Laws on Robots, Laws by Robots, Laws in Robots: Regulating Robot Behaviour by Design

Speculation about robot morality is almost as old as the concept of a robot itself. Asimov’s three laws of robotics provide an early and well-discussed example of moral rules robots should observe. Despite the widespread influence of the three laws of robotics and their role in shaping visions of future robo-dense worlds, these laws have been neglected as futuristic by hands-on roboticists who have been busy with addressing less abstract questions about robots’ behaviour concerning space locomotion, obstacles avoidance, automatic learning, among others. Between morality and function lies a vast gap. When robots enter our everyday lives they will have to observe social and legal norms. For example, social robots in the hospitals are expected to observe social rules (they should not interrupt a mourning family) and robotic dust cleaners scouring the streets for waste as well as automated cars will have to observe traffic regulation. In this article we elaborate on the various ways in which robotic behaviour is regulated. We distinguish between imposing regulations on robots, imposing regulation by robots, and imposing regulation in robots. In doing this, we distinguish regulation that aims at influencing human behaviour and regulation whose scope is robots’ behaviour. We claim that the artificial agency of robots requires designers and regulators to look at the question of how to regulate robots’ behaviour in a way that renders it compliant with legal norms. Regulation by design offers a means for this. We further explore this idea through the example of automated cars.

[1]  B. van den Berg.  Robots as Tools for Techno-Regulation , 2011 .

[2]  Mireille Hildebrandt,et al.  Law at a Crossroads: Losing the Thread or Regaining Control? The Collapse of Distance in Real Time Computing , 2009 .

[3]  B. Fogg.  The ethics of persuasive technology , 2003 .

[4]  A. van Wynsberghe.  Designing robots with care: creating an ethical framework for the future design and implementation of care robots , 2012 .

[5]  Samir Chopra,et al.  A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents , 2011 .

[6]  Daniel Gross,et al.  From Non-Functional Requirements to Design through Patterns , 2001, Requirements Engineering.

[7]  Mark Cenite.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 2000 .

[8]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  On the Morality of Artificial Agents , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[9]  Martin Glinz,et al.  On Non-Functional Requirements , 2007, 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007).

[10]  Ugo Pagallo,et al.  The Laws of Robots - Crimes, Contracts, and Torts , 2013, Law, Governance and Technology Series.

[11]  Raymond Hoogendoorn,et al.  Automated Driving, Traffic Flow Efficiency, and Human Factors , 2014 .

[12]  Luciano Floridi.  Artificial Companions and their Philosophical Challenges , 2007 .

[13]  Magali Seguran,et al.  Requirements engineering within a large-scale security-oriented research project: lessons learned , 2011, Requirements Engineering.

[14]  David J. Smith,et al.  Changing Situations and Changing People , 2000 .

[15]  Roger Brownsword,et al.  What the World Needs Now: Techno-Regulation, Human Rights and Human Dignity , 2004 .

[16]  Ronald Leenes,et al.  Framing Techno-Regulation: An Exploration of State and Non-State Regulation by Technology , 2011 .

[17]  Francesco Borrelli,et al.  Predictive Active Steering Control for Autonomous Vehicle Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[18]  Robert Sugden,et al.  On Nudging: A Review of Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein , 2009 .

[19]  David J. Calverley,et al.  Imagining a non-biological machine as a legal person , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[21]  Lawrence B. Solum.  Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences , 2008, Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics.

[22]  Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al.  Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[23]  Bert-Jaap Koops,et al.  Criteria for Normative Technology: An Essay on the Acceptability of 'Code as Law' in Light of Democratic and Constitutional Values , 2007 .