What is a Good Decision? Criteria for Environmental Decision Making

What constitutes a good decision about the environment? Some research traditions offer concepts, theories and methods intended to improve both individual and collective decision making about actions that will effect the environment. But there is relatively little explicit discussion of what would be appropriate criteria for calling an environmental decision a good choice. Six criteria for evaluating environmental decisions are suggested: human and environmental well-being, competence about facts and values, fairness in process and outcome, a reliance on human strengths rather than weaknesses, the opportunity to learn and efficiency. It is hoped that an explicit discussion of the appropriate criteria for environmental decisions will lead to better conceptualizations, better tools and ultimately better decisions.

[1]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information and Voluntary Measures , 2003 .

[2]  Thomas Dietz Theory and Method in Social Impact Assessment , 1987 .

[3]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts: Concepts and Cases , 2003 .

[4]  P. Stern,et al.  Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .

[5]  L. Lave Risk Assessment and Management , 2013, Advances in Risk Analysis.

[6]  D. Campbell Reforms as experiments , 1969 .

[7]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse , 1995 .

[8]  T. Burns,et al.  Human Agency and the Evolutionary Dynamics of Culture , 1992 .

[9]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Energy impacts of a municipal conservation policy , 1982 .

[10]  E. Rosa Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk , 1998 .

[11]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics , 1993 .

[12]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Evaluation of a community-Based electricity load management program , 1983 .

[13]  A. Boardman,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice , 1996 .

[14]  Thomas Webler,et al.  “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick , 1995 .

[15]  Policy Division Our Common Journey:: A Transition Toward Sustainability , 1999 .

[16]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Evaluating Social Science Research , 1979 .

[17]  J. Habermas Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[18]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .

[19]  Robert J. Brulle Agency, Democracy, and Nature: The U.S. Environmental Movement from a Critical Theory Perspective , 2000 .

[20]  Julia M. Wondolleck,et al.  Environmental Disputes: Community Involvement In Conflict Resolution , 1990 .

[21]  R Flanigan,et al.  What should we do? , 1999, Bioethics forum.

[22]  J. Habermas Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action , 1990 .

[23]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[24]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Public and its Problems , 1927 .

[25]  E. Vine,et al.  Energy efficiency and the environment: Forging the link , 1991 .

[26]  What works: documenting energy conservation in buildings , 1984 .

[27]  D. Meadows,et al.  The Limits to Growth , 2018, Green Planet Blues.

[28]  A. Sen,et al.  Commodities and Capabilities , 1987 .

[29]  A. Sen,et al.  Rationality and Freedom , 2002 .

[30]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[31]  Michael A. Toman,et al.  The Economics of Sustainability: A Review of Journal Articles , 2002 .

[32]  W. W. Bartley,et al.  Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge , 1987 .

[33]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .