Cerebrovascular systems with concomitant pathologies:A computational hemodynamics study

Although unusual, cerebral aneurysms may coexist with a proximal artery stenosis. In that small percent of patients, such coexistence poses a challenge for interventional neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons to make the best treatment decision. According to previous studies, the incidence of cerebral aneurysms in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis is not greater than 5%, where the aneurysm is usually incidentally detected, being 2% for aneurysms and stenoses in the same cerebral circulation. Those cases pose a difficult management decision for the physician. Case reports showed patients who died due to aneurysm rupture months after endarterectomy but before aneurysm clipping, while others did not show any change in the aneurysm after plaque removal, having optimum outcome after aneurysm coiling. The aim of this study is to investigate the intraaneurysmal hemodynamic changes before and after treatment of stenotic plaque. Idealized models were constructed with different stenotic grade, distance and relative position to the aneurysm. Digital removal of the stenotic plaque was performed in the reconstructed model of a patient with both pathologies. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were performed using a finite element method approach. Blood velocity field and hemodynamic forces were recorded and analyzed. Changes in the flow patterns and wall shear stress values and distributions were observed in both ideal and image-based models. Detailed investigation of wall shear stress distributions in patients with both pathologies is required to make the best management decision.

[1]  C M Putman,et al.  Hemodynamic Patterns of Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms: A Possible Association with Rupture , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[2]  Rakesh Shrivastava,et al.  Concomitant Intracranial Aneurysm and Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Therapeutic Dilemma , 2006, Southern medical journal.

[3]  C. Putman,et al.  Flow–area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[4]  R. Löhner Regridding Surface Triangulations , 1996 .

[5]  H. Adams,et al.  Carotid stenosis and coexisting ipsilateral intracranial aneurysm. A problem in management. , 1977, Archives of neurology.

[6]  T F Sherman,et al.  On connecting large vessels to small. The meaning of Murray's law , 1981, The Journal of general physiology.

[7]  V. C. Patel,et al.  Turbulence models for near-wall and low Reynolds number flows - A review , 1985 .

[8]  G. Espinosa,et al.  Endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis associated with incidental intracranial aneurysm. , 2009, Annals of vascular surgery.

[9]  Juan R Cebral,et al.  Patient-specific computational modeling of cerebral aneurysms with multiple avenues of flow from 3D rotational angiography images. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[10]  D. Saloner,et al.  Numerical analysis of flow through a severely stenotic carotid artery bifurcation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  Extensions and improvements of the advancing front grid generation technique , 1996 .

[12]  P. Fischer,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of stenotic flows. Part 1. Steady flow , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  A. Fox,et al.  Small, unruptured intracranial aneurysms and management of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis , 2000, Neurology.

[14]  G Pappadà,et al.  Incidence of asymptomatic berry aneurysms among patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgical sciences.

[15]  J Huston,et al.  Carotid artery tandem lesions: frequency of angiographic detection and consequences for endarterectomy. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  Steven H Frankel,et al.  Numerical modeling of pulsatile turbulent flow in stenotic vessels. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  Juan R Cebral,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: qualitative comparison with cerebral angiography. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[18]  J. Womersley Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  R Löhner,et al.  Merging of intersecting triangulations for finite element modeling. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Finite element modeling of blood flow in arteries , 1998 .

[21]  Peter L. Choyke,et al.  Deformable isosurface and vascular applications , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  Automatic unstructured grid generators , 1997 .