Efficient optimization framework for integrated placement of horizontal wells and hydraulic fracture stages in unconventional gas reservoirs

Abstract Rapid advances in horizontal well drilling and hydraulic fracturing have made these technologies standard development strategies in unconventional gas reservoirs. Further improvements in these practices by means of numerical optimization of wellbore locations and hydraulic fracture (HF) stages spacing can enhance shale gas reserves and increase revenue from the unconventional projects. In order to solve these two challenges simultaneously as an integrated optimization problem, an automated framework for placement of horizontal wellbores and HF stages is developed and tested in this paper. Coupled with expert knowledge and engineering judgment, this workflow allows to produce unconventional assets economically. This paper presents specifics of our novel optimization framework that improves the design and placement of HF stages in shale gas reservoirs and increases production and the net present value (NPV) of the projects by judicious application of numerical optimization algorithms. In particular, we test several gradient-based and gradient-free methods, namely, simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES). Application of these optimization strategies to a suite of test cases illustrates that it is not necessary to assume even spacing between HF stages because the algorithms have a capability to optimize HF stages spacing in homogeneous and heterogeneous geologic systems.

[1]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Optimal well placement using an adjoint gradient , 2010 .

[2]  C. Boyer,et al.  Coalbed- and Shale-Gas Reservoirs , 2008 .

[3]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  On optimization algorithms for the reservoir oil well placement problem , 2006 .

[4]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2018, Fundamental Statistical Inference.

[5]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Comparing Review , 2006, Towards a New Evolutionary Computation.

[6]  Waleed Fazelipour Innovative Simulation Techniques to History Match Horizontal Wells in Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2010 .

[7]  Robert A. Wattenbarger,et al.  Triple-porosity Models: One Further Step Towards Capturing Fractured Reservoirs Heterogeneity , 2011 .

[8]  Robert A. Wattenbarger,et al.  Accounting For Adsorbed Gas in Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2011 .

[9]  Ross Schweitzer,et al.  The Role of Economics on Well and Fracture Design Completions of Marcellus Shale Wells , 2009 .

[10]  S. Holt Numerical Optimization of Hydraulic Fracture Stage Placement in a Gas Shale Reservoir , 2011 .

[11]  K. Pruess,et al.  TOUGH2 User's Guide Version 2 , 1999 .

[12]  J. Spall Multivariate stochastic approximation using a simultaneous perturbation gradient approximation , 1992 .

[13]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  Optimization of Multiple Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Wells in Unconventional Gas Reservoirs , 2013 .

[14]  Craig L. Cipolla,et al.  Modeling Production and Evaluating Fracture Performance in Unconventional Gas Reservoirs , 2009 .

[15]  Ning Liu,et al.  Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching , 2008 .

[16]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[17]  J. Curtis Fractured shale-gas systems , 2002 .

[18]  Stephen A. Holditch,et al.  Hydraulic fracturing: Overview, trends, issues , 2007 .