When Can an Employee Refuse Unsafe Work and Expect to Be Protected from Discipline? Evidence from Canada

This paper examines 272 Canadian arbitration and labor relations board decisions involving employees who, when they refused work on the grounds that the work was unsafe, were disciplined by their employers. The authors' hypothesis is that boards treat the right to refuse unsafe work as secondary to management's right to manage. The results of the study confirm that the right to refuse was very restricted. Employees had to satisfy many rigid conditions to qualify for protection from discipline. These conditions appear to have been based on the notions that health and safety are properly management's prerogative and that obedience to management authority is essential to efficient production.

[1]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Applied Multivariate Data Analysis , 2002, Technometrics.

[2]  Mark Harcourt,et al.  Health and Safety Reform: A Review of Four Different Approaches , 1996 .

[3]  S. Caudill,et al.  A sequential selectivity model of the decisions of arbitrators , 1993 .

[4]  I. Christie,et al.  Employment Law in Canada , 1993 .

[5]  S. Caudill,et al.  An Alternative to Bemmels's Method of Investigating Biases in Arbitration , 1992 .

[6]  V. Walters.  State Mediation of Conflicts over Work Refusals: The Role of the Ontario Labour Relations Board , 1991, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[7]  Brian Bemmels,et al.  Attribution Theory and Discipline Arbitration , 1991 .

[8]  E. Palmer,et al.  Collective Agreement Arbitration in Canada , 1991 .

[9]  Brian Bemmels.  Gender Effects in Grievance Arbitration , 1990 .

[10]  R. A. Holmes,et al.  A Multivariate Logit Analysis of the Outcomes of Arbitration Decisions in British Columbia , 1990 .

[11]  Brian Bemmels,et al.  Arbitrator characteristics and arbitrator decisions , 1990 .

[12]  Brian Bemmels.  Gender Effects in Discharge Arbitration , 1988 .

[13]  Brian Bemmels.  Gender Effects in Discipline Arbitration: Evidence from British Columbia , 1988 .

[14]  Brian Bemmels.  The Effect of Grievants' Gender on Arbitrators' Decisions , 1988 .

[15]  R. Block,et al.  The Impact of Attorneys and Arbitrators on Arbitration Awards , 1987 .

[16]  James A. Gross.  Value Judgments in the Decisions of Labor Arbitrators , 1967 .

[17]  P. Greenfield,et al.  How Arbitration Works. , 1953 .

[18]  K. Thornicroft.  Do Lawyers Affect Grievance Arbitration Outcomes? The Newfoundland Experience , 1994 .

[19]  G. Eden.  Industrial Discipline in the Canadian Federal Jurisdiction , 1993 .

[20]  Donald J. Brown,et al.  Canadian labour arbitration , 1984 .

[21]  E. Tucker,et al.  Assault on the worker: Occupational health and safety in Canada , 1981 .

[22]  Larry Drapkin.  The Right to Refuse Hazardous Work after Whirlpool , 1980 .