Technological distance measures: new perspectives on nearby and far away
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Knut Blind,et al. Technological convergence and the absorptive capacity of standardisation , 2015 .
[2] A. P. Man,et al. Transitory Alliances: An Instrument for Surviving Turbulent Industries? , 2003 .
[3] Glenn Hoetker,et al. TECHNOLOGICAL OVERLAP, TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES, AND RESOURCE RECOMBINATION IN TECHNOLOGICAL ACQUISITIONS , 2014 .
[4] Adam B. Jaffe,et al. Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers☆ , 1989 .
[5] Dar-Zen Chen,et al. The bibliographic coupling approach to filter the cited and uncited patent citations: a case of electric vehicle technology , 2012, Scientometrics.
[6] Ismael Rafols,et al. Interactive overlay maps for US patent (USPTO) data based on International Patent Classification (IPC) , 2012, Scientometrics.
[7] P. Peretto,et al. Technological Distance, Growth and Scale Effects , 2002 .
[8] Frank T. Rothaermel,et al. Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009, Organ. Sci..
[9] M. Fung. Technological proximity and co-movements of stock returns , 2003 .
[10] Sebastian Heil,et al. Preparing for distant collaboration: Antecedents to potential absorptive capacity in cross-industry innovation , 2014 .
[11] Z. Griliches. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .
[12] J. Leker,et al. Anticipating converging industries using publicly available data , 2010 .
[13] O. Gassmann,et al. Crossing the Industry-Line: Breakthrough Innovation through Cross-Industry Alliances with ‘Non-Suppliers’ , 2010 .
[14] Mark Jansen,et al. When is a network a nexus for innovation? A study of public nanotechnology R&D projects in the Netherlands , 2012 .
[15] Chao-Chan Wu,et al. Using patent analyses to monitor the technological trends in an emerging field of technology: a case of carbon nanotube field emission display , 2009, Scientometrics.
[16] Bokyoung Kang,et al. Novelty-focused patent mapping for technology opportunity analysis , 2015 .
[17] C. Autant‐Bernard,et al. Social distance versus spatial distance in R & D cooperation: Empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies , 2007 .
[18] Nathalie Sick,et al. Identifying trends in battery technologies with regard to electric mobility: evidence from patenting activities along and across the battery value chain , 2015 .
[19] J. Leker,et al. Market convergence in the field of stationary energy storage systems , 2015, 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET).
[20] J. Hagedoorn,et al. Mergers and acquisitions : their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries , 2006 .
[21] J. Sylvan Katz,et al. Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration , 1994, Scientometrics.
[22] M. Beller,et al. New synthetic protocols for the preparation of unsymmetrical bisindoles. , 2006, Organic letters.
[23] Jens Leker,et al. How to measure technological distance in collaborations? The case of electric mobility , 2013, 2013 Proceedings of PICMET '13: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (PICMET).
[24] Toby E. Stuart. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .
[25] Xianwen Wang,et al. Divergence and convergence: technology-relatedness evolution in solar energy industry , 2013, Scientometrics.
[26] R. Katila,et al. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .
[27] Aija Leiponen,et al. A measure of technological distance , 2012 .
[28] Bart Nooteboom,et al. Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity , 2005 .
[29] B. Wernerfelt,et al. A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .
[30] Ulrich Kaiser. Measuring knowledge spillovers in manufacturing and services: an empirical assessment of alternative approaches , 2002 .
[31] Shann-Bin Chang,et al. Using patent analysis to establish technological position: Two different strategic approaches , 2012 .
[32] G. Duysters,et al. The Role of Alliance Network Redundancy in the Creation of Core and Non-Core Technologies , 2009 .
[33] Cécile Ayerbe,et al. A method using two dimensions of the patent classification for measuring the technological proximity: an application in identifying a potential R&D partner in biotechnology , 2014 .
[34] Christian Sternitzke,et al. Similarity measures for document mapping: A comparative study on the level of an individual scientist , 2007, Scientometrics.
[35] Timothy R. Anderson,et al. Innovation in technology management : the key to global leadership , 1997 .
[36] A. Jaffe. Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .
[37] Joachim Schummer,et al. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2004, Scientometrics.
[38] Devi R. Gnyawali,et al. Behavioral implications of absorptive capacity: The role of technological effort and technological capability in leveraging alliance network technological resources , 2015 .
[39] Alan L. Porter,et al. Technology life cycle analysis method based on patent documents , 2013 .
[40] Alan L. Porter,et al. Innovation forecasting , 1997, Innovation in Technology Management. The Key to Global Leadership. PICMET '97.
[41] Bart Nooteboom,et al. Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density , 2006 .
[42] George W. Furnas,et al. Pictures of relevance: A geometric analysis of similarity measures , 1987, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[43] M. Meyer,et al. Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application , 1998, Scientometrics.
[44] Holger Ernst,et al. Patent information for strategic technology management , 2003 .
[45] Yeonbae Kim,et al. Measuring relatedness between technological fields , 2010, Scientometrics.
[46] Liwen Vaughan,et al. Comparing business competition positions based on Web co-link data: The global market vs. the Chinese market , 2006, Scientometrics.
[47] M. Kotabe,et al. The role of strategic alliances in high‐technology new product development , 1995 .
[48] 魏屹东,et al. Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.
[49] Robert C. McNamee. Can’t see the forest for the leaves: Similarity and distance measures for hierarchical taxonomies with a patent classification example , 2013 .
[50] Daniel A. Levinthal,et al. ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .
[51] Devendra Sahal,et al. The generalized distance measures of technology , 1976 .
[52] Joel Waldfogel,et al. Close to You? Bias and Precision in Patent-Based Measures of Technological Proximity , 2007 .
[53] Wolfgang Becker,et al. R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry , 2004 .
[54] Chih-Hung Hsieh,et al. Measuring the value of patents with fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: insight into the practices of the Industrial Technology Research Institute , 2015 .