Neural network-based fuel consumption estimation for container ships in Korea

ABSTRACT Due to the outstanding strength of advanced machine-learning techniques, they have become increasingly common in predictive studies in recent years, particularly in predicting ship energy performance. In constructing predictive models, prior studies have mostly employed vessels’ technical parameters to establish machine-learning algorithms. To bridge this research gap and enable wider applications, this paper presents the design of a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP ANN) as a machine-learning technique to estimate ship fuel consumption. We utilized the real operational data from 100–143 container ships to estimate fuel consumption for five different container ships grouped by size. We compared the performance of two ANN models and two multiple-regression models. Four input parameters (sailing time, speed, cargo weight, and capacity) were included in the first ANN and the first regression model, while the other two models only consider two inputs from physical function. The mean absolute percentage error of the ANN models with four inputs was the smallest and less than those in extended statistical models, demonstrating the MLP’s superiority over the statistical model. The MLP ANN model can thus be applied to confirm the effectiveness of the slow-steaming method for achieving energy efficiency.

[1]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Outliers detection and treatment: a review , 2010 .

[2]  J V Tu,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  C. Dere,et al.  Load optimization of central cooling system pumps of a container ship for the slow steaming conditions to enhance the energy efficiency , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[4]  Adam Sobey,et al.  Physics-based shaft power prediction for large merchant ships using neural networks , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[5]  Yiik Diew Wong,et al.  ANFIS model for assessing near-miss risk during tanker shipping voyages , 2019, Maritime Policy & Management.

[6]  Mehdi Khashei,et al.  An artificial neural network (p, d, q) model for timeseries forecasting , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Chuanlei Yang,et al.  Investigation of ANN and SVM based on limited samples for performance and emissions prediction of a CRDI-assisted marine diesel engine , 2017 .

[8]  Cheng-Lung Huang,et al.  A distributed PSO-SVM hybrid system with feature selection and parameter optimization , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  Maja Škurić,et al.  Ship emissions and their externalities in cruise ports , 2015, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[10]  A. Maragkogianni,et al.  Evaluating the social cost of cruise ships air emissions in major ports of Greece , 2015 .

[11]  Mingyang Zhang,et al.  Data-driven ship energy efficiency analysis and optimization model for route planning in ice-covered Arctic waters , 2019, Ocean Engineering.

[12]  Ole Winther,et al.  Statistical modelling for ship propulsion efficiency , 2012 .

[13]  Young-Tae Chang,et al.  Have Emission Control Areas (ECAs) harmed port efficiency in Europe , 2018 .

[14]  Ji-Hyun Kim,et al.  Estimating classification error rate: Repeated cross-validation, repeated hold-out and bootstrap , 2009, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[15]  Kai Wang,et al.  Modelling Seasonal Brucellosis Epidemics in Bayingolin Mongol Autonomous Prefecture of Xinjiang, China, 2010–2014 , 2016, BioMed research international.

[16]  Young-Tae Chang,et al.  Assessing noxious gases of vessel operations in a potential Emission Control Area , 2014 .

[17]  Qingji Zhou,et al.  Addressing the epistemic uncertainty in maritime accidents modelling using Bayesian network with interval probabilities , 2018 .

[18]  Xinping Yan,et al.  Real-time optimization of ship energy efficiency based on the prediction technology of working condition , 2016 .

[19]  G. Nagarajan,et al.  Artificial neural network approach to predict the engine performance of fish oil biodiesel with diethyl ether using back propagation algorithm , 2016 .

[20]  R. Velo,et al.  Wind speed estimation using multilayer perceptron , 2014 .

[21]  Michael R. Lyu,et al.  A hybrid particle swarm optimization-back-propagation algorithm for feedforward neural network training , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..

[22]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Outliers in Statistical Data , 1979 .

[23]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz Watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms , 2013, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[24]  Gunwoo Lee,et al.  Voyage-based statistical fuel consumption models of ocean-going container ships in Korea , 2020, Maritime Policy & Management.

[25]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  Speed Optimization vs Speed Reduction: the Choice between Speed Limits and a Bunker Levy , 2019, Sustainability.

[26]  J. Kersten,et al.  Impedance cardiography (electrical velocimetry) and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in pediatric intensive care patients: a prospective single-center observational study , 2014, Critical Care.

[27]  Ole Winther,et al.  A Machine-Learning Approach to Predict Main Energy Consumption under Realistic Operational Conditions , 2012 .

[28]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[29]  Yongtu Liang,et al.  A voyage with minimal fuel consumption for cruise ships , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[30]  Shan Sung Liew,et al.  Bounded activation functions for enhanced training stability of deep neural networks on visual pattern recognition problems , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[31]  Yiik Diew Wong,et al.  A fuzzy and Bayesian network CREAM model for human reliability analysis – The case of tanker shipping , 2018 .

[32]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC , 2015, Statistics and Computing.

[33]  Ali Najah Ahmed,et al.  Comparative study of artificial neural network and mathematical model on marine diesel engine performance prediction , 2018 .

[34]  Sohrab Zendehboudi,et al.  Prediction of Condensate-to-Gas Ratio for Retrograde Gas Condensate Reservoirs Using Artificial Neural Network with Particle Swarm Optimization , 2012 .

[35]  James J. Corbett,et al.  The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping , 2009 .

[36]  Hong Xu,et al.  An enhanced CREAM with stakeholder-graded protocols for tanker shipping safety application , 2017 .

[37]  Ülkü Alver Şahin,et al.  Estimating of shipping emissions in the Samsun Port from 2010 to 2015 , 2018, Atmospheric Pollution Research.

[38]  Iraklis Lazakis,et al.  Application of NARX neural network for predicting marine engine performance parameters , 2020, Ships and Offshore Structures.

[39]  Osman Turan,et al.  An artificial neural network based decision support system for energy efficient ship operations , 2016, Comput. Oper. Res..

[40]  Liang Zhao,et al.  Global solar radiation estimation with sunshine duration in Tibet, China , 2011 .

[41]  Indira Karakoti,et al.  Evaluation of different diffuse radiation models for Indian stations and predicting the best fit model , 2011 .

[42]  Ljubomir J. Buturovic,et al.  Cross-validation pitfalls when selecting and assessing regression and classification models , 2014, Journal of Cheminformatics.