.  Does Collocation Inform the Impact of Collaboration? , 2010, PloS one.

[33]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[34]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results , 1998, Scientometrics.

[35]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  New methods for an old debate: Utilizing reader response to investigate the relationship between collaboration and quality in academic journal articles , 2012 .

[36]  Michael Weale.  Scientific community: Tapping into success and collaboration. , 2013, Nature.

[37]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Learning and knowledge networks in interdisciplinary collaborations , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  Nan Ma,et al.  An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in Molecular Biology , 2005, Scientometrics.

[39]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[40]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Intra-European cooperation compared to international collaboration , 2014 .

[41]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry , 2004, Scientometrics.